Intestinal Research

Comparative short-term efficacy of upadacitinib versus tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis: a 24-week real-world study in Japan: Akiko Tamura, Hiromichi Shimizu, Toshimitsu Fujii, Ami Kawamoto, Ryo Morikawa, Shuji Hibiya, Kento Takenaka, Masakazu Nagahori, Kazuo Ohtsuka, Ryuichi Okamoto; Received November 14, 2024 Accepted February 10, 2025 Published online March 20, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00187 [Epub ahead of print]

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub: Background/Aims
Tofacitinib and upadacitinib are small-molecule compounds that inhibit the Janus kinase pathway for the treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis. Only a few reports have compared the efficacy and safety of these 2 drugs in real-world practice. We aimed to show our real-world evidence of these drugs and compare the efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.
Methods
This study is a single-center retrospective analysis. Patients treated with tofacitinib or upadacitinib at our hospital between June 2018 and January 2024 who were monitored for 24 weeks were included. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were response and remission rates at each time point, time series changes in partial Mayo scores and laboratory results, treatment survival at 24 weeks, and the incidence of adverse events.
Results
A total of 68 patients treated with tofacitinib and 34 patients treated with upadacitinib were included. Steroid-free clinical remission rate at 24 weeks was significantly higher in upadacitinib-treated patients than in tofacitinibtreated patients (64.7% vs. 38.2%). The response rates in upadacitinib-treated patients exceeded 60% after 8 weeks of treatment through to 24 weeks, and the rates were higher than those in tofacitinib-treated patients. The incidences of adverse events were 79.4% in upadacitinib-treated patients and 38.2% in tofacitinib-treated patients. The most common adverse event was acne for upadacitinib.
Conclusions
Upadacitinib was more effective than tofacitinib in inducing remission in ulcerative colitis patients. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher with upadacitinib than tofacitinib.

774 View
144 Download

Propensity score-matched real-world comparative treatment outcomes of Janus kinase inhibitors for ulcerative colitis in patients with and without prior exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor α antibody: Maiko Ikenouchi, Hirokazu Fukui, Soichi Yagi, Akira Nogami, Koji Kaku, Toshiyuki Sato, Mikio Kawai, Koji Kamikozuru, Yoko Yokoyama, Tetsuya Takagawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Taku Kobayashi, Shinichiro Shinzaki; Received September 22, 2024 Accepted November 20, 2024 Published online February 3, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00148 [Epub ahead of print]

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub: Background/Aims
Tofacitinib (TFB), filgotinib (FIL), and upadacitinib (UPA) are Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The appropriate positioning of each JAK inhibitor in the treatment algorithm, however, is unclear. Furthermore, real-world efficacy of JAK inhibitors for patients with UC and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor α antibody (aTNF) treatment are not fully investigated. We compared the efficacy and safety of 3 JAK inhibitors in patients with UC, considering their prior aTNF exposure.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted in patients with UC who started TFB, FIL, or UPA at 2 academic centers. This propensity score-matched cohort study assessed the effectiveness of the 3 JAK inhibitors for UC in patients with and without prior aTNF exposure, comparing steroid-free clinical remission and response rates after 8 weeks.
Results
Among 274 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 145 experienced aTNF exposure (TFB: 59.2%, 100/169; FIL: 34.5%, 20/58; UPA: 53.2%, 25/47). Based on propensity score-matching, UPA led to a higher steroid-free clinical remission rates than TFB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42–21.90) or FIL (aOR, 9.00; 95% CI, 1.42–57.10) in patients exposed to aTNF. Steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response rates did not differ significantly between each group in patients non-exposed to aTNF. The incidence of adverse events was slightly higher with UPA than TFB or FIL.
Conclusions
UPA may be more effective for UC than TFB or FIL, especially in patients with previous aTNF exposure, although consideration should be given to adverse events.

1,282 View
259 Download

Upadacitinib induction is effective and safe in ulcerative colitis patients including those with prior exposure to tofacitinib: a multicenter real-world cohort study: Robert Gilmore, Richard Fernandes, Imogen Hartley, Arteen Arzivian, Rupert Leong, Bridgette Andrew, Abhinav Vasudevan, Tessa Greeve, Gregory Thomas Moore, Steven Kim, Daniel Lightowler, Abhey Singh, Gillian Mahy, Aditya Mithanthaya, Kannan Venugopaul, Sangwoo Han, Robert Bryant, Jack West, Jonathan Segal, Britt Christensen, Crispin Corte, Nik Ding, Yoon-Kyo An, Jakob Begun; Received August 12, 2024 Accepted October 7, 2024 Published online December 20, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00127 [Epub ahead of print]

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims
Upadacitinib is a novel selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for use in ulcerative colitis. Clinical trials had rigorous criteria and excluded many patient subgroups. Given limited real-world effectiveness data, we examined outcomes of patients treated with upadacitinib for ulcerative colitis in a real-world population.
Methods
Patients that commenced upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis from September 2022 until March 2023 were identified at 13 inflammatory bowel disease centers across Australia. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and intestinal ultrasound outcomes were recorded retrospectively at baseline, week 8, and week 16.
Results
One hundred and fifty-two patients (61 female [40%], median age 38 years [interquartile range, 28–50]) were included. The primary endpoint of clinical remission was met in 79% at week 8, and 84% at week 16. A total of 42 patients (28%) with prior tofacitinib exposure were included. No significant difference in clinical remission was observed by week 16 between tofacitinib experienced compared to tofacitinib naïve patients (86% vs. 84%, P= 0.67). Complete intestinal ultrasound data was available for 36 patients, showing transmural remission in 64% at week 8 and 81% at week 16, with a decrease in median bowel wall thickness of 2.3 mm and 2.4 mm, respectively.
Conclusions
Upadacitinib resulted in high rates of clinical remission at 8 and 16 weeks in this large real-world cohort of ulcerative colitis patients. Upadacitinib is effective in patients with prior tofacitinib exposure. Intestinal ultrasound shows significant rates of transmural remission at week 8, sustained through week 16.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Letter: Toward Intra‐Class Switching With JAK Inhibitors?
Mathieu Uzzan, David Laharie
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2025; 61(5): 919. CrossRef

1,641 View
226 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Search