 |
| CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
| Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
| Fecal microbiota transplant via colonoscopy may be preferred due to intraprocedure findings |
| Janice M. Cho, Laura Pestana, Ryan Pardi, Darrell S. Pardi, Sahil Khanna |
|
Intest Res. 2019;17(3):434-437. Published online May 31, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.00056 |
|
Fecal microbiota transplant via colonoscopy may be preferred due to intraprocedure findings Intestinal Research. 2019;17(3):434-437  Mo1666 Incidental Colonoscopy Findings during Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for C. difficile Infection Gastroenterology. 2016;150(4):S747-S748 Fecal Microbiota Transplant Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences. 2019; Commentary to “Safety, Clinical Response, and Microbiome Findings Following Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2019;25(8):e101-e101 Fecal Microbiota Transplant Hospital Medicine Clinics. 2016;5(1):58-70 Mo1961 – Inpatient Management of Severe Clostridium Infection Using Fecal Microbiota Transplant Via Retention Enema Gastroenterology. 2019;156(6):S-902 Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for RefractoryClostridium difficileColitis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients American Journal of Transplantation. 2014;14(2):477-480 A Misleading Reference for Fecal Microbiota Transplant American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015;110(12):1731 Inpatient Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Severe and Complicated Clostridium difficile Infections Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2016;3(suppl_1): Methodology, Not Concept of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Affects Clinical Findings Gastroenterology. 2016;150(1):285-286 |
