Clinical Value of Endoscopic Resection of Large Colonic PolypsUsing a Detachable Snare |
Jin Gook Huh, You Sun Kim, Sun Ok Kwon, Won Cheol Jang, Kyung Sun Ok, Tae Yeob Jeong, Soo Hyung Rye, Jung Hwan Lee, Jeong Seop Moon |
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
|
대장의 거대 용종절제술에서 박리성 올가미의 임상적 유용성 |
허진국, 김유선, 권선옥, 장원철, 옥경선, 정태엽, 류수형, 이정환, 문정섭 |
인제대학교 의과대학 서울백병원 내과학교실 |
|
Abstract |
Background/Aims A large colonic polyp is a challenge for endoscopists due to the risk of serious hemorrhage, perforation or incomplete resection. We examined whether endoscopic resection of large polyps using a detachable snare is a feasible and safe procedure. We also examined the sizes of a polyp that could be removed. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 65 cases of endoscopic resection of large colonic polyps using a detachable snare. Results: The sizes of the polyps included 3.5 cm (n=3), 3.0 to 3.4 cm (n=8), 2.0 to 2.9 cm (n=16) and 1.0 to 1.9 cm (n=38). The mean polyp size was 1.8 cm. The pathologic diagnoses of the resected polyps included 20 adenocarcinomas (30.8%), 38 adenomas (58.5%), three hyperplastic polyps, two inflammatory polyps, one hamartomatous polyp and one lymphangioma. The complete resection rate was 98.5% (64/65). There were no complications such as perforation, delayed bleeding or the need for additional surgery. Six complications of immediate bleeding (9.2%) developed after resection, but the bleeding was easily controlled by endoscopic treatment. Conclusions: According to our study, endoscopic resection of large polyps using a detachable snare can reduce not only complications of bleeding but also incomplete resection. Therefore, polyp size alone is rarely a contraindication to the endoscopic resection of a colonic polyp. (Intest Res 2007;5:151-157) |
Key Words:
Colonic Polyps, Detachable Snare, Polypectomy, Hemorrhage, Complete Resection Rate |
|