Yue Zhao; Baili Chen; Yao He; Shenghong Zhang; Yun Qiu; Rui Feng; Hongsheng Yang; Zhirong Zeng; Shomron Ben-Horin; Minhu Chen; Ren Mao

doi:10.5217/ir.2019.00103

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Intest Res > Volume 18(2); 2020 > Article

Original Article Inflammatory bowel diseases Risk Factors Associated with Impaired Ovarian Reserve in Young Women of Reproductive Age with Crohn’s Disease: Yue Zhao^1,*, Baili Chen^1,*, Yao He¹, Shenghong Zhang¹, Yun Qiu¹, Rui Feng¹, Hongsheng Yang¹, Zhirong Zeng¹, Shomron Ben-Horin^1,2, Minhu Chen¹, Ren Mao¹; Intestinal Research 2020;18(2):200-209.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.00103
Published online: March 31, 2020

¹Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

²Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Correspondence to Ren Mao, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, NO. 58 Zhongshan II Road, Guangzhou 510080, China. Tel: +86-87755766, Fax: +86-20-87332916, E-mail: maoren2023@gmail.com

*These authors contributed equally to this study.

• Received: September 8, 2019 • Revised: February 4, 2020 • Accepted: February 5, 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

9,786 Views
137 Download
27 Web of Science
31 Crossref
30 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Background/Aims
Crohn’s disease (CD) primarily affects young female adults of reproductive age. Few studies have been conducted on this population’s ovarian reserve status. The aim of study was to investigate potential risk factors associated with low ovarian reserve, as reflected by serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in women of reproductive age with CD.
Methods
This was a case-control study. Cases included 87 patients with established CD, and healthy controls were matched by age, height and weight in a 1:1 ratio. Serum AMH levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results
The average serum AMH level was significantly lower in CD patients than in control group (2.47±2.08 ng/mL vs. 3.87±1.96 ng/mL, respectively, P<0.001). Serum AMH levels were comparable between CD patients and control group under 25 years of age (4.41±1.52 ng/mL vs. 3.49±2.10 ng/mL, P=0.06), however, serum AMH levels were significantly lower in CD patients over 25 years of age compared to control group (P<0.05). Multivariable analysis showed that an age greater than 25 (odds ratio [OR], 10.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90–52.93, P=0.007), active disease state (OR, 27.99; 95% CI, 6.13–127.95, P<0.001) and thalidomide use (OR, 15.66; 95% CI, 2.22–110.65, P=0.006) were independent risk factors associated with low ovarian reserve (serum AMH levels <2 ng/mL) in CD patients.
Conclusions
Ovarian reserve is impaired in young women of reproductive age with CD. Age over 25 and an active disease state were both independently associated with low ovarian reserve. Thalidomide use could result in impaired ovarian reserve.
Keywords: Crohn disease; Ovarian reserve; Anti-Mullerian hormone

INTRODUCTION

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic and recurrent intestinal inflammatory disorder that typically affects young females of reproductive age [1-7]. Previous retrospective studies suggest that CD is associated with decreased fertility rate [8-14]. CD-associated inflammation in the pelvis, including the fallopian tubes and ovaries, as well as surgery-related chronic tubal adhesions, 1could potentially affect fertility of female CD patients [15-19]. In addition, voluntary childlessness due to excessive anxiety and lack of disease knowledge could also lead to a decreased fertility rate [20].

Ovarian reserve, which reflects the quantity and quality of oocytes in the ovary, is an indicator of fertility in females of reproductive age [21,22]. Conventional hormonal tests, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone and estrogen, have been utilized to evaluate ovarian reserve. However, these methods are limited, as sample collection is required on a specific day of the menstrual cycle [23]. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a new hormone marker of ovarian reserve, can be measured on any day of the menstrual cycle, as it remains stable throughout the cycle [24,25]. As an early, reliable and quantitative indicator, AMH is considered the most accurate hormonal marker of ovarian reserve [26].

To date, only limited data regarding serum AMH levels in female CD patients is available with inconsistent findings [27-29]. In the study reported by Şenateş et al. [28], AMH was measured in a relatively small sample of 35 CD patients, and AMH levels in CD patients were significantly lower compared to the controls. However, in another study including 50 patients with CD [27], no statistical difference was found between mean serum AMH levels in CD and control women. Moreover, risk factors associated with decreased ovarian reserve remain unclarified [27,29]. This is an important knowledge gap that identifying risk factors associated with decreased ovarian reserve could help to prevent impairment of ovarian reserve. The aim of the current study was to both investigate AMH level alteration in female CD patients and identify independent risk factors affecting decreased AMH levels in a case-control study based on sample size calculation.

METHODS

1. Study Design and Population

We performed an individually matched, case-control cross-sectional study at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, a tertiary IBD referral center, from January 2013 to March 2018. Reproductive age was defined as 18 to 45 years old [20]. CD diagnosis was defined through clinical manifestations and endoscopic, radiologic, and histopathological findings [3]. Exclusive criteria were: age less than 18 years old or more than 45 years old, oral contraceptive taking history, a gynecological and endocrine relevant surgical history, cytotoxic drugs history, pelvic radiotherapy history, diagnosed or potential polycystic ovary syndrome, thyroid disease, hyperprolactinemia or other relevant diseases, diagnosed or potential malignancies or other gynecological organic diseases [27,28]. Healthy controls were recruited from local communities. Controls were matched with CD patients for age, height and weight in a 1:1 ratio, non-pregnancy and not taking oral contraceptive. We obtained informed consent from all cases and controls. The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (IRB No. 2015-47).

2. AMH Measurement

Ovarian reserve was determined by serum AMH levels measured by ELISA (AMH Gen II ELISA, Kangrun Biotech Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) in duplicate samples for the cases and controls as previously reported [24]. Briefly, blood samples were collected from the cubital vein of all included subjects after a 12-hour fast. Blood samples were centrifuged at 2,000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C within 2 hours of venipuncture. All serum samples were immediately stored in polypropylene tubes at –80°C until further analysis. The range of detection was 0.05 to 15.93 ng/mL with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation below or equal to 4.71% and 5.87%. To minimize the chance of bias in the assay, all sera were processed on the same day, using the same measurement kits, and by the same operator.

3. Definitions

Low ovarian reserve was defined as serum AMH levels below 2 ng/mL [27,30]. In an additional analysis, diminished ovarian reserve was also pragmatically defined as serum AMH levels below 1.1 ng/mL [31]. CD activity was evaluated by the CDAI. Patients with a CDAI score less than 150 were considered to be in remission, and a CDAI score over 150 was considered active. The chronic diarrhea was defined as loose or watery stools >25% of the time without predominant abdominal pain or bloating (criterion fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months before diagnosis and patients meeting criteria for diarrhea-predominant IBS should be excluded) [32].

4. Sample Size Calculation

The sample size was determined based on a level of significance, two-sided test at α=0.05 and power (1-β) of 0.8 with sampling ratio of 1:1 [33]. This calculation was based on an estimated number of possible cases with low AMH levels in the CD and control groups [27]. These data were combined with several assumptions to determine that a sample size of 60 subjects in each group would have an 80% power to detect a difference in low AMH level events.

5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical data were analyzed with SPSS version 12.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). An unpaired t-test and paired t-test were used for normally distributed data, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for non-normally distributed data. Dichotomized variables were compared using a chi-square test or Fisher two-tailed test. A logistic regression was constructed with the most informative variables. Only variables with P<0.10 were retained in the final model using a forward stepwise approach. Adjusted OR and 95% CI were derived from the estimated regression coefficients. A two-tailed P-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

1. Patient Demographic Characteristics

A total of 87 female CD patients and 87 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. The demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. The median CD duration was 6.1 years (range, 0.3–15.6 years). Forty-three CD patients were in an active disease state and 44 were in remission. Seven CD patients had not used any medical treatment. The remaining patients had received at least 1 month of medical treatment prior to blood sample collection, including 11 patients who received 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), 5 patients who received steroids, 39 patients who received azathioprine (AZA), 21 patients who received thalidomide, and 4 patients who received infliximab.

2. AMH levels in CD Patients and Healthy Controls

The comparison and distribution of serum AMH levels in CD patients and matched healthy controls are presented in Fig. 1A. The mean serum AMH level in CD patients (2.47±2.08 ng/mL) was significantly lower than that of the control group (3.87±1.96 ng/mL, P<0.001). In the paired comparison, statistical difference was also found between CD patients and matched controls (P<0.001) (Fig. 1B). When groups were divided based on age, serum AMH levels were comparable between CD patients and healthy controls for patients younger than 25 years old (4.41±1.52 ng/mL vs. 3.49±2.10 ng/mL, P=0.06), however, serum AMH levels were significantly lower in CD patients older than 25 years (P<0.05 for all comparisons) (Fig. 1C).

3. Correlation between Clinical Characteristics and AMH Levels

The mean AMH level for the 43 CD patients in an active disease state was 1.34±1.39 ng/mL, a lower value than both the 44 patients in remission (3.52±2.09 ng/mL, P<0.001) and the control group (3.87±1.96 ng/mL, P<0.001) (Fig. 2A). CD patients in a mildly active disease state showed higher serum AMH levels than patients in a moderately/severe active disease state (1.64±1.45 ng/mL vs. 0.38±0.34 ng/mL, P=0.007) (Fig. 2B).

Although the serum level of AMH was significantly lower in patients with stricturing CD (B2; 1.22±1.25 ng/mL) compared with non-stricturing/penetrating CD (B1; 2.83±2.12 ng/mL, P=0.006) (Fig. 2C), no significant difference was found between patients with non-stricturing/penetrating (B1) and penetrating CD (B3) patients (2.24±2.29 ng/mL, P=0.418). CD patients with perianal disease (1.57±1.71 ng/mL) had lower serum AMH levels than patients without perianal disease (2.80±2.12 ng/mL, P=0.015) (Fig. 2D). When assessing disease location, we found that patients with ileocolonic CD (L3) were more likely to show lower serum AMH levels (2.02±1.94 ng/mL) than patients with ileal CD (L1; 2.73±2.08 ng/mL, P=0.192) or colonic involved CD (L2; 2.97±2.23 ng/mL, P=0.081). However, none of these comparisons were statistically different (Fig. 2E).

The AMH levels of CD patients receiving thalidomide therapy (0.89±0.93 ng/mL) were significantly lower than the AMH levels of patients treated with 5-ASA or no medication (3.08±1.85 ng/mL, P<0.001), AZA (2.89±2.08 ng/mL, P<0.001) or steroid/infliximab (3.12±2.79 ng/mL, P=0.005). However, there was no significant difference in AMH levels among patients receiving 5-ASA or no medication, AZA and steroid/infliximab treatment (Fig. 2F). In addition, compared with normal control group, the AMH levels of 5-ASA/no treatment CD patient presented no statistical difference (3.08±1.85 ng/mL vs. 3.87±1.96 ng/mL, P=0.652).

4. Risk Factors Associated with Low Ovarian Reserve

When a low ovarian reserve was defined as a serum AMH level less than 2 ng/mL, univariate analyses suggested that age greater than 25 (OR, 5.12; 95% CI, 1.82–14.42; P=0.002), duration more than 6 years (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.10–6.34; P=0.029), stricturing disease (B2) (OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.15–12.09; P=0.028), perianal disease (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.23–9.07; P=0.018), active disease state (OR, 13.65; 95% CI, 4.79–38.91; P<0.001) and thalidomide use (OR, 8.50; 95% CI, 1.96–36.79; P=0.004) were associated with low ovarian reserve. Variables with P<0.10 (age greater than 25 years, duration more than 6 years, stricturing disease, perianal disease, active disease state, thalidomide use, and IBD related surgery history) were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. We found that age greater than 25 years (OR, 10.03; 95% CI, 1.90–52.93; P=0.007), active disease state (OR, 27.99; 95% CI, 6.13–127.95; P<0.001) and thalidomide use (OR, 15.66; 95% CI, 2.22–110.65; P=0.006) were independent risk factors for low ovarian reserve (Table 2). On a secondary analysis of diminished ovarian reserve defined as AMH ≤1.1 ng/mL, age greater than 25 years, active disease state and thalidomide use were still independent risk factors (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

AMH is a member of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family and is produced by the granulose cells of preantral and small antral follicles [34]. Together with antral follicle count, inhibin B and FSH concentration per cycle day, AMH levels have been used to measure ovarian reserve [25]. AMH remains stable throughout the menstrual cycle, thus has been replacing traditional FSH, luteinizing hormone, and estrogen tests of ovarian status in assisted reproductive technologies-in vitro fertilization [24] and malignancy chemotherapy [35], as well as in rheumatic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus [36] and Behçet’s disease [37]. AMH is currently considered the most accurate hormonal marker of ovarian reserve. The present study suggests that AMH levels are decreased in female CD patients over 25 years old, whereas serum AMH levels remained equivalent to controls in young women less than 25 years old. In contrast, Fréour et al. [27] reported that AMH levels remained comparable between CD and control women over 30 years old, but levels were significantly lower in CD women under 30 years old. This difference in findings may be ascribed to the fact that only young women with CD in remission were included in the Fréour et al. [27], while both active and remission patients were included in the current study.

Inflammatory burden related to CD plays an important role in fertility alterations, even without structural lesions in the gynecological system [28]. In a study with small sample size of 35 female patients, Şenateş et al. [28] reported a negative correlation between CDAI and serum AMH levels. Similarly, our study found that serum AMH levels were significantly lower in patients in an active disease state than for those in remission. Moreover, CD patients in a mildly active disease state showed higher serum AMH levels than patients in a moderately or severely active disease state. This finding may indicate that serum AMH levels are inversely correlated with the severity of CD activity.

Colonic location of CD has been reported to be independently associated with a high risk of altered ovarian reserve [27]. However, through a multivariate analysis, our data suggest that disease location is not associated with a lower ovarian reserve. Although stricturing behavior and perianal disease are risk factors associated with poor outcome of CD [38-40], neither of these factors were correlated with lower ovarian reserve in our study, a finding that is inconsistent with previous studies [27]. These data may imply that disease location and behavior may not have a direct impact on ovarian reserve, while disease activity might have direct impact on ovarian reserve.

Another novelty of the present study was a design that allowed us to investigate the potential impact of medication use on ovarian reserve. Indeed, whether medications, including steroid and immunosuppressive agents, can influence fertility outcomes is of great concern to both patients and doctors. Our results suggest that steroids, 5-ASA, thiopurines and infliximab have no significantly different effect on serum AMH levels compared with CD patients who had no medication or 5-ASA in reproductive age. However, thalidomide therapy was associated with lower ovarian reserve, which was in line with a previous study [29]. These findings imply that ovarian reserve should be monitored in female CD patients of reproductive age who are using thalidomide. Thalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug used in some patients with CD refractory to first- or second-line therapy. Previous studies report that the overall prevalence of amenorrhea was 0.02% in patients using thalidomide [41]. The immunosuppressive effects of thalidomide may also suppress functions of TGF-α, TGF-β, or interleukin-1β, which are important for the growth and development of primordium follicles and oocytes [42-45]. Nevertheless, the exact mechanism of thalidomide effects on ovarian reserve, as well as possible ovarian reserve impairment reversals, remains to be clarified in future prospective studies.

Our study has certain limitations. First, limited data are currently available on reference values of AMH. We used 2 ng/mL, the value of 25th percentile in a healthy population with regular cycling. This value has been used previously as the diagnostic standard of low ovarian reserve [27]. We also performed an additional analysis by defining diminished ovarian reserve as serum AMH levels below 1.1 ng/mL, and similar results were found. Second, the influence of AMH levels on actual fertility outcomes was not reported in this cross-sectional study. Long-term prospective studies are needed to define the relationship between AMH levels and fertility results. Moreover, the impact of medication use on AMH level was analyzed by logistic analysis, and the numbers of included patients had some differences. There were only 4 patients received infliximab treatment, while 21 patients received thalidomide treatment in our study. Future studies with more cases, especially using infliximab are needed. In addition, the proportion of patients receiving thalidomide in our study seems to be relatively high. Due to medical reimbursement policy in China, a large number of refractory CD patients who cannot afford biologics such as infliximab, and thalidomide is a good option for them in such circumstance [46-48]. More patients with different types of therapies will be included in future studies based on a great change in reimbursement policy recently, such as infliximab using, in China. Finally, a comparison of AMH levels before and after medical treatment is needed in a longitudinal study with more patients using biologics.

This study focused on the ovarian reserve and explored influencing factors of CD patients in reproductive age, which would guide patient’s fertility in further clinical practice. In addition, our study also suggested that AMH assessment could be recommended for female CD patients who had fertility needs.

In conclusion, our study suggests that ovarian reserve is impaired in female CD patients compared to healthy controls. Age over 25 years old, active disease state and thalidomide use were independently associated with low ovarian reserve.

NOTES

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant Nos. 81470821, 81270473, 81670607, and 81970483).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Chen M has received speaker fees from Janssen, Falk, Takeda, and Ipson. He Y has received speaker fees from Janssen, Falk, and Ipson. Ben-Horin S has received consultancy fees and/or research support from AbbVie, Schering-Plough, Janssen, Celltrion, and Takeda. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Chen M, Zhao Y, Chen B, He Y. Methodology: Zhao Y. Formal analysis: Zhao Y. Funding acquisition: Chen M, Zhang S, Mao R. Project administration: Qiu Y, Feng R, Yang H. Visualization: Zeng Z. Writing - original draft: Zhao Y, Mao R. Writing: Mao R, Ben-Horin S. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

Fig. 1.

The comparison of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in CD patients and healthy controls. (A) The serum AMH levels of female CD patients and healthy controls. (B) The paired comparison of serum AMH level between CD patients and matched controls. (C) The serum AMH levels of female CD patients and healthy controls of different ages. ^aP<0.05, ^bP<0.001.

Fig. 2.

The correlation between clinical characteristics and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in CD patients of reproductive age. (A) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease activity. (B) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease severity. (C) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease behavior. (D) Correlation between serum AMH levels and perianal lesions. (E) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease location. (F) Correlation between serum AMH levels and medication usage. ^aP<0.05, ^bP<0.001.

Table 1.

Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients and Healthy Controls

Characteristic	CD patient (n=87)	Control (n=87)	P-value
Age (yr)	30 (18–45)	30 (18–45)	0.933
Age distribution (yr)
18–25	31 (36)	31 (36)	1.000
26–30	20 (23)	20 (23)	1.000
31–35	16 (18)	16 (18)	1.000
36–40	10 (11)	10 (11)	1.000
41–45	10 (11)	10 (11)	1.000
Height (cm)	159.5 ± 3.5	160.7 ± 3.6	0.423
Weight (kg)	50.9 ± 6.4	54.8 ± 6.8	0.335
BMI (kg/m²)	20.4 ± 2.3	21.4 ± 2.8	0.062
Participants with children	46 (53)	56 (64)	0.915
Participants with miscarriage	5 (6)	4 (5)	0.732
Family history of GI diseases
Inflammatory disease	3 (3)	0	0.081
GI tumor	7 (8)	8 (9)	0.787
Chronic diarrhea	3 (3)	2 (2)	0.650

Values are presented as median (range), number (%), or mean±SD.

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated with Low Ovarian Reserve (AMH ≤2 ng/mL) in CD Female Patients

Characteristic	AMH		Univariable analysis		Multivariable analysis
Characteristic	≤2 ng/mL (n=38)	>2 ng/mL (n=49)	OR (95% CI)	P-value	OR (95% CI)	P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 25	6	24	Reference
> 25	32	25	5.12 (1.82–14.42)	0.002	10.03 (1.90–52.93)	0.007
Duration (yr)
≤ 6	15	26	Reference
> 6	23	23	2.64 (1.10–6.32)	0.029
IBD related surgery history^a
Yes	8	5	2.35 (0.70–7.87)	0.167
No	30	44	Reference
Disease behavior
B1	23	39	Reference
B2	11	5	3.70 (1.15–12.09)	0.028
B3	4	5	1.36 (0.33–5.57)	0.672
Perianal disease
Yes	15	8	3.34 (1.23–9.07)	0.018
No	23	41	Reference
Disease activity
In remission	7	37	Reference
Active disease	31	12	13.65 (4.79–38.91)	< 0.001	27.99 (6.13–127.95)	< 0.001
Location
L1	9	15	Reference
L2	7	16	0.73 (0.22–2.45)	0.610
L3	22	18	2.04 (0.74–5.73)	0.178
Upper GI location^b
Yes	7	4	2.54 (0.69–9.42)	0.163
No	31	45	Reference
Medication history
5-ASA/no treatment	6	12	Reference
Steroid/infliximab	3	6	1.00 (0.18–5.46)	0.999
AZA	12	27	0.89 (0.27–2.93)	0.847
Thalidomide	17	4	8.50 (1.96–36.79)	0.004	15.66 (2.22–110.65)	0.006

^a Defined as any surgery that comprised of a diversion, stricturoplasty, and luminal resection, anytime during the follow-up period. Perianal abscess drainage or seton placement were not included.

^b Includes all patients with upper GI tract disease associated with intestinal disease, instead of isolated upper GI disease.

AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; B, behavior; L, location; 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; AZA, azathioprine.

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated with Low Ovarian Reserve (AMH≤1.1 ng/mL) in CD Female Patients

Characteristic	AMH		Univariable analysis		Multivariable analysis
Characteristic	≤1.1 ng/mL (n=30)	>1.1 ng/mL (n=57)	OR (95% CI)	P-value	OR (95% CI)	P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 25	4	26	Reference
> 25	26	31	5.45 (1.68–17.65)	0.005	15.28 (2.08–112.08)	0.007
Duration (yr)
≤ 6	13	33	Reference
> 6	17	24	1.79 (0.73–4.39)	0.198
IBD related surgery history^a
Yes	8	5	3.38 (1.11–12.86)	0.033
No	22	52	Reference
Disease behavior
B1	17	45	Reference
B2	9	7	3.40 (1.10–10.58)	0.034
B3	4	5	2.12 (0.58–8.83)	0.303
Perianal disease
Yes	12	11	2.79 (1.04–7.45)	0.041
No	18	46	Reference
Disease activity
In remission	5	39	Reference
Active disease	25	18	10.83 (3.57–32.90)	< 0.001	36.27 (4.69–147.23)	< 0.001
Location
L1	7	17	Reference
L2	6	17	0.86 (0.23–3.09)	0.814
L3	17	23	1.79 (0.61–5.29)	0.289
Upper GI location^b
Yes	6	5	2.60 (0.72–9.37)	0.144
No	24	52	Reference
Medication history
5-ASA/no treatment	3	15	Reference
Steroid/infliximab	2	7	1.43 (0.19–10.58)	0.727
AZA	10	29	1.72 (0.41–7.23)	0.456
Thalidomide	15	6	12.50 (2.63–59.47)	0.002	38.18 (4.18–348.14)	0.001

^a Defined as any surgery that comprised of a diversion, stricturoplasty, and luminal resection, anytime during the follow-up period. Perianal abscess drainage or seton placement were not included.

^b Includes all patients with upper GI tract disease associated with intestinal disease, instead of isolated upper GI disease.

AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; B, behavior; L, location; 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; AZA, azathioprine.

REFERENCES

1. Duricova D, Burisch J, Jess T, Gower-Rousseau C, Lakatos PL, ECCO-EpiCom. Age-related differences in presentation and course of inflammatory bowel disease: an update on the population-based literature. J Crohns Colitis 2014;8:1351–1361.Article PubMed PDF
2. Burisch J, Pedersen N, Čuković-Čavka S, et al. East-West gradient in the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe: the ECCO-EpiCom inception cohort. Gut 2014;63:588–597.Article PubMed
3. Dignass A, Eliakim R, Magro F, et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 1: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 2012;6:965–990.Article PubMed PDF
4. Lakatos L, Kiss LS, David G, et al. Incidence, disease phenotype at diagnosis, and early disease course in inflammatory bowel diseases in Western Hungary, 2002-2006. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:2558–2565.Article PubMed
5. Loftus CG, Loftus EV Jr, Harmsen WS, et al. Update on the incidence and prevalence of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940-2000. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:254–261.Article PubMed
6. Shivananda S, Lennard-Jones J, Logan R, et al. Incidence of in flammatory bowel disease across Europe: is there a difference between north and south? Results of the European Collaborative Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (EC-IBD). Gut 1996;39:690–697.Article PubMed PMC
7. Moum B, Vatn MH, Ekbom A, et al. Incidence of ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis in four counties of southeastern Norway, 1990-93: a prospective population-based study: the Inflammatory Bowel South-Eastern Norway (IBSEN) Study Group of Gastroenterologists. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31:362–366.Article PubMed
8. Hudson M, Flett G, Sinclair TS, Brunt PW, Templeton A, Mowat NA. Fertility and pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;58:229–237.Article PubMed
9. Khosla R, Willoughby CP, Jewell DP. Crohn’s disease and pregnancy. Gut 1984;25:52–56.Article PubMed PMC
10. Cornish JA, Tan E, Teare J, et al. The effect of restorative proctocolectomy on sexual function, urinary function, fertility, pregnancy and delivery: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1128–1138.Article PubMed
11. Mountifield R, Bampton P, Prosser R, Muller K, Andrews JM. Fear and fertility in inflammatory bowel disease: a mismatch of perception and reality affects family planning decisions. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;15:720–725.Article PubMed
12. Marri SR, Ahn C, Buchman AL. Voluntary childlessness is increased in women with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:591–599.Article PubMed
13. Johnson P, Richard C, Ravid A, et al. Female infertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1119–1126.Article PubMed
14. Olsen KO, Joelsson M, Laurberg S, Oresland T. Fertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in women with ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 1999;86:493–495.Article PubMed
15. Seiler JS. Pelvic pathology affecting fertility. Int J Fertil 1987;32:208–212.PubMed
16. Oresland T, Palmblad S, Ellström M, Berndtsson I, Crona N, Hultén L. Gynaecological and sexual function related to anatomical changes in the female pelvis after restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:77–81.Article PubMed PDF
17. McHugh SM, Rifkin IR, Deighton J, et al. The immunosuppressive drug thalidomide induces T helper cell type 2 (Th2) and concomitantly inhibits Th1 cytokine production in mitogen- and antigen-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. Clin Exp Immunol 1995;99:160–167.Article PubMed PMC
18. Arkuran C, McComb P. Crohn’s disease and tubal infertility: the effect of adhesion formation. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2000;27:12–13.PubMed
19. Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:567–576.Article PubMed PDF
20. Selinger CP, Eaden J, Selby W, et al. Patients’ knowledge of pregnancy-related issues in inflammatory bowel disease and validation of a novel assessment tool (‘CCPKnow’). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;36:57–63.Article PubMed
21. Maheshwari A, Fowler P, Bhattacharya S. Assessment of ovarian reserve: should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum Reprod 2006;21:2729–2735.Article PubMed PDF
22. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, Hunault CC, et al. Use of ovarian reserve tests for the prediction of ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained or mild male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:182–190.Article PubMed
23. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:685–718.Article PubMed PDF
24. La Marca A, Giulini S, Tirelli A, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 2007;22:766–771.Article PubMed PDF
25. La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2006;21:3103–3107.Article PubMed PDF
26. Dayal M, Sagar S, Chaurasia A, Singh U. Anti-Mullerian hormone: a new marker of ovarian function. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2014;64:130–133.Article PubMed PDF
27. Fréour T, Miossec C, Bach-Ngohou K, et al. Ovarian reserve in young women of reproductive age with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:1515–1522.Article PubMed
28. Şenateş E, Çolak Y, Erdem ED, et al. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels are lower in reproductive-age women with Crohn’s disease compared to healthy control women. J Crohns Colitis 2013;7:e29–e34.Article PubMed PDF
29. Peng X, Zhi M, Wei M, et al. Thalidomide results in diminished ovarian reserve in reproductive age female IBD patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e6540.Article PubMed PMC
30. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Giulini S, et al. Normal serum concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone in women with regular menstrual cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21:463–469.Article PubMed
31. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1616–1624.Article PubMed
32. Mearin F, Lacy BE, Chang L, et al. Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2016;150:1393–1407.Article
33. Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series,, 2008.
34. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, te Velde ER, et al. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 2002;17:3065–3071.Article PubMed PDF
35. Iwase A, Nakamura T, Nakahara T, Goto M, Kikkawa F. Anti-Müllerian hormone and assessment of ovarian reserve after ovarian toxic treatment: a systematic narrative review. Reprod Sci 2015;22:519–526.Article PubMed
36. Browne H, Armstrong A, Decherney A, et al. Assessment of ovarian function with anti-Müllerian hormone in systemic lupus erythematosus patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Fertil Steril 2009;91(4 Suppl): 1529–1532.Article PubMed
37. Henes M, Froeschlin J, Taran FA, et al. Ovarian reserve alterations in premenopausal women with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: impact of rheumatoid arthritis, Behçet’s disease and spondyloarthritis on anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54:1709–1712.Article PubMed PDF
38. Chen M, Shen B. Comparable short- and long-term outcomes of colonoscopic balloon dilation of Crohn’s disease and benign non-Crohn’s disease strictures. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:1739–1746.Article PubMed
39. Veloso FT. Clinical predictors of Crohn’s disease course. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;28:1122–1125.Article PubMed
40. Bharadwaj S, Fleshner P, Shen B. Therapeutic armamentarium for stricturing Crohn’s disease: medical versus endoscopic versus surgical approaches. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015;21:2194–2213.Article PubMed
41. Lazzerini M, Bramuzzo M, Martelossi S, Magazzù G, Pellegrino S, Ventura A. Amenorrhea in women treated with thalidomide: report of two cases and literature review. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:E10–E11.Article PubMed
42. Song T, Ma X, Gu K, et al. Thalidomide represses inflammatory response and reduces radiculopathic pain by inhibiting IRAK-1 and NF-κB/p38/JNK signaling. J Neuroimmunol 2016;290:1–8.Article PubMed
43. Amirshahrokhi K, Khalili AR. The effect of thalidomide on ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage in mice: involvement of inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide. Chem Biol Interact 2015;225:63–69.Article PubMed
44. Amirshahrokhi K. Anti-inflammatory effect of thalidomide in paraquat-induced pulmonary injury in mice. Int Immunopharmacol 2013;17:210–215.Article PubMed
45. Sharma GT, Dubey PK, Kumar GS. Effects of IGF-1, TGF-alpha plus TGF-beta1 and bFGF on in vitro survival, growth and apoptosis in FSH-stimulated buffalo (Bubalis bubalus) preantral follicles. Growth Horm IGF Res 2010;20:319–325.Article PubMed
46. Bramuzzo M, Ventura A, Martelossi S, Lazzerini M. Thalidomide for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4239.Article PubMed PMC
47. He Y, Mao R, Chen F, et al. Thalidomide induces clinical remission and mucosal healing in adults with active Crohn’s disease: a prospective open-label study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2017;10:397–406.Article PubMed PMC
48. Zhu Z, Li M, Shu X, et al. Thalidomide is a therapeutic agent that is effective in inducing and maintaining endoscopic remission in adult CD patients. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2017;41:210–216.Article PubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Global consensus statement on the management of pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease
Uma Mahadevan, Cynthia H Seow, Edward L Barnes, María Chaparro, Emma Flanagan, Sonia Friedman, Mette Julsgaard, Sunanda Kane, Siew Ng, Joana Torres, Gillian Watermeyer, Jesus Yamamoto-Furusho, Christopher Robinson, Susan Fisher, Phil Anderson, Richard Gea
Gut.2026; 75(2): 208. CrossRef
Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Uma Mahadevan, Cynthia H. Seow, Edward L. Barnes, María Chaparro, Emma Flanagan, Sonia Friedman, Mette Julsgaard, Sunanda Kane, Siew Ng, Joana Torres, Gillian Watermeyer, Jesus Yamamoto-Furusho, Christopher Robinson, Susan Fisher, Phil Anderson, Richard G
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2026; 121(1): 31. CrossRef
Inflammatory bowel disease leads to long-term ovarian dysfunction via immune-mediated follicular aging
Xiaofan Guo, Yanhui Liu, Huashan Zhao, Jinchuan Liu, Yimeng Li, Jianlin Li, Jianan Liu, Tianyi Ma, Leqian Lin, Xiaofeng Liu, Jingyin Kong, Jinju Lin, Depeng Zhao, Chi Ho Chong, Xiaoli Xie, Philip C. N. Chiu, Qingqing Zhang
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Inflammation and Ovarian Function in Reproductive‐Aged Women
Anneliese Long, Anne Z. Steiner, Amanda L. Thompson, Hannah R. Jahnke, Benjamin S. Harris, Anne Marie Jukic
American Journal of Human Biology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Chronic Intestinal Inflammation and Microbial Dysbiosis Are Associated With Female Reproductive Outcomes in a Mouse Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Maria Martell, Clare F. Quarnstrom, Alexander Khoruts, Vaiva Vezys, Christopher Staley, Eugenia Shmidt
Gastro Hep Advances.2025; 4(7): 100670. CrossRef
Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal associations between autoimmune diseases and female infertility risk
Jinyuan Wang, Haojun Long, Mingxuan Su, Yichang Cao, Runtang Zhou, Xiang Li, Jiangming Li, Yuxia Tang, Jiayi Tang, Simin Wang, Linyue Tang, Ruxin Chen, Danqi Deng, Li Tang
Reproductive Toxicology.2025; 137: 108984. CrossRef
The Evolving Role of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Measurements in Clinical Practice
Xiaochun Susan Zhang, Jaime H Noguez
The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine.2025; 10(6): 1638. CrossRef
Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Uma Mahadevan, Cynthia H Seow, Edward L Barnes, María Chaparro, Emma Flanagan, Sonia Friedman, Mette Julsgaard, Sunanda Kane, Siew Ng, Joana Torres, Gillian Watermeyer, Jesus Yamamoto-Furusho, Christopher Robinson, Susan Fisher, Phil Anderson, Richard Gea
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2025; 31(10): 2615. CrossRef
Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Uma Mahadevan, Cynthia H. Seow, Edward L. Barnes, María Chaparro, Emma Flanagan, Sonia Friedman, Mette Julsgaard, Sunanda Kane, Siew Ng, Joana Torres, Gillian Watermeyer, Jesus Yamamoto‐Furusho, Christopher Robinson, Susan Fisher, Phil Anderson, Richard G
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2025; 62(11-12): 1125. CrossRef
Correlation between serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels and radiological markers assessed using ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral endometrioma: a retrospective study in Korea
Hyun Joo Lee, Eun Hee Yu, Jong Kil Joo, Yong Jin Na
Kosin Medical Journal.2025; 40(3): 199. CrossRef
Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Uma Mahadevan, Cynthia H Seow, Edward L Barnes, María Chaparro, Emma Flanagan, Sonia Friedman, Mette Julsgaard, Sunanda Kane, Siew Ng, Joana Torres, Gillian Watermeyer, Jesus Yamamoto-Furusho, Christopher Robinson, Susan Fisher, Phil Anderson, Richard Gea
Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of Chinese Herbal Medicine on Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF Patients with Low Ovarian Reserve: A Predictive Model
Meng-Hsing Wu, Shu-Chiu Wang, Pei-Fang Su, Liang-Miin Tsai, Po-Ming Chen, Chia-Jung Li, Hsing-Ju Wu, Chiung-Hung Chang
Medicina.2025; 61(9): 1571. CrossRef
Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Uma Mahadevan, Cynthia H. Seow, Edward L. Barnes, María Chaparro, Emma Flanagan, Sonia Friedman, Mette Julsgaard, Sunanda Kane, Siew Ng, Joana Torres, Gillian Watermeyer, Jesus Yamamoto-Furusho, Christopher Robinson, Susan Fisher, Phil Anderson, Richard G
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 23(11): S1. CrossRef
Efficacy and Tolerance of Thalidomide in Patients With Very Early Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Matteo Bramuzzo, Fabiola Giudici, Serena Arrigo, Paolo Lionetti, Giovanna Zuin, Claudio Romano, Francesco Graziano, Simona Faraci, Patrizia Alvisi, Sara Signa, Luca Scarallo, Stefano Martelossi, Grazia Di Leo
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2024; 30(1): 20. CrossRef
Inhibin B and antiMüllerian hormone as surrogate markers of fertility in male and female Crohn’s disease patients: a case-control study
Ana Gutiérrez, Roser Muñoz-Pérez, Pedro Zapater, Cristina Mira, Andrés Rodríguez, Laura Sempere-Robles, María Eugenia Torregrosa, Rocio Alfayate, Violeta Moreno-Torres, Lorena Bernal, Olivia Belén-Galipienso, Jose Ignacio Cameo, Paula Sirera, Belen Herrer
Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors associated with decreased ovarian reserve in Crohn's disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Arthur Foulon, Nicolas Richard, Camille Guichard, Clara Yzet, Coraline Breuval, Jean Gondry, Rosalie Cabry‐Goubet, Audrey Michaud, Mathurin Fumery
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.2024; 103(9): 1714. CrossRef
Serum anti-mullerian hormone, sex hormone, and nutrient levels in reproductive age women with celiac disease
Ailifeire Tuerxuntayi, Tian Shi, Beiyao Gao, Yan Feng, Ting Li, Wenjia Hui, Shenglong Xue, Feng Gao
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.2024; 41(8): 2129. CrossRef
A Gender Perspective on Coloproctological Diseases: A Narrative Review on Female Disorders
Paola De Nardi, Greta Giacomel, Simone Orlandi, Giulia Poli, Mauro Pozzo, Marcella Rinaldi, Antonella Veglia, Renato Pietroletti
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(20): 6136. CrossRef
Management strategies for inflammatory bowel disease before and during pregnancy
Xu-Jie Dai, Zhen Guo
World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(11): 803. CrossRef
Inflammatory bowel disease can reduce ovarian reserve function in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin Guo, Yi Liu, Jiansheng Li, Quan Liu, Bing Liu, Xuewen Shi
Medicine.2023; 102(11): e33113. CrossRef
Inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy and breastfeeding
Max N. Brondfield, Uma Mahadevan
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 20(8): 504. CrossRef
Case report: A pregnant woman with Crohn disease who used ustekinumab to the 3rd trimester developed severe infection
Peng Guo, Wulan Cao
Medicine.2023; 102(48): e36253. CrossRef
Monitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pregnancy: A Review of the Different Modalities
Reem Al-jabri, Panu Wetwittayakhlang, Peter L. Lakatos
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(23): 7343. CrossRef
General review of pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease
Elena Santos Pérez, Marta Calvo Moya
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Reproductive Health: From Fertility to Pregnancy—A Narrative Review
Camilla Ronchetti, Federico Cirillo, Noemi Di Segni, Martina Cristodoro, Andrea Busnelli, Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
Nutrients.2022; 14(8): 1591. CrossRef
Ovarian reserve and IVF outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Honghao Sun, Jiao Jiao, Feng Tian, Qing Liu, Jiansu Bian, Rongmin Xu, Da Li, Xiuxia Wang, Hong Shu
eClinicalMedicine.2022; 50: 101517. CrossRef
Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pregnancy
Eugenia Shmidt, Marla C. Dubinsky
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 117(10S): 60. CrossRef
Reproductive Health in IBD Patients
Sanket Patel, Haleh Vaziri
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2021; 19(2): 237. CrossRef
Ovarian Reserve Assessed by the Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Reproductive Health Parameters in Women With Crohn´s Disease, a Case-Control Study
T. Koller, J. Kollerová, T. Hlavatý, B. Kadlečková, J. Payer
Physiological Research.2021; : S69. CrossRef
THE ROLE OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN A IN THE INFLAMMATORY PROCESS INVOLVING NEUTROPHILS
O.O. Prudnikov, I.M. Prudnikov, V.M. Tsyvkin, A.M. Smirnov, R.I. Yanchiy
Fiziolohichnyĭ zhurnal.2021; 67(5): 44. CrossRef
Update on Pregnancy in Patients with IBD
Rachel W. Winter, Sonia Friedman
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2020; 18(3): 423. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Risk Factors Associated with Impaired Ovarian Reserve in Young Women of Reproductive Age with Crohn’s Disease

Intest Res. 2020;18(2):200-209. Published online March 31, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.00103

XML Download

Figure

Risk Factors Associated with Impaired Ovarian Reserve in Young Women of Reproductive Age with Crohn’s Disease

Fig. 1. The comparison of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in CD patients and healthy controls. (A) The serum AMH levels of female CD patients and healthy controls. (B) The paired comparison of serum AMH level between CD patients and matched controls. (C) The serum AMH levels of female CD patients and healthy controls of different ages. aP<0.05, bP<0.001.

Fig. 2. The correlation between clinical characteristics and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in CD patients of reproductive age. (A) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease activity. (B) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease severity. (C) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease behavior. (D) Correlation between serum AMH levels and perianal lesions. (E) Correlation between serum AMH levels and disease location. (F) Correlation between serum AMH levels and medication usage. aP<0.05, bP<0.001.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Risk Factors Associated with Impaired Ovarian Reserve in Young Women of Reproductive Age with Crohn’s Disease

Characteristic	CD patient (n=87)	Control (n=87)	P-value
Age (yr)	30 (18–45)	30 (18–45)	0.933
Age distribution (yr)
18–25	31 (36)	31 (36)	1.000
26–30	20 (23)	20 (23)	1.000
31–35	16 (18)	16 (18)	1.000
36–40	10 (11)	10 (11)	1.000
41–45	10 (11)	10 (11)	1.000
Height (cm)	159.5 ± 3.5	160.7 ± 3.6	0.423
Weight (kg)	50.9 ± 6.4	54.8 ± 6.8	0.335
BMI (kg/m²)	20.4 ± 2.3	21.4 ± 2.8	0.062
Participants with children	46 (53)	56 (64)	0.915
Participants with miscarriage	5 (6)	4 (5)	0.732
Family history of GI diseases
Inflammatory disease	3 (3)	0	0.081
GI tumor	7 (8)	8 (9)	0.787
Chronic diarrhea	3 (3)	2 (2)	0.650

Characteristic	AMH		Univariable analysis		Multivariable analysis
Characteristic	≤2 ng/mL (n=38)	>2 ng/mL (n=49)	OR (95% CI)	P-value	OR (95% CI)	P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 25	6	24	Reference
> 25	32	25	5.12 (1.82–14.42)	0.002	10.03 (1.90–52.93)	0.007
Duration (yr)
≤ 6	15	26	Reference
> 6	23	23	2.64 (1.10–6.32)	0.029
IBD related surgery history^a
Yes	8	5	2.35 (0.70–7.87)	0.167
No	30	44	Reference
Disease behavior
B1	23	39	Reference
B2	11	5	3.70 (1.15–12.09)	0.028
B3	4	5	1.36 (0.33–5.57)	0.672
Perianal disease
Yes	15	8	3.34 (1.23–9.07)	0.018
No	23	41	Reference
Disease activity
In remission	7	37	Reference
Active disease	31	12	13.65 (4.79–38.91)	< 0.001	27.99 (6.13–127.95)	< 0.001
Location
L1	9	15	Reference
L2	7	16	0.73 (0.22–2.45)	0.610
L3	22	18	2.04 (0.74–5.73)	0.178
Upper GI location^b
Yes	7	4	2.54 (0.69–9.42)	0.163
No	31	45	Reference
Medication history
5-ASA/no treatment	6	12	Reference
Steroid/infliximab	3	6	1.00 (0.18–5.46)	0.999
AZA	12	27	0.89 (0.27–2.93)	0.847
Thalidomide	17	4	8.50 (1.96–36.79)	0.004	15.66 (2.22–110.65)	0.006

Characteristic	AMH		Univariable analysis		Multivariable analysis
Characteristic	≤1.1 ng/mL (n=30)	>1.1 ng/mL (n=57)	OR (95% CI)	P-value	OR (95% CI)	P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 25	4	26	Reference
> 25	26	31	5.45 (1.68–17.65)	0.005	15.28 (2.08–112.08)	0.007
Duration (yr)
≤ 6	13	33	Reference
> 6	17	24	1.79 (0.73–4.39)	0.198
IBD related surgery history^a
Yes	8	5	3.38 (1.11–12.86)	0.033
No	22	52	Reference
Disease behavior
B1	17	45	Reference
B2	9	7	3.40 (1.10–10.58)	0.034
B3	4	5	2.12 (0.58–8.83)	0.303
Perianal disease
Yes	12	11	2.79 (1.04–7.45)	0.041
No	18	46	Reference
Disease activity
In remission	5	39	Reference
Active disease	25	18	10.83 (3.57–32.90)	< 0.001	36.27 (4.69–147.23)	< 0.001
Location
L1	7	17	Reference
L2	6	17	0.86 (0.23–3.09)	0.814
L3	17	23	1.79 (0.61–5.29)	0.289
Upper GI location^b
Yes	6	5	2.60 (0.72–9.37)	0.144
No	24	52	Reference
Medication history
5-ASA/no treatment	3	15	Reference
Steroid/infliximab	2	7	1.43 (0.19–10.58)	0.727
AZA	10	29	1.72 (0.41–7.23)	0.456
Thalidomide	15	6	12.50 (2.63–59.47)	0.002	38.18 (4.18–348.14)	0.001

Table 1. Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients and Healthy Controls

Values are presented as median (range), number (%), or mean±SD.

Table 2. Univariate and Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated with Low Ovarian Reserve (AMH ≤2 ng/mL) in CD Female Patients

Defined as any surgery that comprised of a diversion, stricturoplasty, and luminal resection, anytime during the follow-up period. Perianal abscess drainage or seton placement were not included.

Includes all patients with upper GI tract disease associated with intestinal disease, instead of isolated upper GI disease.

AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; B, behavior; L, location; 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; AZA, azathioprine.

Table 3. Univariate and Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated with Low Ovarian Reserve (AMH≤1.1 ng/mL) in CD Female Patients

Defined as any surgery that comprised of a diversion, stricturoplasty, and luminal resection, anytime during the follow-up period. Perianal abscess drainage or seton placement were not included.

Includes all patients with upper GI tract disease associated with intestinal disease, instead of isolated upper GI disease.

AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; B, behavior; L, location; 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; AZA, azathioprine.