Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
11 "Janus kinase"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Impact of filgotinib on health-related quality of life over 3 years in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: a post hoc analysis of the SELECTION and SELECTION long-term extension trials
Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Stefan Schreiber, Erina Hata, Toshihiko Kaise, Toshifumi Hibi
Received September 9, 2025  Accepted December 7, 2025  Published online March 4, 2026  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00219    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background/Aims
This post hoc analysis of the phase 2b/3 SELECTION (NCT02914522) study and its long-term extension (SELECTIONLTE; NCT02914535) evaluated the impact of filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis over 3 years.
Methods
Patients in SELECTION were randomized to FIL200, filgotinib 100 mg, or placebo (PBO) during the induction phase. Week-10 responders were re-randomized to continue assigned treatment or PBO in the 47-week maintenance phase. Patients who completed the SELECTION induction and maintenance phases (completers) and week-10 non-responders could enter SELECTIONLTE. HRQoL and work productivity were assessed using EQ 5-dimension (EQ-5D), EQ visual analog scale, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaires at week 10 (FIL200 vs. PBO), and at week 10 and years 1–3 (completers and non-responders who received only FIL200 in SELECTION+SELECTIONLTE).
Results
Proportions of patients with minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) at week 10 were higher with FIL200 versus PBO for IBDQ total score (77% vs. 54%), SF-36 mental component summary (58% vs. 21%), and SF-36 physical component summary (54% vs. 36%). All measures (except WPAI absenteeism) showed mean score changes from baseline at week 10 in the direction of improved HRQoL with FIL200 versus PBO. MCID rates were maintained in completers up to 3 years and increased notably in non-responders (except WPAI absenteeism and EQ-5D) from week 10 to years 1–3.
Conclusions
FIL200 treatment was associated with sustained improvements in HRQoL and work productivity over 3 years in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis, consistent with the overall SELECTION and SELECTIONLTE trial populations.
  • 279 View
  • 29 Download
Close layer
Reviews
IBD
Optimal use and cycling strategies of Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: current evidence and clinical implications from the KASID Guidelines Task Force Team
Seung Min Hong, Dong Hyun Kim, June Hwa Bae, Seung Yong Shin, Eun Mi Song, Ji Eun Kim, Young Joo Yang, Jiyoung Yoon, Sang-Bum Kang, Eun Soo Kim, Seong-Eun Kim, Seong-Jung Kim, Jun Lee, Soo-Young Na, Soo Jung Park, Sang Hyoung Park, Miyoung Choi, Myung Ha Kim, Won Moon, Sung-Ae Jung, KASID Guidelines Taskforce Team of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)
Intest Res 2026;24(1):27-37.   Published online January 28, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00309
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are an important treatment option for ulcerative colitis, providing rapid onset of action, oral administration, and efficacy even after biologic failure. The 3 approved agents—tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib—differ in JAK isoform selectivity, leading to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety. Evidence from network meta-analyses, clinical trials, and real-world studies consistently shows that upadacitinib provides the highest efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission, whereas filgotinib demonstrates the most favorable safety profile. The strong efficacy of upadacitinib and tofacitinib is particularly relevant in patients with severe disease, including acute severe ulcerative colitis, and upadacitinib maintains high efficacy regardless of prior advanced therapy exposure. JAK inhibitors also benefit extraintestinal manifestations. Although risks such as herpes zoster, serious infection, thromboembolism, and major cardiovascular events differ among agents, long-term data suggest generally acceptable safety when used appropriately. Intraclass JAK-to-JAK cycling is feasible, with about half of patients achieving steroid-free clinical remission in retrospective cohorts. Based on mechanistic, clinical, and real-world evidence, filgotinib may be a first-line option for patients with lower disease activity or when safety is a priority, whereas upadacitinib or tofacitinib may be preferred in higher disease activity. Strategically selecting agents may improve durability and outcomes.
  • 1,222 View
  • 68 Download
Close layer
The JAK attack: transforming the management of ulcerative colitis in India
Arshdeep Singh, Arshia Bhardwaj, Vandana Midha, Ajit Sood
Received July 26, 2025  Accepted September 8, 2025  Published online January 2, 2026  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00153    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Inflammatory bowel disease is increasingly recognized as a significant clinical entity in India, reflecting the country’s ongoing epidemiological transition. With a rising incidence and an expanding disease spectrum, the limitations of conventional therapeutic agents, such as corticosteroids and thiopurines, have become increasingly evident. This review examines the transformative role of Janus kinase inhibitors, particularly tofacitinib, in redefining therapeutic goals and bridging the gap between medical innovation and real-world implementation in resource-limited settings. Tofacitinib represents a pivotal advancement in the therapeutic landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) in India, offering the advantages of oral administration, rapid onset of action, predictable pharmacokinetics, and cost-effective generic formulations–thereby overcoming several longstanding barriers to the adoption of advanced therapies. Accumulating real-world evidence from India supports its clinical utility across various phenotypes of UC, including corticosteroid-dependent or refractory disease, acute severe UC, ulcerative proctitis, elderly-onset UC, and in achieving deeper remission endpoints such as histologic healing. Furthermore, its incorporation into routine clinical practice has contributed to a measurable reduction in corticosteroid reliance, thereby aligning treatment strategies with international standards of care. By combining efficacy, safety, accessibility, and ease of use, tofacitinib has catalyzed a paradigm shift in the management of UC in the Indian context.
  • 1,127 View
  • 141 Download
Close layer
Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in the treatment of ulcerative colitis with a focus on rapid and sustained efficacy: a narrative review
Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Toshihiko Kaise, Chisa Nagakura, Makoto Kamiya, Shu-Chen Wei
Received July 25, 2025  Accepted September 28, 2025  Published online November 19, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00155    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
The rising incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) globally highlights the necessity for treatment strategies that extend beyond symptom control to include inducing and maintaining remission, achieving biochemical and endoscopic remission, and restoring quality of life. Janus kinase inhibitors, such as filgotinib (FIL), show promise in treating UC. This review consolidates evidence on FIL in treating UC from the SELECTION and SELECTIONLTE trials, and real-world studies. Overall, FIL demonstrated rapid symptom relief (e.g., improved rectal bleeding and stool frequency) within 7 days and durable efficacy (e.g., clinical remission, Mayo Clinic Score response) up to 4 years. Improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and reduced corticosteroid dependency were also observed. The 200 mg dose generally elicited greater efficacy responses than the 100 mg dose, and hence may potentially be a more suitable choice for optimizing treatment outcomes. Although FIL may be an effective long-term treatment option regardless of prior biologic experience, biologic-naive patients may experience greater sustained clinical improvements. Safety outcomes indicated that FIL was well tolerated with no unexpected safety signals in SELECTION and SELECTIONLTE. These findings support FIL’s potential as a robust therapeutic option for UC, due to its acceptable safety profile and benefits across clinical and HRQoL outcomes.
  • 1,240 View
  • 194 Download
Close layer
Optimizing Janus kinase inhibitor therapy for ulcerative colitis: a real-world perspective
Shintaro Akiyama
Received June 1, 2025  Accepted June 19, 2025  Published online November 14, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00096    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
In real-world clinical practice, 3 Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors—tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib—are now available for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Emerging real-world evidence highlights distinct efficacy and safety profiles among these agents, largely attributed to differences in JAK selectivity and dosing strategies. Notably, data are accumulating on differential efficacy, predictors of therapeutic response, and outcomes in patients who switch between JAK inhibitors, contributing to a clearer understanding of the optimal positioning of each agent. Regarding safety, particular attention has been given to risks such as herpes zoster infection and drug-induced acne, underscoring the importance of appropriate patient education and individualized risk assessment. This review summarizes clinical trials and current real-world data on tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib in ulcerative colitis, and discusses strategies for optimizing their clinical application.
  • 1,468 View
  • 236 Download
Close layer
Original Articles
Ulcerative colitis disease severity affects the speed of symptom relief under filgotinib treatment: a post hoc analysis of the phase 2b/3 SELECTION study
Masayuki Saruta, Silvio Danese, Yoshie Takatori, Toshihiko Kaise, Christine Rudolph, Marc Ferrante, Toshifumi Hibi
Received October 23, 2024  Accepted April 28, 2025  Published online June 30, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00169    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Filgotinib is an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to assess symptomatic response with filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) according to disease severity using baseline partial Mayo Clinic Score (pMCS).
Methods
In the phase 2b/3 SELECTION study (NCT02914522), adults with moderate-to-severe UC were randomized to receive FIL200, filgotinib 100 mg, or placebo for 11 weeks in induction studies A (biologic-naive) and B (biologic-experienced). In this post hoc analysis, symptomatic remission (Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 and stool frequency subscore ≤ 1) rates were assessed daily from baseline to day 15 and fortnightly from week 2 to week 10 by baseline pMCS (pMCS ≥ 7, pMCS < 7) in patients who received induction FIL200.
Results
Of those who received FIL200 in induction studies A and B, 90 and 148 patients had a pMCS ≥ 7, and 155 and 114 had a pMCS < 7, respectively. Symptomatic remission rates were generally significantly higher in the pMCS < 7 than ≥ 7 group from day 2–15 (day 2: 8.4% vs. 1.1%, P= 0.009 [induction study A]; 8.8% vs. 0.7%, P= 0.004 [induction study B]). However, by week 10, there was no longer a significant difference in the rates between the pMCS ≥ 7 and < 7 groups (43.3% vs. 54.8%, P= 0.124 [induction study A]; 26.4% vs. 39.5%, P= 0.099 [induction study B]).
Conclusions
Symptomatic response to FIL200 occurred more rapidly in the less severe disease groups than in the more severe disease groups; however, regardless of disease severity, both groups benefited from continued FIL200 treatment.
  • 3,564 View
  • 376 Download
Close layer
IBD
Propensity score-matched real-world comparative treatment outcomes of Janus kinase inhibitors for ulcerative colitis in patients with and without prior exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor α antibody
Maiko Ikenouchi, Hirokazu Fukui, Soichi Yagi, Akira Nogami, Koji Kaku, Toshiyuki Sato, Mikio Kawai, Koji Kamikozuru, Yoko Yokoyama, Tetsuya Takagawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Taku Kobayashi, Shinichiro Shinzaki
Intest Res 2025;23(4):464-474.   Published online February 3, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00148
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Tofacitinib (TFB), filgotinib (FIL), and upadacitinib (UPA) are Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The appropriate positioning of each JAK inhibitor in the treatment algorithm, however, is unclear. Furthermore, real-world efficacy of JAK inhibitors for patients with UC and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor α antibody (aTNF) treatment are not fully investigated. We compared the efficacy and safety of 3 JAK inhibitors in patients with UC, considering their prior aTNF exposure.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted in patients with UC who started TFB, FIL, or UPA at 2 academic centers. This propensity score-matched cohort study assessed the effectiveness of the 3 JAK inhibitors for UC in patients with and without prior aTNF exposure, comparing steroid-free clinical remission and response rates after 8 weeks.
Results
Among 274 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 145 experienced aTNF exposure (TFB: 59.2%, 100/169; FIL: 34.5%, 20/58; UPA: 53.2%, 25/47). Based on propensity score-matching, UPA led to a higher steroid-free clinical remission rates than TFB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42–21.90) or FIL (aOR, 9.00; 95% CI, 1.42–57.10) in patients exposed to aTNF. Steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response rates did not differ significantly between each group in patients non-exposed to aTNF. The incidence of adverse events was slightly higher with UPA than TFB or FIL.
Conclusions
UPA may be more effective for UC than TFB or FIL, especially in patients with previous aTNF exposure, although consideration should be given to adverse events.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-term clinical outcomes with filgotinib in ulcerative colitis: 12-month results from the FILGUITO study
    Antonio M Caballero-Mateos, Claudio Trigo-Salado, Álvaro Suárez-Toribio, María del Mar Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco J Rodríguez-González, Teresa Valdés-Delgado, Héctor Pallarés-Manrique, Ana María Trapero-Martínez, Raúl Olmedo-Martín, Cristina Bailón-Gaona
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal use and cycling strategies of Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: current evidence and clinical implications from the KASID Guidelines Task Force Team
    Seung Min Hong, Dong Hyun Kim, June Hwa Bae, Seung Yong Shin, Eun Mi Song, Ji Eun Kim, Young Joo Yang, Jiyoung Yoon, Sang-Bum Kang, Eun Soo Kim, Seong-Eun Kim, Seong-Jung Kim, Jun Lee, Soo-Young Na, Soo Jung Park, Sang Hyoung Park, Miyoung Choi, Myung Ha
    Intestinal Research.2026; 24(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • The Evolving Landscape of Advanced Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Emerging Targets
    Daniele Balducci, Marta Mosca, Sabrina Monaco, Susanna Faenza, Stefano Fabiani, Fabio Cortellini, Nicola Cesaro, Gianpiero Stefanelli, Salvatore Paba, Maddalena Pecchini, Michele Montori, Marco Valvano
    Gastrointestinal Disorders.2026; 8(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Comparative effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and filgotinib in patients with ulcerative colitis: A propensity score-weighted cohort study
    Fabio Salvatore Macaluso, Walter Fries, Anna Viola, Clara De Francesco, Nunzio Belluardo, Emiliano Giangreco, Maria Cappello, Roberto Ajovalasit, Filippo Mocciaro, Barbara Scrivo, Antonino Carlo Privitera, Maria Emanuela Distefano, Alessandro Vitello, Con
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2025; 57(11): 2109.     CrossRef
  • Three Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: is upadacitinib taking the lead?
    Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(4): 394.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Janus kinase inhibitor therapy for ulcerative colitis: a real-world perspective
    Shintaro Akiyama
    Intestinal Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Concise Questions and Answers on Their Use in Clinical Practice
    Javier P Gisbert, María Chaparro
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Upadacitinib versus Tofacitinib in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tareq Alsaleh, Abdul Mohammed, Aimen Farooq, Magda Elamin, Amr Akl, Karim Mohamed Yassin, Ahmed Elnaggar, Jennifer Seminerio
    Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases.2025; 11(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • 8,388 View
  • 580 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
IBD
Upadacitinib induction is effective and safe in ulcerative colitis patients including those with prior exposure to tofacitinib: a multicenter real-world cohort study
Robert Gilmore, Richard Fernandes, Imogen Hartley, Arteen Arzivian, Rupert Leong, Bridgette Andrew, Abhinav Vasudevan, Tessa Greeve, Gregory Thomas Moore, Steven Kim, Daniel Lightowler, Abhey Singh, Gillian Mahy, Aditya Mithanthaya, Kannan Venugopaul, Sangwoo Han, Robert Bryant, Jack West, Jonathan Segal, Britt Christensen, Crispin Corte, Nik Ding, Yoon-Kyo An, Jakob Begun
Intest Res 2025;23(3):347-357.   Published online December 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00127
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Upadacitinib is a novel selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for use in ulcerative colitis. Clinical trials had rigorous criteria and excluded many patient subgroups. Given limited real-world effectiveness data, we examined outcomes of patients treated with upadacitinib for ulcerative colitis in a real-world population.
Methods
Patients that commenced upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis from September 2022 until March 2023 were identified at 13 inflammatory bowel disease centers across Australia. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and intestinal ultrasound outcomes were recorded retrospectively at baseline, week 8, and week 16.
Results
One hundred and fifty-two patients (61 female [40%], median age 38 years [interquartile range, 28–50]) were included. The primary endpoint of clinical remission was met in 79% at week 8, and 84% at week 16. A total of 42 patients (28%) with prior tofacitinib exposure were included. No significant difference in clinical remission was observed by week 16 between tofacitinib experienced compared to tofacitinib naïve patients (86% vs. 84%, P= 0.67). Complete intestinal ultrasound data was available for 36 patients, showing transmural remission in 64% at week 8 and 81% at week 16, with a decrease in median bowel wall thickness of 2.3 mm and 2.4 mm, respectively.
Conclusions
Upadacitinib resulted in high rates of clinical remission at 8 and 16 weeks in this large real-world cohort of ulcerative colitis patients. Upadacitinib is effective in patients with prior tofacitinib exposure. Intestinal ultrasound shows significant rates of transmural remission at week 8, sustained through week 16.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Letter: Toward Intra‐Class Switching With JAK Inhibitors?
    Mathieu Uzzan, David Laharie
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2025; 61(5): 919.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Safety of a Second JAK Inhibitor in Ulcerative Colitis: The J2J Multicentre Study
    Mathilde Osty, Romain Altwegg, Mélanie Serrero, Alban Benezech, Albane Lecomte, Guillaume Cadiot, Lucine Vuitton, Anne Wampach, Stéphane Nancey, Anthony Buisson, Catherine le Berre, Clea Rouillon, Cyrielle Gilletta, Felix Goutorbe, Mathurin Fumery, Nassim
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2025; 62(4): 430.     CrossRef
  • Upadacitinib and vedolizumab combination therapy for the management of refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease
    Robert Gilmore, Amrutha Murali, Amirah Etchegaray, Ei Swe, Yoon-Kyo An, Jakob Begun
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(4): 475.     CrossRef
  • Upadacitinib after tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis
    Hyeon Jin Cho, Eun Soo Kim
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(3): 229.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab and Upadacitinib in Biologically Experienced Ulcerative Colitis Patients
    Osman Özdoğan, Serkan Yaraş, Mehmet Kasım Aydın, Fehmi Ateş, Engin Altıntaş, Orhan Sezgin
    Biomedicines.2025; 13(10): 2455.     CrossRef
  • Is 2nd JAKi treatment for UC worth the effort? A retrospective, multi-centre UK study
    Chandni Radia, Yaa Danso, Susan Ritchie, Melissa Hale, Alexander T Elford, Chirag Patel, Lucy Hicks, Sonia Kalyanji, Chaonan Dong, Katie Yeung, Jie Han Yeo, Mohammed Allah-Ditta, Maria Bishara, Karishma Sethi-Arora, Lushen Pillay, Emma L Johnston, Ruth Ru
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • IBD 2024: Charting a New Course in IBD Proceedings of the Takeda Symposium 22–23 November 2024 W Hotel, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Uma Mahadevan, Vipul Jairath, Jakob Begun, Aviv Pudipeddi, Mayur Garg, Peter De Cruz, Christopher F. D. Li Wai Suen, Matthew C. Choy, Danny Con, Rose Vaughan, John D. Chetwood, David A. Clark, Craig Haifer, Miles P. Sparrow, Rupert Leong, Réme Mountifield
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 40(S3): 3.     CrossRef
  • Three Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: is upadacitinib taking the lead?
    Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(4): 394.     CrossRef
  • Upadacitinib’s Effectiveness and Safety as a Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Data from a Real-World Study
    Giammarco Mocci, Antonio Tursi, Franco Scaldaferri, Daniele Napolitano, Daniela Pugliese, Giovanni Maconi, Giovanni Cataletti, Roberta Pica, Claudio Cassieri, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Caterina De Barba, Francesco Costa, Linda Ceccarelli, Manuela Marzo,
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(21): 7801.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Janus kinase inhibitor therapy for ulcerative colitis: a real-world perspective
    Shintaro Akiyama
    Intestinal Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Concise Questions and Answers on Their Use in Clinical Practice
    Javier P Gisbert, María Chaparro
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,510 View
  • 421 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Review
IBD
What to do when traditional rescue therapies fail in acute severe ulcerative colitis
Christopher F. D. Li Wai Suen, Matthew C. Choy, Peter De Cruz
Intest Res 2024;22(4):397-413.   Published online May 16, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00003
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency that affects approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis at some point in time in their lives. Outcomes of ASUC are highly variable. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to corticosteroids and up to 50% of patients do not respond to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) and require emergency colectomy. Data are emerging on infliximab dosing strategies, use of cyclosporin as a bridge to slower acting biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibition as primary and sequential therapy. In this review, we outline contemporary approaches to clinical management of ASUC in the setting of failure to respond to traditional rescue therapies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Early Infliximab Levels and Clearance Predict Outcomes After Infliximab Rescue in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results From PREDICT-UC
    Christopher F.D. Li Wai Suen, Matthew C. Choy, Danny Con, Kaylene Cheng, Julie Nigro, Kerry Breheney, Kristy Boyd, Raquel Pena, Kathryn Burrell, Ourania Rosella, David Proud, Richard Brouwer, Alexandra Gorelik, Danny Liew, William R. Connell, Emily K. Wri
    Gastroenterology.2026; 170(1): 118.     CrossRef
  • Optimal use and cycling strategies of Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: current evidence and clinical implications from the KASID Guidelines Task Force Team
    Seung Min Hong, Dong Hyun Kim, June Hwa Bae, Seung Yong Shin, Eun Mi Song, Ji Eun Kim, Young Joo Yang, Jiyoung Yoon, Sang-Bum Kang, Eun Soo Kim, Seong-Eun Kim, Seong-Jung Kim, Jun Lee, Soo-Young Na, Soo Jung Park, Sang Hyoung Park, Miyoung Choi, Myung Ha
    Intestinal Research.2026; 24(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Monocyte Distribution Width Differentiates Bacterial Enterocolitis from Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Emergency Department
    Christopher F. D. Li Wai Suen, Shipraa Kaul, Ethan X. Z. Tan, Danny Con, Michelle Taylor, Joanne Wiid, Chris Hogan, Matthew C. Choy, Kumar Visvanathan, Peter De Cruz
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intensified infliximab induction therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis – Authors’ reply
    Christopher F D Li Wai Suen, Matthew C Choy, Danny Con, Peter De Cruz
    The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2025; 10(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Janus kinase inhibitors in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis: a comprehensive review
    Javier P Gisbert, María Chaparro
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sequential rescue therapy with JAK inhibitors in corticosteroid and infliximab-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: a case series
    Amirah Etchegaray, George Tambakis, Rina Kumar, Anthony Croft, Graham Radford-Smith, Gareth J. Walker
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Population Pharmacokinetic Model for the Use of Intravenous or Subcutaneous Infliximab in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-World Data from a Prospective Cohort Study
    Joo Hye Song, Sung Noh Hong, Myeong Gyu Kim, Minjung Kim, Seong Kyung Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim
    Gut and Liver.2025; 19(3): 376.     CrossRef
  • Three Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: is upadacitinib taking the lead?
    Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(4): 394.     CrossRef
  • Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Concise Questions and Answers on Their Use in Clinical Practice
    Javier P Gisbert, María Chaparro
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
    Elaine Ong Ming San, Kassem Sharif, Konstantina Rosiou, Michael Rennie, Christian Philipp Selinger
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(23): 7446.     CrossRef
  • 11,610 View
  • 387 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
IBD
Efficacy and safety of filgotinib as induction and maintenance therapy for Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a post-hoc analysis of the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial
Toshifumi Hibi, Satoshi Motoya, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Fumihito Hirai, Kenji Watanabe, Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Masayuki Saruta, Taku Kobayashi, Brian G Feagan, Chantal Tasset, Robin Besuyen, Chohee Yun, Gerald Crans, Jie Zhang, Akira Kondo, Mamoru Watanabe
Intest Res 2023;21(1):110-125.   Published online March 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2021.00143
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
The safety and efficacy of filgotinib, a once-daily oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, were evaluated in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial.
Methods
SELECTION (NCT02914522) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial comprising 2 induction studies and a maintenance study. Adults with moderately to severely active UC were randomized in induction study A (biologic-naïve) or B (biologic-experienced) to receive filgotinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo once daily for 11 weeks. Patients in clinical remission or Mayo Clinic score response at week 10 entered the 47-week maintenance study. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in Japanese patients enrolled in Japan.
Results
Overall, 37 and 72 Japanese patients were enrolled in Japan in induction studies A and B, respectively, and 54 entered the maintenance study. Numerically higher proportions of filgotinib 200 mg-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved clinical remission in induction study A (4/15 [26.7%] vs. 0/6 [0%]) and the maintenance study (5/20 [25.0%] vs. 0/9 [0%]), but not induction study B (1/29 [3.4%] vs. 1/14 [7.1%]). Both doses were well tolerated, and no new safety signals were noted. Herpes zoster was reported in 1 filgotinib 200 mg-treated patient in each of induction study A (2.3%, 1/44) and the maintenance study (5.0%, 1/20).
Conclusions
These data, alongside those of the overall SELECTION population, suggest the potential of filgotinib 200 mg as a viable treatment option for Japanese patients with UC. Owing to small patient numbers, data should be interpreted cautiously.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Quercus infectoria galls mitigates colitis in mice through alleviating mucosal barrier impairment and suppressing inflammatory factors
    Yan Ding, Jiao-Jiao Bai, Sabahat Ablimit, Muyassar Yasen, Arfidin Anwar, Kudelaidi Kuerban, Mubarak Iminjan, Guo-Qiang Zhang
    Journal of Ethnopharmacology.2025; 343: 119487.     CrossRef
  • Post-marketing surveillance of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: a final report of safety and effectiveness data
    Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Satoshi Motoya, Takayuki Yamamoto, Minoru Matsuura, Toshimitsu Fujii, Shinichiro Shinzaki, Yohei Mikami, Shoko Arai, Junichi Oshima, Yutaka Endo, Hirotoshi Yuasa, Masato Hoshi, Keiko Sato, Tadakazu Hisamatsu
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 60(8): 979.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of filgotinib for ulcerative colitis: A real‐world multicenter retrospective study in Japan
    Shintaro Akiyama, Kaoru Yokoyama, Soichi Yagi, Shinichiro Shinzaki, Kozo Tsuruta, Shinichiro Yoshioka, Minako Sako, Hiromichi Shimizu, Mariko Kobayashi, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Kei Nomura, Tomoyoshi Shibuya, Masahiro Takahara, Sakiko Hiraoka, Kyohei Sugai, Shu
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2024; 59(11): 1413.     CrossRef
  • Real-World Data on the Effectiveness and Safety of Filgotinib for Ulcerative Colitis in Japanese Patients: A Single-Center Experience
    Takahito Toba, Ryo Karashima, Kodai Fujii, Keiichi Inoue, Nanako Inoue, Yurie Ogawa, Aya Hojo, Ai Fujimoto, Takahisa Matsuda
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean adult patients with ulcerative colitis: post-marketing surveillance study
    Hyuk Yoon, Byong Duk Ye, Sang-Bum Kang, Kang-Moon Lee, Chang Hwan Choi, Joo-young Jo, Juwon Woo, Jae Hee Cheon
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patients’ Preference on Advanced Therapy and Follow-Up Procedure for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Japan: A Web-Based 3A Survey
    Toshifumi Morishita, Shunichi Yanai, Yosuke Toya, Takayuki Matsumoto
    Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases.2024; 9(1): 174.     CrossRef
  • The role and prospect of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis
    Jun Lee
    Intestinal Research.2023; 21(1): 168.     CrossRef
  • Advances in pharmacotherapy for ulcerative colitis: a focus on JAK1 inhibitors
    Alexander Goetsch, Ferdinando D’Amico, Mariangela Allocca, Gionata Fiorino, Federica Furfaro, Alessandra Zilli, Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi, Simona Radice, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.2023; 24(7): 849.     CrossRef
  • Understanding the efficacy of individual Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of ulcerative colitis for future positioning in inflammatory bowel disease treatment
    Hiroshi Nakase
    Immunological Medicine.2023; 46(3): 121.     CrossRef
  • Inflammation-Driven Colorectal Cancer Associated with Colitis: From Pathogenesis to Changing Therapy
    Olga Maria Nardone, Irene Zammarchi, Giovanni Santacroce, Subrata Ghosh, Marietta Iacucci
    Cancers.2023; 15(8): 2389.     CrossRef
  • Extraintestinal Cancers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Literature Review
    Alessandro Massano, Luisa Bertin, Fabiana Zingone, Andrea Buda, Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Lorenzo Bertani, Nicola de Bortoli, Matteo Fassan, Marco Scarpa, Cesare Ruffolo, Imerio Angriman, Cristina Bezzio, Valentina Casini, Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, Edoardo
    Cancers.2023; 15(15): 3824.     CrossRef
  • Integrated safety analysis of filgotinib for ulcerative colitis: Results from SELECTION and SELECTIONLTE
    Stefan Schreiber, Gerhard Rogler, Mamoru Watanabe, Séverine Vermeire, Christian Maaser, Silvio Danese, Margaux Faes, Paul Van Hoek, Jeremy Hsieh, Ulrik Moerch, Yan Zhou, Angela de Haas, Christine Rudolph, Alessandra Oortwijn, Edward V. Loftus
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2023; 58(9): 874.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in anti-inflammatory active components and action mechanisms of natural medicines
    Zhimin Wu, Tao Zhang, Xiaofei Ma, Shuai Guo, Qingqing Zhou, Arshad Zahoor, Ganzhen Deng
    Inflammopharmacology.2023; 31(6): 2901.     CrossRef
  • Filgotinib for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
    Alessandro Mannucci, Ferdinando D’Amico, Ahmad El Saadi, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 16(10): 927.     CrossRef
  • 12,429 View
  • 820 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
IBD
Tofacitinib induction and maintenance therapy in East Asian patients with active ulcerative colitis: subgroup analyses from three phase 3 multinational studies
Satoshi Motoya, Mamoru Watanabe, Hyo Jong Kim, Young Ho Kim, Dong Soo Han, Hirotoshi Yuasa, Junichi Tabira, Naoki Isogawa, Shoko Arai, Isao Kawaguchi, Toshifumi Hibi
Intest Res 2018;16(2):233-245.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.233
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor being investigated for ulcerative colitis (UC). In OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, patients with moderately to severely active UC received placebo or tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) for 8 weeks. Clinical responders in OCTAVE Induction were re-randomized to 52 weeks' therapy with placebo, tofacitinib 5 mg BID, or tofacitinib 10 mg BID.

Methods

We conducted post-hoc efficacy and safety analyses of East Asian patients in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 and OCTAVE Sustain.

Results

A total of 121 East Asian (Japan, Korea, and Taiwan) patients were randomized in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 (placebo, n=26; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=95), and 63 in OCTAVE Sustain (placebo, n=20; tofacitinib 5 mg BID, n=22; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=21). At week 8 of OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, 18.9% of patients (18/95) achieved remission with tofacitinib 10 mg BID versus 3.8% (1/26) with placebo. In OCTAVE Sustain, the week 52 remission rates were 45.5% (10/22), 47.6% (10/21), and 15.0% (3/20) with 5 mg BID, 10 mg BID, and placebo, respectively. Adverse event rates were similar between groups in OCTAVE Induction and numerically higher with tofacitinib in OCTAVE Sustain. Serious adverse event rates were similar across groups in all studies. Infections were numerically more frequent with tofacitinib than placebo. Increases in serum lipid levels were observed with tofacitinib.

Conclusions

In East Asian patients with UC, tofacitinib demonstrated numerically greater efficacy versus placebo as induction and maintenance therapy, with a safety profile consistent with the global study population. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01465763; NCT01458951; NCT01458574.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Post-marketing surveillance of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: a final report of safety and effectiveness data
    Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Satoshi Motoya, Takayuki Yamamoto, Minoru Matsuura, Toshimitsu Fujii, Shinichiro Shinzaki, Yohei Mikami, Shoko Arai, Junichi Oshima, Yutaka Endo, Hirotoshi Yuasa, Masato Hoshi, Keiko Sato, Tadakazu Hisamatsu
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 60(8): 979.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Cases of Withdrawal and Resumption of Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Multicenter Cohort Study
    Yasuki Sano, Yuka Ito, Naoto Yagi, Yusuke Honzawa, Norimasa Fukata, Makoto Naganuma
    Crohn's & Colitis 360.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis: a KASID multicenter cohort study
    Seung Hwan Shin, Kyunghwan Oh, Sung Noh Hong, Jungbok Lee, Shin Ju Oh, Eun Soo Kim, Soo-Young Na, Sang-Bum Kang, Seong-Joon Koh, Ki Bae Bang, Sung-Ae Jung, Sung Hoon Jung, Kyeong Ok Kim, Sang Hyoung Park, Suk-Kyun Yang, Chang Hwan Choi, Byong Duk Ye
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors predicting clinical and endoscopic remission with placebo therapy in East Asian patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jian Zeng, Zhong Wang, Xiao-Jun Yang
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2022; 78(7): 1069.     CrossRef
  • Personalized medicine in inflammatory bowel disease: Perspectives on Asia
    Su Hyun Park, Sang Hyoung Park
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(8): 1434.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of long‐term tofacitinib treatment in East Asian patients with ulcerative colitis in OCTAVE Open
    Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Hyo Jong Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Shoko Arai, Masato Hoshi, Hirotoshi Yuasa, Junichi Tabira, Shigeyuki Toyoizumi, Nanzhi Shi, Joon‐suk Woo, Toshifumi Hibi
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(10): 1884.     CrossRef
  • Management of inflammatory bowel disease beyond tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: novel biologics and small-molecule drugs
    Soo-Young Na, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2022; 37(5): 906.     CrossRef
  • Tofacitinib, the First Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor Approved for Adult Ulcerative Colitis
    Brittany N. Palasik, Hongmei Wang
    Journal of Pharmacy Practice.2021; 34(6): 913.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, burden of disease, and unmet needs in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in Asia
    Shu-Chen Wei, Jose Sollano, Yee Tak Hui, Wei Yu, Paul V. Santos Estrella, Lyndon John Q. Llamado, Nana Koram
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2021; 15(3): 275.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of biologic therapies for biologic-naïve Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a network meta-analysis
    Toshifumi Hibi, Isao Kamae, Philippe Pinton, Lyann Ursos, Ryuichi Iwakiri, Greg Hather, Haridarshan Patel
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in East Asian patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a subpopulation analysis of global phase 3 induction and maintenance studies (UNIFI)
    Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Hyo Jong Kim, Satoshi Motoya, Yasuo Suzuki, Yoshifumi Ohnishi, Noriyuki Fujii, Nobuko Matsushima, Richuan Zheng, Colleen W. Marano
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(4): 386.     CrossRef
  • Post-inflammatory Abdominal Pain in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease During Remission: A Comprehensive Review
    Kazuya Takahashi, Iman Geelani Khwaja, Jocelyn Rachel Schreyer, David Bulmer, Madusha Peiris, Shuji Terai, Qasim Aziz
    Crohn's & Colitis 360.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multiple esophageal ulcers due to tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for ulcerative colitis
    Keiichi Tominaga, Mimari Kanazawa, Kazuhiro Takenaka, Takanao Tanaka, Takeshi Sugaya, Koh Fukushi, Yuka Takagi, Kazunori Nagashima, Keiichiro Abe, Naoya Izawa, Kohei Tsuchida, Makoto Iijima, Kenichi Goda, Hidetsugu Yamagishi, Atsushi Irisawa
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 13(3): 340.     CrossRef
  • Interleukin 23 and autoimmune diseases: current and possible future therapies
    Ahmad Ismail Khaled Abdo, Gee Jun Tye
    Inflammation Research.2020; 69(5): 463.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Lung Abscess Caused by Double Immunosuppressive Therapy to Treat Ulcerative Colitis
    Keiichi Tominaga, Mimari Kanazawa, Takanao Tanaka, Shunsuke Kojimahara, Takeshi Sugaya, Shoko Watanabe, Akira Yamamiya, Yuichi Majima, Makoto Iijima, Kenichi Goda, Atsushi Irisawa
    Medicina.2020; 56(11): 595.     CrossRef
  • Inhibidores de la vía de señalización JAK-STAT en el tratamiento de las enfermedades inmunomediadas
    José M. Serra López-Matencio, Alberto Morell Baladrón, Santos Castañeda
    Medicina Clínica.2019; 152(9): 353.     CrossRef
  • Interleukin-13: A promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disease
    Yan-Mei Mao, Chan-Na Zhao, Jing Leng, Rui-Xue Leng, Dong-Qing Ye, Song Guo Zheng, Hai-Feng Pan
    Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews.2019; 45: 9.     CrossRef
  • JAK-STAT inhibitors for the treatment of immunomediated diseases
    José M. Serra López-Matencio, Alberto Morell Baladrón, Santos Castañeda
    Medicina Clínica (English Edition).2019; 152(9): 353.     CrossRef
  • Tofacitinib in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: efficacy and safety from clinical trials to real-world experience
    Ferdinando D’Amico, Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi, Gionata Fiorino, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inhibitors of the Janus Kinases
    Elisabetta Antonelli, Gabriele Torti, Gabrio Bassotti
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2019; 53(9): 635.     CrossRef
  • Novel oral-targeted therapies for mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
    Elisabetta Antonelli, Vincenzo Villanacci, Gabrio Bassotti
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(47): 5322.     CrossRef
  • 11,331 View
  • 216 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP