Ying-Hsiang Wang; Chi-Hsiang Chung; Tien-Yu Huang; Chao-Feng Chang; Chi-Wei Yang; Wu-Chien Chien; Yi-Chiao Cheng

doi:10.5217/ir.2023.00078

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Intest Res > Volume 23(1); 2025 > Article

Original Article IBD Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide population‑based cohort study: Ying-Hsiang Wang¹, Chi-Hsiang Chung², Tien-Yu Huang³, Chao-Feng Chang³, Chi-Wei Yang³, Wu-Chien Chien^2,4, Yi-Chiao Cheng¹; Intestinal Research 2025;23(1):76-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00078
Published online: February 21, 2024

¹Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

²School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

³Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

⁴Department of Medical Research, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

Correspondence to Yi-Chiao Cheng, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan. Tel: +886-2-87927209, Fax: +886-2-87927411, E-mail: ndmcjoe@gmail.com

Co-Correspondence to Wu-Chien Chien, Department of Medical Research, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan. Tel: +886-2-87927209, Fax: +886-2-87927411, E-mail: chienwu@mail.ndmctsgh.edu.tw

• Received: July 4, 2023 • Revised: December 7, 2023 • Accepted: December 22, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

7,831 Views
348 Download
5 Web of Science
5 Crossref
5 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
NOTES
Supplementary Material
REFERENCES

See letter "Elucidating the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease: a focus on systemic inflammation" in Volume 23 on page 3.

Abstract

Background/Aims
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common disease with severe inflammatory processes associated with numerous gastrointestinal diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, we investigated the relationship between NAFLD and IBD and the possible risk factors associated with the diagnosis of IBD.
Methods
This longitudinal nationwide cohort study investigated the risk of IBD in patients with NAFLD alone. General characteristics, comorbidities, and incidence of IBD were also compared.
Results
Patients diagnosed with NAFLD had a significant risk of developing IBD compared to control individuals, who were associated with a 2.245-fold risk of the diagnosis of IBD and a 2.260- and 2.231-fold of increased diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, respectively (P< 0.001). The cumulative risk of IBD increased annually during the follow-up of patients with NAFLD (P< 0.001).
Conclusions
Our results emphasize that NAFLD significantly impacts its incidence in patients with NAFLD. If patients with NAFLD present with risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, these conditions should be properly treated with regular follow-ups. Furthermore, we believe that these causes may be associated with the second peak of IBD.
Keywords: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; Ulcerative colitis; Crohn disease

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a disease with severe inflammatory processes related to many gastrointestinal diseases, with a reported global prevalence of 25% to 30% [1]. Several factors are associated with NAFLD development, including obesity, diet, sedentary lifestyle, and hyperlipidemia. NAFLD diagnosis and treatment is challenging, considering that approximately 51% of patients with NAFLD are obese, 22% have type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), 79% have hyperlipidemia, 39% have hypertension, and 42% experience some form of metabolic syndrome [1].

In contrast, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, relapsing, and remitting intestinal disorder typically categorized into 2 subtypes as follows: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) [2]. The highest prevalence of IBD is documented in Europe and North America. Additionally, IBD incidence has increased substantially since 1990 in newly industrialized countries across Africa, Asia, and South America, when they became more Westernized.3,4 In Taiwan, an increasing incidence of IBD (both UC and CD) and a decreasing UC-to-CD ratio, particularly among patients aged 20–39 years, has been reported from 2001 to 2015 [5]. However, both diseases are caused by severe inflammatory processes, with only a few studies reviewing the relationship between NAFLD and IBD [6].

More than 99% of Taiwan’s population (including foreigners) is enrolled in the single-payer National Health Insurance program, whose National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) contains the registration files and the original claim data for reimbursement. However, the use of the NHIRD is limited to research purposes, and applicants must follow the related laws and regulations of Taiwan. Therefore, using the NHIRD, we investigated the association between NAFLD and IBD and the possible risk factors associated with NAFLD in patients with IBD.

METHODS

1. Data Source

This retrospective population-based cohort study contained fully anonymized medical records extracted from the NHIRD from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015. All patient demographics (including age, sex, urbanization, season, and related comorbidities) were recorded and analyzed.

2. Patient Selection

The International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) was used to identify the study population diagnosed with IBD (ICD-9-CM codes 555 and 556). Patients aged ≥ 18 years who had received ICD-9-CM codes 555 and 556 once during hospitalization or at least three times during outpatient visits were included. In contrast, patients diagnosed with NAFLD (ICD-9-CM codes 571.5, 571.8, and 571.9) before January 1, 2000, or without complete tracking and unknown sex, were excluded. We also excluded patients diagnosed with IBD or IBD-related disease before NAFLD. Furthermore, we selected a group of patients without NAFLD during the study period as a comparison cohort using similar exclusion criteria. This control group was four times the number of patients in the IBD group and was matched to the patient’s sex, age, and inclusion date. Patients were followed up until IBD incidence was found in the records of outpatient or inpatient visits or until the end of the study period (December 31, 2015).

3. Comorbidities

We identified the following baseline comorbidities: DM, histo‑ ry of pancreatoduodenal resection, hypothyroidism, polycys‑ tic ovary syndrome (PCOS), hypogonadism, dyslipidemia, obesity (body mass index 30.0–40.0 kg/m2; morbidity obesity, body mass index > 40.0 kg/m2), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Supplementary Table 1 lists the ICD-9-CM codes used for data extraction and analysis.

4. Statistical Analyses

SPSS software (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all the analyses. We analyzed the characteristics of patients and compared them between the IBD and control (without IBD) groups, considering both baseline and endpoint for this cohort. Categorical and continuous variables were reported as numbers and percentages and mean ± standard deviation, respectively. Continuous variables in the 2 groups were compared using an independent Student t-test, whereas Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate the differences in categorical variables. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between potential clinical variables, including sex, age group, season, urbanization, and related comorbidities, and IBD development were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Furthermore, the cumulative risk of IBD development between the 2 cohorts was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared employing the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P< 0.05.

5. Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (TSGHIRB No. E202316009). The written informed consent was waived.

RESULTS

Fig. 1 shows the flowchart of the patient selection process used in this cohort. In total, 60,298 patients with NAFLD were identified from the NHIRD database comprising 1,949,101 individuals from 2000 to 2015 in Taiwan. A study cohort of 45,403 patients with NAFLD was selected for further analyses after excluding 14,895 patients. Subsequently, a 4-fold group of 181,612 individuals matched by sex, age, and index date was selected as the control cohort.

Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of the enrolled patients at baseline. Overall, 227,015 individuals, including 45,403 patients with NAFLD and 181,612 without NAFLD, were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period in all patients and those with IBD was 8.80 ± 5.67 years and 6.82 ± 6.37 years, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). Among all age groups, most patients (26.02%) were aged 30–39 years. The mean age of patients with and without NAFLD was 41.26 ± 15.10 and 41.39 ± 15.21 years, respectively. Regarding the associated comorbidities, post-pancreaticoduodenal resection, hypothyroidism, DM, PCOS, dyslipidemia, obesity, and OSA were found to be significantly more prevalent (all P< 0.001) in patients with NAFLD than in those without NAFLD. Table 2 presents the characteristics of the clinical endpoints. Significant differences in age, season, location, urbanization level, care level, and multiple comorbidities (all P< 0.001) were found between patients with and without NAFLD. Fig. 2 shows the KaplanMeier curve for the cumulative risks of developing IBD stratified by NAFLD using the log-rank test. The cumulative risk of IBD development was significantly higher in patients without NAFLD than in those with NAFLD (P< 0.001 log-rank test).

Table 3 shows the adjusted HR (aHR) of IBD stratified by the variables listed in the table using Cox regression. Patients with coexisting NAFLD had a 2.245-fold increased risk of IBD compared with those without NAFLD. Significant differences (P< 0.001) existed in all confounding factors, including male sex (aHR, 2.312), age (aHR, 2.029–2.379), season (aHR, 2.132–2.404), urbanization level (aHR, 2.165–2.295), and comorbidities, such as post-pancreaticoduodenal resection, DM, PCOS, dyslipidemia, obesity, and OSA. Regarding the IBD subgroup, patients with coexisting NAFLD had a 2.260- and 2.231-fold increased risk of UC and CD, respectively, compared with those without NAFLD (Table 4). For the NAFLD grade, patients with NAFLD and liver cirrhosis (aHR, 2.349) had a statistically higher risk of developing IBD than those without liver cirrhosis (aHR, 2.191) (Table 5). In cases where patients may be underdiagnosed with NAFLD or IBD, a sensitivity test was conducted to exclude those diagnosed with both NAFLD and IBD within 6 months, and patients with NAFLD should be associated with the diagnosis of IBD (Supplementary Table 3).

DISCUSSION

Although only a few small-scale studies have reviewed the association between IBD and NAFLD, our study is one of the first large retrospective studies, including 16-year longitudinal analyses, that employed data obtained from the Taiwan NHIRD to investigate the relationship between NAFLD and IBD. Our results showed that patients with NAFLD should be associated with the diagnosis of IBD compared with those without NAFLD. Additionally, the presence of pancreaticoduodenal resection, DM, PCOS, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypogonadism, OSA, higher urbanization level, and winter season were risk factors for IBD development.

NAFLD is a disease characterized by excess fat accumulation in a patient’s liver without a history of alcohol abuse or other causes of secondary hepatic steatosis; it is associated with severe inflammatory processes linked to several gastroenterological diseases, with a reported prevalence of 25% worldwide [1,7]. NAFLD demonstrates a spectrum of steatohepatitis, steatonecrosis, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [8,9]. Specifically, steatonecrosis and NASH have been reported to possibly lead to an aggressive course, which consequently causes liver fibrosis or cirrhosis [10]. Leptin and adiponectin play important roles in NAFLD etiology since leptin is believed to act as a pro-inflammatory factor that increases hepatotoxicity by regulating cytokine production and T-cell activation [11]. Additionally, leptin augments the oxidation of fatty acids in the liver by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and increasing NAFLD severity [12]. In contrast, adiponectin enhances glucose and fatty acid oxidation, improves insulin sensitivity, and plays a role in the hepatoprotective effects of adiponectin, including antisteatotic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrogenic effects [13]. However, adiponectin levels are reduced in patients with NAFLD, causing steatosis, necroinflammation, and fibrosis [14].

Lipotoxicity of accumulated lipids and activation of the innate immune system, including C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and osteopontin, amplify the induction of NASH [15,16]. Persistent liver lipid deposition is associated with subsequent inflammatory processes and consequences, and this inflammatory process causes NAFLD and is associated with other systemic diseases [17].

Although potential factors include genetic predisposition, environmental conditions, and immunological dysfunctions, the exact etiopathogenesis of IBD remains unknown [18]. A decrease in the mRNA levels of leptin and adiponectin in the mesenteric adipose tissue and an increase in the inflammatory factors have been reported in patients with IBD [19]. Al-Hassi et al. [20] also demonstrated that leptin causes mesenteric obesity and inflammation in CD. However, adiponectin has been reported to maintain intestinal homeostasis, protect against murine colitis, and alleviate murine colonic injury [21].

Fousekis et al. [22] reported an association between IBD and NAFLD, revealing that 14.2% of the patients with CD and 26.2% of those with UC had NAFLD. Wald [23] demonstrated a statistically higher prevalence of NAFLD in patients with IBD. Our study similarly showed a statistically significant increase in the risk of NAFLD in patients with IBD. Although some reports have shown an association with the adipokine profile, this link between IBD and NAFLD remains unclear [17]. In addition to leptin and adiponectin, apelin has been suggested to play a key role in NAFLD by promoting liver fibrosis [24,25]. Furthermore, a recently published meta-analysis, including 1 and 18 studies from Japan and Western countries, respectively, found an overall prevalence of NAFLD in 27.5% of patients with IBD and identified type 2 DM, obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome as risk factors for its development [26]. Hoffmann et al. [27] reported that advanced age was related to a higher risk of NAFLD in patients with CD, whereas the highest risk of NAFLD in our study was reported in those with IBD aged 50–59 years.

Our study demonstrates that some risk factors in patients with NAFLD that may develop IBD were identified using multivariate Cox regression, including winter season, higher urbanization level, history of pancreatoduodenectomy, presence of DM, dyslipidemia, hypogonadism, obesity, and OSA. Additionally, Principi et al. [28] reported that DM and metabolic syndrome are risk factors for developing NAFLD-associated IBD. A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of new-onset DM in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy [29], and we believe this may be why those with NAFLD undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy have an increased risk of developing IBD. Our report showed that hypogonadism is associated with a more than 3-fold increased risk of developing IBD. In fact, Szathmári reported that 40% of male patients with IBD had coexisting hypogonadism [30]. Whereas Gesthimani Mintziori demonstrated that sex steroid played an important role in hepatic lipid homeostasis and may have protective effect to liver. And high NAFLD risk in hypogonadism patients regardless of men and women [31]. McGowan et al. [32] previously reported the improvement of therapies and nutritional status as the cause of obesity among the IBD population, with a direct relationship between prolonged remission and a higher risk of NAFLD development. Moreover, Greuter et al. [33] reported differences in the gender epidemiology of CD, noting a male predominance in Asia and a female predominance in Europe and the United States. Regarding the relationship between urbanization, season, and IBD, Soon et al. [34] showed that urbanization is a major risk factor for IBD development. Koido et al. [35] also reported that winter and spring may increase the risk of developing UC. According to the results of our large cohort study and previous studies, the abovementioned risk factors may be pertinent for patients with NAFLD and IBD. Although the second peak age of IBD reportedly occurred in 50- to 70-year-old patients, the exact reason remains controversial [36]. Our study showed that 50- to 59-year-old patients had a statistically higher risk of developing IBD. Therefore, the abovementioned risk factors or NAFLD may be related to the second peak of IBD.

This study has several strengths. First, this was a nationwide population-based cohort study using a million-level database in Taiwan. Given its large sample size and long-term follow-up period, the study provided relatively good statistical power for this rare disease in patients with IBD. Second, a 4-fold control group matched by sex, age, and index date was selected for comparison. Possible confounding factors were also adjusted during the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Nevertheless, this study had some limitations. First, almost all study participants were Taiwanese, resulting in poor generalizability and broader application of the study results for patients from other racial or ethnic groups. Second, the medications prescribed (either for IBD or other comorbidity diseases, e.g., DM) were not stratified in this study; consequently, the influence of medication treatment could not be ruled out. Third, by NHIRD, we could only record the ICD code of NAFLD and the records lack of pathological confirmation. Meanwhile, NAFLD prevalence may be underdiagnosed for patients who do not seek medical attention or lack NAFLD diagnosis coding. Fourth, we could only classify patients with NAFLD with or without liver cirrhosis, and no ICD code exists for the NAFLD subgroups, such as NASH. Consequently, we lacked analysis of the NAFLD subgroups developing IBD. No ultimate treatment for IBD exists, and treatment-related side effects should be considered individually. However, no reported correlation with NAFLD among the current treatments for IBD exists. Therefore, either treatment-related complications or the possible protective effects of IBD drugs on NAFLD development require further investigation. Finally, this study found a significantly higher risk of developing NAFLD in patients with IBD after adjusting for confounding factors. However, the exact interaction between NAFLD and IBD remains unclear. This may be multifactorial and requires further investigation.

In conclusion, patients in this cohort with NAFLD may have an increased risk of subsequent IBD development. Specifically, patients with NAFLD and liver cirrhosis may have a higher risk of developing IBD. The risk of IBD development in patients with NAFLD with some comorbidities, such as DM and dyslipidemia, was also significantly higher than that for those without these risk factors. When patients with NAFLD present with the abovementioned risk factors, they should be carefully treated and regularly followed. Furthermore, these risk factors may be related to the “second peak of IBD.”

NOTES

Funding Source

This study was supported by the Tri-Service General Hospital Research Foundation (TSGH-B-112020), and the sponsor has no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Cheng YC. Data curation: Wang YH, Chien WC. Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology: Chung CH, Chien WC. Project administration: Cheng YC. Resources: Huang TY, Chang CF, Yang CW. Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization: Chung CH, Chien WC. Writing - original draft: Wang YH. Writing - review & editing: Cheng YC. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

Additional Contributions

We appreciate the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare (HWDC, MOHW), Taiwan, for providing the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at the Intestinal Research website (https://www.irjournal.org).

Supplementary Table 1.

ICD-9-CM Codes Used for Date Extraction and Analysis

ir-2023-00078-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf

Supplementary Table 2.

Periods of Follow-up and Years to IBD

ir-2023-00078-Supplementary-Table-2.pdf

Supplementary Table 3.

Sensitivity Test for Factors of IBD Subgroups Using Cox Regression with versus without (Reference) NAFLD

ir-2023-00078-Supplementary-Table-3.pdf

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of the patient selection in this cohort. NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; IBD, Inflammatory bowel disease.

Fig. 2.

Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative risks of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among patients aged ≥18 years, stratified by nonalcoholic fatty live disease (NAFLD) using the log-rank test. Zero of the X-axis was defined as the disease name of NAFLD registered in the database. Furthermore, the observation starting point for the non-NAFLD group is similar to that for the study group.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Patients Enrolled

Demographic	Total (n = 227,015)	NAFLD group (n = 45,403)	Control group (n = 181,612)	P-value
Male sex	125,215 (55.2)	25,043 (55.2)	100,172 (55.2)	0.999
Age (yr)	41.36 ± 15.19	41.3 ± 15.1	41.4 ± 15.2	0.103
Age group (yr)				0.999
18–29	26,490 (11.7)	5,298 (11.7)	21,198 (11.7)
30–39	59,070 (26.0)	11,814 (26.0)	47,256 (26.0)
40–49	50,160 (22.1)	10,032 (22.1)	40,128 (22.1)
50–59	48,825 (21.5)	9,765 (21.5)	39,060 (21.5)
≥ 60	42,470 (18.7)	8,494 (18.7)	33,976 (18.7)
Urbanization level				< 0.001
1 (the highest)	66,214 (29.2)	12,204 (26.9)	54,010 (29.7)
2	72,911 (32.1)	15,010 (33.1)	57,901 (31.9)
3	40,634 (17.9)	8,344 (18.4)	32,290 (17.8)
4	47,256 (20.8)	9,845 (21.7)	37,411 (20.6)
Season				0.999
Spring	55,050 (24.3)	11,010 (24.3)	44,040 (24.3)
Summer	60,935 (26.8)	12,187 (26.8)	48,748 (26.9)
Autumn	59,905 (26.4)	11,981 (26.4)	47,924 (26.4)
Winter	51,125 (22.5)	10,225 (22.5)	40,900 (22.5)
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus	41,910 (18.5)	9,896 (21.8)	32,014 (17.6)	< 0.001
Dyslipidemia	24,370 (10.7)	6,869 (15.1)	17,501 (9.6)	< 0.001
Obesity	7,491 (3.3)	2,511 (5.5)	4,980 (2.7)	< 0.001
Morbid obesity	4,512 (2.0)	1,498 (3.3)	3,014 (1.7)	< 0.001
OSA	20,609 (9.1)	4,522 (10.0)	16,087 (8.9)	< 0.001
PCOS	2,458 (1.1)	597 (1.3)	1,861 (1.0)	< 0.001
Hypothyroidism	9,764 (4.3)	1,978 (4.4)	7,786 (4.3)	0.518
Hypogonadism	617 (0.3)	119 (0.3)	498 (0.3)	0.687
PD resection	4,686 (2.1)	989 (2.2)	3,697 (2.0)	0.057

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PD resection, post-pancreaticoduodenal resection.

Table 2.

Characteristics of Study in the Endpoint

Demographic	Total (n = 227,015)	NAFLD group (n = 45,403)	Control group (n = 181,612)	P-value
Inflammatory bowel disease	1,810 (0.8)	517 (1.1)	1,293 (0.7)	0.016
Male sex	125,215 (55.2)	25,043 (55.2)	100,172 (55.2)	0.999
Age (yr)	50.2 ± 16.7	49.5 ± 16.2	50.3 ± 16.8	< 0.001
Age group (yr)				0.999
18–29	25,390 (11.2)	5,270 (11.6)	20,120 (11.1)
30–39	56,092 (24.7)	10,972 (24.2)	45,120 (24.8)
40–49	48,669 (21.4)	9,986 (22.0)	38,683 (21.3)
50–59	46,743 (20.6)	9,733 (21.4)	37,010 (20.4)
≥ 60	50,121 (22.1)	9,442 (20.8)	40,679 (22.4)
Urbanization level				< 0.001
1 (the highest)	66,297 (29.2)	12,401 (27.3)	53,896 (29.7)
2	71,001 (31.3)	14,989 (33.0)	56,012 (30.8)
3	40,634 (17.9)	8,297 (18.3)	32,441 (17.9)
4	47,256 (20.8)	9,716 (21.4)	39,263 (21.6)
Season				0.999
Spring	55,021 (24.2)	10,986 (24.2)	44,035 (24.3)
Summer	59,942 (26.4)	12,886 (28.4)	47,056 (25.9)
Autumn	56,476 (24.9)	10,875 (24.0)	45,601 (25.1)
Winter	55,579 (24.5)	10,656 (23.4)	44,920 (24.7)
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus	43,032 (19.0)	9,986 (22.0)	33,046 (18.2)	< 0.001
Dyslipidemia	25,071 (11.0)	7,011 (15.4)	18,060 (9.9)	< 0.001
Obesity	7,625 (3.4)	2,603 (5.7)	5,022 (2.8)	< 0.001
Morbid obesity	4,548 (2.0)	1,513 (3.3)	3,035 (1.7)	< 0.001
OSA	20,718 (9.1)	4,597 (10.1)	16,121 (8.9)	< 0.001
PCOS	2,656 (1.2)	684 (1.5)	1,972 (1.1)	< 0.001
Hypothyroidism	9,929 (4.4)	2,126 (4.7)	7,803 (4.3)	< 0.001
Hypogonadism	641 (0.3)	134 (0.3)	507 (0.3)	0.553
PD resection	4,789 (2.1)	1,068 (2.4)	3,721 (2.1)	< 0.001

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PD resection, post-pancreaticoduodenal resection.

Table 3.

Risk Factors of Inflammatory Bowel Disease between NAFLD and Non-NAFLD Groups Stratified by Variables

Variable	Adjusted HR (95% CI)	P-value
Sex
Male	2.312 (1.622–2.981)	< 0.001
Female	2.160 (1.515–2.784)	< 0.001
Age group (yr)
18–29	2.029 (1.423–2.615)	< 0.001
30–39	2.291 (1.607–2.953)	< 0.001
40–49	2.305 (1.617–2.971)	< 0.001
50–59	2.379 (1.669–3.067)	< 0.001
≥ 60	2.106 (1.477–2.715)	< 0.001
Urbanization level
1 (the highest)	2.295 (1.610–2.959)	< 0.001
2	2.274 (1.595–2.931)	< 0.001
3	2.211 (1.551–2.851)	< 0.001
4	2.165 (1.519–2.791)	< 0.001
Season
Spring	2.132 (1.496–2.748)	< 0.001
Summer	2.191 (1.537–2.825)	< 0.001
Autumn	2.262 (1.587–2.915)	< 0.001
Winter	2.404 (1.686–3.098)	< 0.001
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus	2.528 (1.774–3.259)	< 0.001
Dyslipidemia	2.333 (1.637–3.008)	< 0.001
Obesity	2.406 (1.688–3.101)	< 0.001
Morbid obesity	2.530 (1.786-3.249)	< 0.001
OSA	2.334 (1.638–3.009)	< 0.001
PCOS	2.482 (1.741–3.199)	< 0.001
Hypothyroidism	2.259 (1.585–2.912)	< 0.001
Hypogonadism	3.183 (2.233–4.104)	< 0.001
PD resection	2.716 (1.906–3.502)	< 0.001

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PD resection, post-pancreaticoduodenal resection.

Table 4.

Factors of IBD Subgroups Using Cox Regression with versus without (Reference) NAFLD

Variable	Adjusted HR (95% CI)	P-value
Overall IBD	2.245 (1.575–2.894)	< 0.001
Ulcerative colitis	2.260 (1.584–2.913)	< 0.001
Crohn’s disease	2.231 (1.562–2.876)	< 0.001

IBD, Inflammatory bowel disease; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 5.

Factors of Inflammatory Bowel Disease among NAFLD with/without Liver Cirrhosis Using Cox Regression

Variable	Adjusted HR (95% CI)	P-value
Overall NAFLD	2.245 (1.575–2.894)	< 0.001
Without cirrhosis	2.191 (1.533–2.821)	< 0.001
With cirrhosis	2.349 (1.648–3.027)	< 0.001

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

REFERENCES

1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016;64:73–84.Article PubMed
2. Graham DB, Xavier RJ. Pathway paradigms revealed from the genetics of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2020;578:527–539.Article PubMed PMC PDF
3. GBD 2017 Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:17–30.PubMed
4. Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2017;390:2769–2778.Article PubMed
5. Yen HH, Weng MT, Tung CC, et al. Epidemiological trend in inflammatory bowel disease in Taiwan from 2001 to 2015: a nationwide populationbased study. Intest Res 2019;17:54–62.Article PubMed PMC PDF
6. Ritaccio G, Stoleru G, Abutaleb A, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is common in IBD patients however progression to hepatic fibrosis by noninvasive markers is rare. Dig Dis Sci 2021;66:3186–3191.Article PubMed PMC PDF
7. Stojsavljević S, Gomerčić Palčić M, Virović Jukić L, Smirčić Duvnjak L, Duvnjak M. Adipokines and proinflammatory cytokines, the key mediators in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:18070–18091.Article PubMed PMC
8. Schaffner F, Thaler H. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Prog Liver Dis 1986;8:283–298.PubMed
9. Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill DB, Oh BJ. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease. Mayo Clin Proc 1980;55:434–438.Article PubMed
10. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1413–1419.Article PubMed
11. Sennello JA, Fayad R, Morris AM, et al. Regulation of T cellmediated hepatic inflammation by adiponectin and leptin. Endocrinology 2005;146:2157–2164.Article PubMed PDF
12. Giby VG, Ajith TA. Role of adipokines and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Hepatol 2014;6:570–579.Article PubMed PMC
13. Shabani P, Emamgholipour S, Doosti M. CTRP1 in liver disease. Adv Clin Chem 2017;79:1–23.Article PubMed
14. Balmer ML, Joneli J, Schoepfer A, Stickel F, Thormann W, Dufour JF. Significance of serum adiponectin levels in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 2010;119:431–436.Article PubMed PMC PDF
15. Tarantino G, Savastano S, Colao A. Hepatic steatosis, lowgrade chronic inflammation and hormone/growth factor/adipokine imbalance. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:4773–4783.Article PubMed PMC
16. Gao B, Tsukamoto H. Inflammation in alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: friend or foe? Gastroenterology 2016;150:1704–1709.Article PubMed PMC
17. Chang ML, Yang Z, Yang SS. Roles of adipokines in digestive diseases: markers of inflammation, metabolic alteration and disease progression. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:8308.Article PubMed PMC
18. Barnes EL, Loftus EV Jr, Kappelman MD. Effects of race and ethnicity on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 2021;160:677–689.Article PubMed
19. Olivier I, Theodorou V, Valet P, Castan-Laurell I, Ferrier L, Eutamène H. Modifications of mesenteric adipose tissue during moderate experimental colitis in mice. Life Sci 2014;94:1–7.Article PubMed
20. Al-Hassi HO, Bernardo D, Murugananthan AU, et al. A mechanistic role for leptin in human dendritic cell migration: differences between ileum and colon in health and Crohn’s disease. Mucosal Immunol 2013;6:751–761.Article PubMed PMC PDF
21. Obeid S, Wankell M, Charrez B, et al. Adiponectin confers protection from acute colitis and restricts a B cell immune response. J Biol Chem 2017;292:6569–6582.Article PubMed PMC
22. Fousekis FS, Katsanos KH, Theopistos VI, et al. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases: a referral center study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19:48.Article PubMed PMC PDF
23. Wald A. Is chronic use of stimulant laxatives harmful to the colon? J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;36:386–389.Article PubMed
24. Wang Y, Song J, Bian H, et al. Apelin promotes hepatic fibrosis through ERK signaling in LX-2 cells. Mol Cell Biochem 2019;460:205–215.Article PubMed PMC PDF
25. Han S, Wang G, Qiu S, et al. Increased colonic apelin production in rodents with experimental colitis and in humans with IBD. Regul Pept 2007;142:131–137.Article PubMed
26. Zou ZY, Shen B, Fan JG. Systematic review with meta-analysis: epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019;25:1764–1772.Article PubMed PDF
27. Hoffmann P, Jung V, Behnisch R, Gauss A. Prevalence and risk factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:7367–7381.Article PubMed PMC
28. Principi M, Iannone A, Losurdo G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence and risk factors. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018;24:1589–1596.Article PubMed
29. Beger HG, Mayer B, Poch B. Resection of the duodenum causes long-term endocrine and exocrine dysfunction after Whipple procedure for benign tumors: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2020;22:809–820.Article PubMed
30. Szathmári M, Vásárhelyi B, Treszl A, Tulassay T, Tulassay Z. Association of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and testosterone deficiency with bone turnover in men with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002;17:63–66.Article PubMed PDF
31. Mintziori G, Poulakos P, Tsametis C, Goulis DG. Hypogonadism and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Minerva Endocrinol 2017;42:145–150.Article PubMed
32. McGowan CE, Jones P, Long MD, Barritt AS 4th. Changing shape of disease: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Crohn’s disease: a case series and review of the literature. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:49–54.Article PubMed PMC
33. Greuter T, Manser C, Pittet V, Vavricka SR, Biedermann L, on behalf of Swiss IBDnet, an official working group of the Swiss Society of Gastroenterology. Gender differences in inflammatory bowel disease. Digestion 2020;101(Suppl 1): 98–104.Article PubMed PDF
34. Soon IS, Molodecky NA, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Barkema HW, Kaplan GG. The relationship between urban environment and the inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2012;12:51.Article PubMed PMC PDF
35. Koido S, Ohkusa T, Saito H, et al. Seasonal variations in the onset of ulcerative colitis in Japan. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:9063–9068.Article PubMed PMC
36. Johnston RD, Logan RF. What is the peak age for onset of IBD? Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008;14(Suppl 2): S4–S5.Article PubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Bidirectional interplay between gut and liver in inflammatory bowel disease and hepatobiliary conditions
Ali Abdulla, Ayan M. Sheikhnoor, Kevin Ferrao, Lucy I. Stiles, Kosha J. Mehta
Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Elucidating the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease: a focus on systemic inflammation
Sihyun Kim, Jong Pil Im
Intestinal Research.2025; 23(1): 3. CrossRef
Metabolic Disorders and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Hye Kyung Hyun, Jae Hee Cheon
Gut and Liver.2025; 19(3): 307. CrossRef
Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathophysiology to Precision Therapeutics
Balachandar Selvakumar, Rani Samsudin
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2025; 31(12): 3450. CrossRef
Multiomics analysis reveals the potential mechanism of high‐fat diet in dextran sulfate sodium‐induced colitis mice model
Yuyang Zhao, Zhimin Chen, Ruiyi Dong, Yufan Liu, Yixin Zhang, Yan Guo, Meiyi Yu, Xiang Li, Jiangbin Wang
Food Science & Nutrition.2024; 12(10): 8309. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide population‑based cohort study

Intest Res. 2025;23(1):76-84. Published online February 21, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00078

XML Download

Figure

Related articles

Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide population‑based cohort study

Fig. 1. Flowchart of the patient selection in this cohort. NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; IBD, Inflammatory bowel disease.

Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative risks of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among patients aged ≥18 years, stratified by nonalcoholic fatty live disease (NAFLD) using the log-rank test. Zero of the X-axis was defined as the disease name of NAFLD registered in the database. Furthermore, the observation starting point for the non-NAFLD group is similar to that for the study group.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide population‑based cohort study

Demographic	Total (n = 227,015)	NAFLD group (n = 45,403)	Control group (n = 181,612)	P-value
Male sex	125,215 (55.2)	25,043 (55.2)	100,172 (55.2)	0.999
Age (yr)	41.36 ± 15.19	41.3 ± 15.1	41.4 ± 15.2	0.103
Age group (yr)				0.999
18–29	26,490 (11.7)	5,298 (11.7)	21,198 (11.7)
30–39	59,070 (26.0)	11,814 (26.0)	47,256 (26.0)
40–49	50,160 (22.1)	10,032 (22.1)	40,128 (22.1)
50–59	48,825 (21.5)	9,765 (21.5)	39,060 (21.5)
≥ 60	42,470 (18.7)	8,494 (18.7)	33,976 (18.7)
Urbanization level				< 0.001
1 (the highest)	66,214 (29.2)	12,204 (26.9)	54,010 (29.7)
2	72,911 (32.1)	15,010 (33.1)	57,901 (31.9)
3	40,634 (17.9)	8,344 (18.4)	32,290 (17.8)
4	47,256 (20.8)	9,845 (21.7)	37,411 (20.6)
Season				0.999
Spring	55,050 (24.3)	11,010 (24.3)	44,040 (24.3)
Summer	60,935 (26.8)	12,187 (26.8)	48,748 (26.9)
Autumn	59,905 (26.4)	11,981 (26.4)	47,924 (26.4)
Winter	51,125 (22.5)	10,225 (22.5)	40,900 (22.5)
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus	41,910 (18.5)	9,896 (21.8)	32,014 (17.6)	< 0.001
Dyslipidemia	24,370 (10.7)	6,869 (15.1)	17,501 (9.6)	< 0.001
Obesity	7,491 (3.3)	2,511 (5.5)	4,980 (2.7)	< 0.001
Morbid obesity	4,512 (2.0)	1,498 (3.3)	3,014 (1.7)	< 0.001
OSA	20,609 (9.1)	4,522 (10.0)	16,087 (8.9)	< 0.001
PCOS	2,458 (1.1)	597 (1.3)	1,861 (1.0)	< 0.001
Hypothyroidism	9,764 (4.3)	1,978 (4.4)	7,786 (4.3)	0.518
Hypogonadism	617 (0.3)	119 (0.3)	498 (0.3)	0.687
PD resection	4,686 (2.1)	989 (2.2)	3,697 (2.0)	0.057

Demographic	Total (n = 227,015)	NAFLD group (n = 45,403)	Control group (n = 181,612)	P-value
Inflammatory bowel disease	1,810 (0.8)	517 (1.1)	1,293 (0.7)	0.016
Male sex	125,215 (55.2)	25,043 (55.2)	100,172 (55.2)	0.999
Age (yr)	50.2 ± 16.7	49.5 ± 16.2	50.3 ± 16.8	< 0.001
Age group (yr)				0.999
18–29	25,390 (11.2)	5,270 (11.6)	20,120 (11.1)
30–39	56,092 (24.7)	10,972 (24.2)	45,120 (24.8)
40–49	48,669 (21.4)	9,986 (22.0)	38,683 (21.3)
50–59	46,743 (20.6)	9,733 (21.4)	37,010 (20.4)
≥ 60	50,121 (22.1)	9,442 (20.8)	40,679 (22.4)
Urbanization level				< 0.001
1 (the highest)	66,297 (29.2)	12,401 (27.3)	53,896 (29.7)
2	71,001 (31.3)	14,989 (33.0)	56,012 (30.8)
3	40,634 (17.9)	8,297 (18.3)	32,441 (17.9)
4	47,256 (20.8)	9,716 (21.4)	39,263 (21.6)
Season				0.999
Spring	55,021 (24.2)	10,986 (24.2)	44,035 (24.3)
Summer	59,942 (26.4)	12,886 (28.4)	47,056 (25.9)
Autumn	56,476 (24.9)	10,875 (24.0)	45,601 (25.1)
Winter	55,579 (24.5)	10,656 (23.4)	44,920 (24.7)
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus	43,032 (19.0)	9,986 (22.0)	33,046 (18.2)	< 0.001
Dyslipidemia	25,071 (11.0)	7,011 (15.4)	18,060 (9.9)	< 0.001
Obesity	7,625 (3.4)	2,603 (5.7)	5,022 (2.8)	< 0.001
Morbid obesity	4,548 (2.0)	1,513 (3.3)	3,035 (1.7)	< 0.001
OSA	20,718 (9.1)	4,597 (10.1)	16,121 (8.9)	< 0.001
PCOS	2,656 (1.2)	684 (1.5)	1,972 (1.1)	< 0.001
Hypothyroidism	9,929 (4.4)	2,126 (4.7)	7,803 (4.3)	< 0.001
Hypogonadism	641 (0.3)	134 (0.3)	507 (0.3)	0.553
PD resection	4,789 (2.1)	1,068 (2.4)	3,721 (2.1)	< 0.001

Variable	Adjusted HR (95% CI)	P-value
Sex
Male	2.312 (1.622–2.981)	< 0.001
Female	2.160 (1.515–2.784)	< 0.001
Age group (yr)
18–29	2.029 (1.423–2.615)	< 0.001
30–39	2.291 (1.607–2.953)	< 0.001
40–49	2.305 (1.617–2.971)	< 0.001
50–59	2.379 (1.669–3.067)	< 0.001
≥ 60	2.106 (1.477–2.715)	< 0.001
Urbanization level
1 (the highest)	2.295 (1.610–2.959)	< 0.001
2	2.274 (1.595–2.931)	< 0.001
3	2.211 (1.551–2.851)	< 0.001
4	2.165 (1.519–2.791)	< 0.001
Season
Spring	2.132 (1.496–2.748)	< 0.001
Summer	2.191 (1.537–2.825)	< 0.001
Autumn	2.262 (1.587–2.915)	< 0.001
Winter	2.404 (1.686–3.098)	< 0.001
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus	2.528 (1.774–3.259)	< 0.001
Dyslipidemia	2.333 (1.637–3.008)	< 0.001
Obesity	2.406 (1.688–3.101)	< 0.001
Morbid obesity	2.530 (1.786-3.249)	< 0.001
OSA	2.334 (1.638–3.009)	< 0.001
PCOS	2.482 (1.741–3.199)	< 0.001
Hypothyroidism	2.259 (1.585–2.912)	< 0.001
Hypogonadism	3.183 (2.233–4.104)	< 0.001
PD resection	2.716 (1.906–3.502)	< 0.001

Variable	Adjusted HR (95% CI)	P-value
Overall IBD	2.245 (1.575–2.894)	< 0.001
Ulcerative colitis	2.260 (1.584–2.913)	< 0.001
Crohn’s disease	2.231 (1.562–2.876)	< 0.001

Variable	Adjusted HR (95% CI)	P-value
Overall NAFLD	2.245 (1.575–2.894)	< 0.001
Without cirrhosis	2.191 (1.533–2.821)	< 0.001
With cirrhosis	2.349 (1.648–3.027)	< 0.001

Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients Enrolled

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PD resection, post-pancreaticoduodenal resection.

Table 2. Characteristics of Study in the Endpoint

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PD resection, post-pancreaticoduodenal resection.

Table 3. Risk Factors of Inflammatory Bowel Disease between NAFLD and Non-NAFLD Groups Stratified by Variables

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PD resection, post-pancreaticoduodenal resection.

Table 4. Factors of IBD Subgroups Using Cox Regression with versus without (Reference) NAFLD

IBD, Inflammatory bowel disease; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 5. Factors of Inflammatory Bowel Disease among NAFLD with/without Liver Cirrhosis Using Cox Regression

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty live disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.