Intestinal Research

Review

Colorectal neoplasia

Screening and surveillance for hereditary colorectal cancer: Hee Man Kim, Tae Il Kim; Intest Res 2024;22(2):119-130. Published online February 6, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00112

Hereditary colorectal cancer is a type of cancer that is caused by a genetic mutation. Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer, or who have a known hereditary syndrome, are at an increased risk of developing the disease. Screening and surveillance are important tools for managing the risk of hereditary colorectal cancer. Screening involves a combination of tests that can detect precancerous or cancerous changes in the colon and rectum. Surveillance involves regular follow-up examinations to monitor disease progression and to identify new developments. The frequency and type of screening and surveillance tests may vary depending on an individual’s risk factors, genetic profile, and medical history. However, early detection and treatment of hereditary colorectal cancer can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality rates. By implementing comprehensive screening and surveillance strategies, healthcare providers can help individuals at risk of hereditary colorectal cancer to receive timely interventions and make informed decisions about their health. Specific examples of screening and surveillance tests for hereditary colorectal cancer include colonoscopy, genetic testing, and imaging tests. In this review article, we will discuss detailed screening and surveillance of hereditary colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial
Yunho Jung, Hyun Gun Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Hyoun Woo Kang, Jae Jun Park, Dong Hoon Baek, Jaeyoung Chun, Tae-Geun Gweon, Hyeon Jeong Goong, Min Seob Kwak, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo-Kyung Park, Jong Hoon Lee
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef

2,672 View
188 Download
1 Crossref

Original Article

Colorectal neoplasia

Clinical characteristics and risk factors related to polyposis recurrence and advanced neoplasm development among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis: Jihun Jang, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim; Intest Res 2023;21(4):510-517. Published online May 31, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2022.00139

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims
Patients with more than 10 cumulative polyps might involve a greater genetic risk of colorectal neoplasia development. However, few studies have investigated the risk factors of polyposis recurrence and development of advanced neoplasms among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis.
Methods
This study included patients (n=855) with 10 or more cumulative polyps diagnosed at Severance Hospital from January 2012 to September 2021. Patients with known genetic mutations related to polyposis, known hereditary polyposis syndromes, insufficient information, total colectomy, and less than 3 years of follow-up were excluded. Finally, 169 patients were included for analysis. We collected clinical data, including colonoscopy surveillance results, and performed Cox regression analyses of risk factors for polyposis recurrence and advanced neoplasm development.
Results
The 169 patients were predominantly male (84.02%), with a mean age of 64.19±9.92 years. The mean number of adenomas on index colonoscopy was 15.33±8.47. Multivariable analysis revealed history of cancer except colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–4.01), current smoking (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.17–4.87), and detection of many polyps (≥15) on index colonoscopy (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.21–3.50) were significant risk factors for recurrence of polyposis. We found no statistically significant risk factors for advanced neoplasm development during surveillance among our cohort.
Conclusions
The presence of many polyps (≥15) on index colonoscopy, history of cancer except colon cancer, and current smoking state were significant risk factors for polyposis recurrence among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Screening and surveillance for hereditary colorectal cancer
Hee Man Kim, Tae Il Kim
Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 119. CrossRef

2,143 View
303 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Review

Cancer

Two intertwined compartments coexisting in sporadic conventional colon adenomas: Carlos A. Rubio; Intest Res 2021;19(1):12-20. Published online February 24, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.00133

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Sporadic conventional colon adenomas are microscopically built of 2 intertwined compartments: one on top, harboring the dysplastic tissue that defines their histo-biomolecular attributes, and the other below, composed of non-dysplastic crypts with corrupted shapes (CCS). The CCS of 306 colon adenomas revealed asymmetric, haphazardly-distributed proliferating cell-domains (PC). In contrast, the PC-domains in normal controls were symmetric, being limited to the lower thirds of the crypts. In 28% out of 501 sporadic conventional adenomas, foci of p53-upregulated dysplastic tissue were found. The CCS in 30% of 108 sporadic adenomas showed p53-upregulated single cells, suggesting mounting somatic mutations. No p53-upregulated cells were found in the crypts of controls. In polypoid adenomas, the mucosa of the stalk without dysplastic tissue on top disclosed CCS with asymmetrical PC-domains and single p53-upregulated cells. The latter observations suggested that CCS had developed prior to and not after the growth of the dysplastic tissue on top. CCS were also found below colon adenomas in carcinogen-treated rats. It is concluded that the 2 intertwined histo-biological compartments of sporadic conventional colon adenomas are probably interdependent components. These findings may open new directions aimed to uncover the link between the normal colonic mucosa and the histogenesis of, conventional adenomas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Calcium, Vitamin D, and Colorectal Cancer
Young-Jo Wi, Soo-Young Na
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 47. CrossRef
Gut Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer
Tae-Geun Gweon
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 56. CrossRef
Summary and comparison of recently updated post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines
Yoon Suk Jung
Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 443. CrossRef
Asymmetric crypt fission in colectomy specimens in patients with ulcerative colitis
Carlos A Rubio, Peter T Schmidt
Journal of Clinical Pathology.2020; : jclinpath-2020-206694. CrossRef

5,729 View
141 Download
5 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Original Articles

Endoscopy

Efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy utilizing the jumbo cup: a prospective study: Hiroshi Hasegawa, Shigeki Bamba, Kenichiro Takahashi, Masaki Murata, Taketo Otsuka, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Takehide Fujimoto, Rie Osak, Hirotsugu Imaeda, Atsushi Nishida, Hiromitsu Ban, Ayano Sonoda, Osamu Inatomi, Masaya Sasaki, Mitsushige Sugimoto, Akira Andoh; Intest Res 2019;17(2):265-272. Published online November 28, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00103

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Background/Aims
There are few prospective studies on cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) using jumbo cup forceps. Therefore, we examined patients with diminutive polyps (5 mm or smaller) treated with CFP using jumbo cup forceps to achieve an adenoma-free colon and also assessed the safety of the procedure and the recurrence rate of missed or residual polyp after CFP by performing follow-up colonoscopy 1 year later.
Methods
We included patients with up to 5 adenomas removed at initial colonoscopy and analyzed data from a total of 361 patients with 573 adenomas. One-year follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 165 patients, at which 251 lesions were confirmed.
Results
The one-bite resection rate with CFP was highest for lesions 3 mm or smaller and decreased significantly with increasing lesion size. Post-procedural hemorrhage was observed in 1 of 573 lesions (0.17%). No perforation was noted. The definite recurrence rate was 0.8% (2/251 lesions). The probable recurrence rate, which was defined as recurrence in the same colorectal segment, was 17%. Adenoma-free colon was achieved in 55% of patients at initial resection. Multivariate analysis revealed that achievement of an adenoma-free colon was significantly associated with number of adenomas and years of endoscopic experience.
Conclusions
CFP using jumbo biopsy forceps was safe and showed a high one-bite resection rate for diminutive lesions of 3 mm or smaller. The low definite recurrence rate confirms the reliability of CFP using jumbo biopsy forceps. Number of adenomas and years of endoscopic experience were key factors in achieving an adenoma-free colon.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi, Roupen Djinbachian, Daniel von Renteln
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2022; 32(2): 241. CrossRef
Cold Snare Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Updates and Recent Developments
Roupen Djinbachian, Daniel von Renteln
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2022; 20(3): 221. CrossRef
Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Joichiro Horii, Ryuta Takenaka, Hiroyuki Nakagawa, Kazuhiro Matsueda, Takao Tsuzuki, Masahide Kita, Yasushi Yamasaki, Takehiro Tanaka, Masaya Iwamuro, Seiji Kawano, Yoshiro Kawahara, Jun Tomoda, Hiroyuki Okada
Endoscopy International Open.2022; 10(06): E712. CrossRef
Endoscopic resection of local recurrences of diminutive polyps by cold forceps polypectomy
Toshio Kuwai, Takuya Yamada, Tatsuya Toyokawa, Tomohiro Kudo, Naoki Esaka, Hajime Ohta, Haruhiro Yamashita, Yasuo Hosoda, Noriko Watanabe, Naohiko Harada
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(3): 363. CrossRef
How to Approach Small Polyps in Colon: Tips and Tricks
Sultan Mahmood, Enrik John Aguila, Asad ur Rahman, Asim Shuja, Steven Bollipo
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 23(4): 328. CrossRef
Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy
Weifeng Lao, Pankaj Prasoon, Gaoyang Cao, Lian Tat Tan, Sheng Dai, Giridhar Hanumappa Devadasar, Xuefeng Huang
Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Rates of Incomplete Resection of 1- to 20-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Roupen Djinbachian, Ryma Iratni, Madeleine Durand, Paola Marques, Daniel von Renteln
Gastroenterology.2020; 159(3): 904. CrossRef
Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis Increases the Risk for Bleeding Following Colonoscopic Polypectomy
Hosim Soh, Jaeyoung Chun, Seung Wook Hong, Seona Park, Yun Bin Lee, Hyun Jung Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Jong Pil Im, Yoon Jun Kim, Joo Sung Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon
Gut and Liver.2020; 14(6): 755. CrossRef

9,668 View
172 Download
7 Web of Science
8 Crossref

Endoscopy

Clinical outcomes of surveillance colonoscopy for patients with sessile serrated adenoma: Sung Jae Park, Hyuk Yoon, In Sub Jung, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Na Young Kim, Dong Ho Lee; Intest Res 2018;16(1):134-141. Published online January 18, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.134

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) are known to be precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC). The proper interval of follow-up colonoscopy for SSAs is still being debated. We sought to determine the proper interval of colonoscopy surveillance in patients diagnosed with SSAs in South Korea.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with SSAs who received 1 or more follow-up colonoscopies. The information reviewed included patient baseline characteristics, SSA characteristics, and colonoscopy information.

Results

From January 2007 to December 2011, 152 SSAs and 8 synchronous adenocarcinomas were identified in 138 patients. The mean age of the patients was 62.2 years and 60.1% patients were men. SSAs were located in the right colon (i.e., from the cecum to the hepatic flexure) in 68.4% patients. At the first follow-up, 27 SSAs were identified in 138 patients (right colon, 66.7%). At the second follow-up, 6 SSAs were identified in 65 patients (right colon, 66.7%). At the 3rd and 4th follow-up, 21 and 11 patients underwent colonoscopy, respectively, and no SSAs were detected. The total mean follow-up duration was 33.9 months. The mean size of SSAs was 8.1±5.0 mm. SSAs were most commonly found in the right colon (126/185, 68.1%). During annual follow-up colonoscopy surveillance, no cancer was detected.

Conclusions

Annual colonoscopy surveillance is not necessary for identifying new CRCs in all patients diagnosed with SSAs. In addition, the right colon should be examined more carefully because SSAs occur more frequently in the right colon during initial and follow-up colonoscopies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Endoscopic Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up of Serrated Polyps
Duk Hwan Kim
Journal of Digestive Cancer Research.2023; 11(1): 30. CrossRef
Features associated with high‐risk sessile serrated polyps at index and follow‐up colonoscopy
Shahzaib Anwar, Charles Cock, Joanne Young, Graeme P Young, Rosie Meng, Kalindra Simpson, Michelle Coats, Junming Huang, Peter Bampton, Robert Fraser, Erin L Symonds
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(6): 1620. CrossRef
Descriptive epidemiological study of South African colorectal cancer patients at a Johannesburg Hospital Academic institution
Michelle McCabe, Yvonne Perner, Rindidzani Magobo, Sheefa Mirza, Clement Penny
JGH Open.2020; 4(3): 360. CrossRef
Associations between molecular characteristics of colorectal serrated polyps and subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia
Xinwei Hua, Polly A. Newcomb, Jessica Chubak, Rachel C. Malen, Rebecca Ziebell, Aruna Kamineni, Lee-Ching Zhu, Melissa P. Upton, Michelle A. Wurscher, Sushma S. Thomas, Hana Newman, Sheetal Hardikar, Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman
Cancer Causes & Control.2020; 31(7): 631. CrossRef
The association between colorectal sessile serrated adenomas/polyps and subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia
Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman, Jessica Chubak, Xinwei Hua, Rebecca Ziebell, Aruna Kamineni, Lee-Ching Zhu, Melissa P. Upton, Rachel C. Malen, Sheetal Hardikar, Polly A. Newcomb
Cancer Causes & Control.2019; 30(9): 979. CrossRef
Surveillance colonoscopy in patients with sessile serrated adenoma
Ji Hyung Nam, Hyoun Woo Kang
Intestinal Research.2018; 16(3): 502. CrossRef

11,791 View
67 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Endoscopy

Three-year colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy in Korea: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter prospective study: Won Seok Choi, Dong Soo Han, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Dong-Hoon Yang, Sung-Ae Jung, Sang Kil Lee, Sung Pil Hong, Cheol Hee Park, Suck-Ho Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Sung Jae Shin, Bora Keum, Hyun Soo Kim, Jung Hye Choi, Sin-Ho Jung; Intest Res 2018;16(1):126-133. Published online January 18, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.126

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Colonoscopic surveillance is currently recommended after polypectomy owing to the risk of newly developed colonic neoplasia. However, few studies have investigated colonoscopy surveillance in Asia. This multicenter and prospective study was undertaken to assess the incidence of advanced adenoma based on baseline adenoma findings at 3 years after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Methods

A total of 1,323 patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively assigned to 3-year colonoscopy surveillance at 11 tertiary endoscopic centers. Relative risks for advanced adenoma after 3 years were calculated according to baseline adenoma characteristics.

Results

Among 1,323 patients enrolled, 387 patients (29.3%) were followed up, and the mean follow-up interval was 31.0±9.8 months. The percentage of patients with advanced adenoma on baseline colonoscopy was higher in the surveillance group compared to the non-surveillance group (34.4% vs. 25.7%). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed in 17 patients (4.4%) at follow-up. The risk of advanced adenoma recurrence was 2 times greater in patients with baseline advanced adenoma than in those with baseline non-advanced adenoma, though the difference was not statistically significant (6.8% [9/133] vs. 3.1% [8/254], P=0.09). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed only in males and in subjects aged ≥50 years. In contrast, adenoma recurrence was observed in 187 patients (48.3%) at follow-up. Male sex, older age (≥50 years), and multiple adenomas (≥3) at baseline were independent risk factors for adenoma recurrence.

Conclusions

A colonoscopy surveillance interval of 3 years in patients with baseline advanced adenoma can be considered appropriate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

When should patients take simethicone orally before colonoscopy for avoiding bubbles: A single-blind, randomized controlled study
Woohyuk Jung, Gyu Man Oh, Jae Hyun Kim, Youn Jung Choi, Min Young Son, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
Medicine.2023; 102(19): e33728. CrossRef
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
Jae Hyun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Tae Oh Kim, Jongha Park, Gyu Man Oh, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29884. CrossRef
Optimization of the surveillance strategy in patients with colorectal adenomas: A combination of clinical parameters and index colonoscopy findings
Chan Hyuk Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(4): 974. CrossRef
Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
Intestinal Research.2021; 19(2): 239. CrossRef
Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after resection of low-risk diminutive versus small adenomas
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(3): 622. CrossRef
Optimal Colonoscopic Surveillance Interval After Normal Baseline Screening Colonoscopy
Jian Dong, Minman Wu, Jiarong Miao, Rana Sami Ullah Khan, Tao Zhi, Tianmei Zhang, Xue Li, Yashi Peng, Gang Yang, Qiong Nan
Gastroenterology Nursing.2020; 43(3): 225. CrossRef
Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of 1- to 5-mm versus 6- to 9-mm adenomas on the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia
Yoon Suk Jung, Tae Jun Kim, Eunwoo Nam, Chan Hyuk Park
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(3): 692. CrossRef
Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of obesity and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in men
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(9): 1504. CrossRef
What Is Appropriate Upper Endoscopic Interval Among Dyspeptic Patients With Previously Normal Endoscopy? A Multicenter Study With Bayesian Change Point Analysis
Jong Wook Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Joong Goo Kwon, Jung Bok Lee, Jong Kyu Park, Ki Bae Bang, Chung Hyun Tae, Jung Hwan Oh
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2019; 25(4): 544. CrossRef
Risk of Developing Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia After Polypectomy in Patients With Multiple Diminutive or Small Adenomas
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(10): 1657. CrossRef

8,935 View
79 Download
12 Web of Science
11 Crossref

Is methylation analysis of SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoters suitable for colorectal cancer screening in the Korean population?: Soo-Kyung Park, Hae Lim Baek, Junghee Yu, Ji Yeon Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Yoon Suk Jung, Kyu Yong Choi, Hungdai Kim, Hyung Ook Kim, Kyung Uk Jeong, Ho-Kyung Chun, Kyungeun Kim, Dong Il Park; Intest Res 2017;15(4):495-501. Published online October 23, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.495

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using stool DNA was recently found to yield good detection rates. A multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard®, Exact Sciences), including methylated genes has been recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this study was to validate these aberrantly methylated genes as stool-based DNA markers for detecting CRC and colorectal advanced adenoma (AA) in the Korean population.

Methods

A single-center study was conducted in 36 patients with AA; 35 patients with CRC; and 40 endoscopically diagnosed healthy controls using CRC screening colonoscopy. The methylation status of the SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoters was investigated blindly using bisulfate-modified stool DNA obtained from 111 participants. Methylation status was investigated by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Methylated SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoters were detected in 60.0%, 31.4%, 68.8%, and 40.0% of CRC samples and in 27.8%, 27.8%, 27.8%, and 33.3% of AA samples, respectively. The sensitivities obtained using 4 markers to detect CRC and AA were 94.3% and 72.2%, respectively. The specificity was 55.0%.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that the SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoter methylation analysis of stool sample DNA showed high sensitivity but low specificity for detecting CRC and AA. Because of the low specificity, 4 methylated markers might not be sufficient for CRC screening in the Korean population. Further large-scale studies are required to validate the methylation of these markers in the Asian population and to find new markers for the Asian population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

DNA methylation modulates epigenetic regulation in colorectal cancer diagnosis, prognosis and precision medicine
Jingxin Ye, Jianfeng Zhang, Weifeng Ding
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy.2024; 5(1): 34. CrossRef
Pathogenesis and biomarkers of colorectal cancer by epigenetic alteration
Chang Kyo Oh, Young-Seok Cho
Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 131. CrossRef
Tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 (TFPI-2)—an underappreciated partaker in cancer and metastasis
Marek Z. Wojtukiewicz, Marta Mysliwiec, Anna Tokajuk, Joanna Kruszewska, Barbara Politynska, Anmbreen Jamroze, Anna M. Wojtukiewicz, Dean G. Tang, Kenneth V. Honn
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Detecting colorectal cancer using genetic and epigenetic biomarkers: screening and diagnosis
Yudith Annisa Ayu Rezkitha, Nur Syahadati Retno Panenggak, Maria Inge Lusida, Raissa Virgy Rianda, Isna Mahmudah, Aditya Doni Pradana, Tomohisa Uchida, Muhammad Miftahussurur
Journal of Medicine and Life.2024; 17(1): 4. CrossRef
In Silico Gene Prioritization Highlights the Significance of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 (BMP4) Promoter Methylation across All Methylation Clusters in Colorectal Cancer
Daša Jevšinek Skok, Nina Hauptman
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(16): 12692. CrossRef
Novel biomarkers used for early diagnosis and tyrosine kinase inhibitors as targeted therapies in colorectal cancer
Huafeng Jiang, Senjun Zhou, Gang Li
Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A novel screening method of DNA methylation biomarkers helps to improve the detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions
Yuan Li, Bin Li, Rou Jiang, Leen Liao, Chunting Zheng, Jie Yuan, Liuhong Zeng, Kunling Hu, Yuyu Zhang, Weijian Mei, Zhigang Hong, Binyi Xiao, Lingheng Kong, Kai Han, Jinghua Tang, Wu Jiang, Zhizhong Pan, Shenyan Zhang, Peirong Ding
Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(21): 20626. CrossRef
Current Research on Molecular Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer in Stool Samples
Patricio Órdenes, Claudio Carril Pardo, Roberto Elizondo-Vega, Karina Oyarce
Biology.2023; 13(1): 15. CrossRef
Beyond liquid biopsy: Toward non-invasive assays for distanced cancer diagnostics in pandemics
Francesco Ferrara, Sofia Zoupanou, Elisabetta Primiceri, Zulfiqur Ali, Maria Serena Chiriacò
Biosensors and Bioelectronics.2022; 196: 113698. CrossRef
Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer
Aneta L. Zygulska, Piotr Pierzchalski
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(2): 852. CrossRef
Diagnostic accuracy of multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Roya Dolatkhah, Saeed Dastgiri, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi, Mohammad Hossein Somi
Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2022; 45(10): 753. CrossRef
Technical considerations in PCR-based assay design for diagnostic DNA methylation cancer biomarkers
Maartje Massen, Kim Lommen, Kim A. D. Wouters, Johan Vandersmissen, Wim van Criekinge, James G. Herman, Veerle Melotte, Leo J. Schouten, Manon van Engeland, Kim M. Smits
Clinical Epigenetics.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
DNA methylation biomarkers in colorectal cancer: Clinical applications for precision medicine
Nayeralsadat Fatemi, Sascha Tierling, Hamidreza Aboulkheyr Es, Maryam Varkiani, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Jörn Walter, Mehdi Totonchi
International Journal of Cancer.2022; 151(12): 2068. CrossRef
Diagnostic accuracy of multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Roya Dolatkhah, Saeed Dastgiri, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi, Mohammad Hossein Somi
Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2022; 45(10): 753. CrossRef
Performance evaluation of stool DNA methylation tests in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Mahir Gachabayov, Edward Lebovics, Aram Rojas, Daniel M Felsenreich, Rifat Latifi, Roberto Bergamaschi
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(5): 1030. CrossRef
Fecal Multidimensional Assay for Non-Invasive Detection of Colorectal Cancer: Fecal Immunochemical Test, Stool DNA Mutation, Methylation, and Intestinal Bacteria Analysis
Shaobo Mo, Hui Wang, Lingyu Han, Wenqiang Xiang, Weixing Dai, Pengfei Zhao, Fengchun Pei, Zhixi Su, Chengcheng Ma, Qi Li, Zhimin Wang, Sanjun Cai, Hao Wang, Rui Liu, Guoxiang Cai
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Identification of DNA methylation markers for early detection of CRC indicates a role for nervous system-related genes in CRC
Glenn Rademakers, Maartje Massen, Alexander Koch, Muriel X. Draht, Nikkie Buekers, Kim A. D. Wouters, Nathalie Vaes, Tim De Meyer, Beatriz Carvalho, Gerrit A. Meijer, James G. Herman, Kim M. Smits, Manon van Engeland, Veerle Melotte
Clinical Epigenetics.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Focus on Non-invasive Biomarkers
Nadia El Kadmiri
Current Drug Targets.2021; 22(9): 1043. CrossRef
RETRACTED: Using Comorbidity Pattern Analysis to Detect Reliable Methylated Genes in Colorectal Cancer Verified by Stool DNA Test
Yi-Chiao Cheng, Po-Hsien Wu, Yen-Ju Chen, Cing-Han Yang, Jhen-Li Huang, Yu-Ching Chou, Pi-Kai Chang, Chia-Cheng Wen, Shu-Wen Jao, Hsin-Hui Huang, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Tun-Wen Pai
Genes.2021; 12(10): 1539. CrossRef
Plausibility of an extensive use of stool DNA test for screening advanced colorectal neoplasia
Jiayi Mu, Yanqin Huang, Shanrong Cai, Qilong Li, Yongmao Song, Ying Yuan, Suzhan Zhang, Shu Zheng
Clinica Chimica Acta.2020; 501: 42. CrossRef
Epigenetics of colorectal cancer: biomarker and therapeutic potential
Gerhard Jung, Eva Hernández-Illán, Leticia Moreira, Francesc Balaguer, Ajay Goel
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2020; 17(2): 111. CrossRef
Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer
Hyung-Hoon Oh, Young-Eun Joo
Intestinal Research.2020; 18(2): 168. CrossRef
Fecal DNA methylation markers for detecting stages of colorectal cancer and its precursors: a systematic review
Janhavi R. Raut, Zhong Guan, Petra Schrotz-King, Hermann Brenner
Clinical Epigenetics.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Hypermethylated Promoters of Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein Genes are Associated with Colorectal Cancer
Haochang Hu, Tiangong Wang, Ranran Pan, Yong Yang, Bin Li, Cong Zhou, Jun Zhao, Yi Huang, Shiwei Duan
Pathology & Oncology Research.2019; 25(2): 567. CrossRef
BMP3 promoter hypermethylation in plasma-derived cell-free DNA in colorectal cancer patients
Parisa Rokni, Afsaneh Mojtabanezhad Shariatpanahi, Ebrahim Sakhinia, Mohammad Amin Kerachian
Genes & Genomics.2018; 40(4): 423. CrossRef
Syndecan-2 Methylation as a New Biomarker for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasm
Ji Hyun Kim, Sung Chul Park
Gut and Liver.2018; 12(5): 479. CrossRef

6,328 View
94 Download
26 Web of Science
26 Crossref

Clinical characteristics of patients with serrated polyposis syndrome in Korea: comparison with Western patients: Eun Ran Kim, Jaryong Jeon, Jin Hee Lee, Yoon Jung Lee, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim; Intest Res 2017;15(3):402-410. Published online June 12, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.402

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) has been shown to increase the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, little is known about the characteristics of Asian patients with SPS. This study aimed to identify the clinicopathological features and risk of CRC in Korean patients with SPS as well as the differences between Korean and Western patients based on a literature review.

Methods

This retrospective study included 30 patients with SPS as defined by World Health Organization classification treated at Samsung Medical Center, Korea, between March 1999 and May 2011.

Results

Twenty patients (67%) were male. The median patient age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 39–76 years). A total of 702 polyps were identified during a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 0–149 months). Serrated polyps were noted more frequently in the distal colon (298/702, 55%). However, large serrated polyps and serrated adenomas were mainly distributed throughout the proximal colon (75% vs. 25% and 81% vs. 19%, respectively); 73.3% had synchronous adenomatous polyps. The incidence of CRC was 10% (3/30 patients), but no interval CRC was detected. A total of 87% of the patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 19.2% had significant lesions.

Conclusions

The phenotype of SPS in Korean patients is different from that of Western patients. In Korean patients, SPS is more common in men, there were fewer total numbers of serrated adenoma/polyps, and the incidence of CRC was lower than that in Western patients. Korean patients tend to more frequently have abnormal gastric lesions. However, the prevalence of synchronous adenomatous polyps is high in both Western and Korean patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Charles Muller, Akihiro Yamada, Sachie Ikegami, Haider Haider, Yuga Komaki, Fukiko Komaki, Dejan Micic, Atsushi Sakuraba
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 20(3): 622. CrossRef
Synchronized early gastric cancer occurred in a patient with serrated polyposis syndrome: A case report
Ying-Ze Ning, Guan-Yi Liu, Xiao-Long Rao, Yong-Chen Ma, Long Rong
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(8): 2644. CrossRef
Usefulness of narrow-band imaging for the detection of remnant sessile-serrated adenoma (SSA) tissue after endoscopic resection: the KASID multicenter study
Yunho Jung, Jung Rock Moon, Seong Ran Jeon, Jae Myung Cha, Hyo-Joon Yang, Suyeon Park, Yumi Ahn, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyun Gun Kim
Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(9): 5217. CrossRef
Serrated Polyposis Syndrome with a Synchronous Colon Adenocarcinoma Treated by an Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Sang Hoon Lee, Sung Joon Lee, Sung Chul Park, Seung-Joo Nam, Myeong Ho Kang, Tae Suk Kim, Seung Koo Lee
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 76(3): 159. CrossRef

7,048 View
69 Download
7 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected colorectal cancers that arose from sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas: Ji Yeon Seo, Seung Ho Choi, Jaeyoung Chun, Changhyun Lee, Ji Min Choi, Eun Hyo Jin, Sung Wook Hwang, Jong Pil Im, Sang Gyun Kim, Joo Sung Kim; Intest Res 2016;14(3):270-279. Published online June 27, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.3.270

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of colorectal cancer derived from sessile serrated adenomas or traditional serrated adenomas are still unknown. The aims of this study were to verify the characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected early colorectal cancers developed from serrated polyps.

Methods

Among patients who received endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancers from 2008 to 2011, cancers with documented pre-existing lesions were included. They were classified as adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma, or traditional serrated adenoma according to the baseline lesions. Clinical characteristics, pathologic diagnosis, and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

Overall, 208 colorectal cancers detected from 198 patients were included: 198 with adenoma, five with sessile serrated adenoma, and five with traditional serrated adenoma. The sessile serrated adenoma group had a higher prevalence of high-grade dysplasia (40.0% vs. 25.8%, P<0.001) than the adenoma group. During follow-up, local recurrence did not occur after endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancers developed from serrated polyps. In contrast, two cases of metachronous recurrence were detected within a short follow-up period.

Conclusions

Cautious observation and early endoscopic resection are recommended when colorectal cancer from serrated polyp is suspected. Colorectal cancers from serrated polyp can be treated successfully with endoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Small sessile serrated polyps might not be at a higher risk for future advanced neoplasia than low-risk adenomas or polyp-free groups
Eun Hyo Jin, Ji Yeon Seo, Jung Ho Bae, Jooyoung Lee, Ji Min Choi, Yoo Min Han, Joo Hyun Lim
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(1): 99. CrossRef
The incidence and risk factors of sessile serrated adenomas in left side colon cancer patients after curative surgery
Myung Hee Kim, Hee Seok Moon, In Sun Kwon, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Jae Kyu Sung, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
Medicine.2020; 99(29): e20799. CrossRef
Improved Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Following a Comprehensive Training Program
Jung Ho Bae, Changhyun Lee, Hae Yeon Kang, Min-Sun Kwak, Eun Young Doo, Ji Yeon Seo, Ji Hyun Song, Sun Young Yang, Jong In Yang, Seon Hee Lim, Jeong Yoon Yim, Joo Hyun Lim, Goh Eun Chung, Su Jin Chung, Eun Hyo Jin, Boram Park, Joo Sung Kim
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 17(12): 2479. CrossRef
Clinical outcomes of surveillance colonoscopy for patients with sessile serrated adenoma
Sung Jae Park, Hyuk Yoon, In Sub Jung, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Na Young Kim, Dong Ho Lee
Intestinal Research.2018; 16(1): 134. CrossRef
Surveillance colonoscopy in patients with sessile serrated adenoma
Ji Hyung Nam, Hyoun Woo Kang
Intestinal Research.2018; 16(3): 502. CrossRef
Identification of risk factors for sessile and traditional serrated adenomas of the colon by using big data analysis
Jeung Hui Pyo, Sang Yun Ha, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Hee Jung Son, Kyoung‐Mee Kim, Hyeseung Kim, Kyunga Kim, Jee Eun Kim, Yoon‐Ho Choi, Young‐Ho Kim
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2018; 33(5): 1039. CrossRef
Endoscopic Resection of Cecal Polyps Involving the Appendiceal Orifice: A KASID Multicenter Study
Eun Mi Song, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Jung Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun Gun Kim, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon, Byung Chang Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2017; 62(11): 3138. CrossRef
Is colorectal cancer screening necessary before 50 years of age?
Yoon Suk Jung
Intestinal Research.2017; 15(4): 550. CrossRef
Derivation and validation of a risk scoring model to predict advanced colorectal neoplasm in adults of all ages
Hyo‐Joon Yang, Sungkyoung Choi, Soo‐Kyung Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Kyu Yong Choi, Taesung Park, Ji Yeon Kim, Dong Il Park
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(7): 1328. CrossRef
Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy
Jeonghun Lee, Sung Won Park, You Sun Kim, Kyung Jin Lee, Hyun Sung, Pil Hun Song, Won Jae Yoon, Jeong Seop Moon
Medicine.2017; 96(27): e7468. CrossRef

5,804 View
55 Download
11 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Is Retroflexion Helpful in Detecting Adenomas in the Right Colon?: A Single Center Interim Analysis: Hyun Seok Lee, Seong Woo Jeon; Intest Res 2015;13(4):326-331. Published online October 15, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.326

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Colonoscopy is less effective at screening for colorectal cancer in the right side of the colon. Retroflexion during colonoscopy is expected to improve the detection rate of colorectal adenomas. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of retroflexion in the right-sided colon.

Methods

From April to November 2013, a total of 398 patients were enrolled in this study. For each patient, a cap-assisted colonoscopic examination was performed. After cecal intubation, a forward view examination from the cecum up to the hepatic flexure was performed and all identified polyps were removed. The colonoscope was reinserted to the cecum, and a careful second forward view examination of the cecum to the hepatic flexure was performed, with removal of additionally identified polyps. The colonoscope was then reinserted to the cecum and retroflexed; a third colonoscopic examination was then performed to the hepatic flexure in retroflexion with removal of additional polyps. Total polyp numbers and characteristics were compared between the two forward view examinations and the retroflexion examination.

Results

A successful retroflexion was performed in 90.2% of patients. A total of 213 polyps and 143 adenomas were detected in the right-sided colon using the routine method of examining the right colon twice in forward view. An additional 35 polyps and 24 adenomas were detected on retroflexion. Of these 35 polyps, 27 (77.1%) were small-sized polyps (≤5 mm) and 24 (71.4%) were adenomas. Finding additional adenomas using the retroflexion technique was associated with older age.

Conclusions

Colonoscopic retroflexion is helpful in the detection of cecum and ascending colon adenomas, especially small-sized adenomas (≤5 mm). It is particularly useful in older patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison in the development of colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy between elderly and younger population
Kazuki Yamamoto, Takashi Ikeya, Katsuyuki Fukuda, Daiki Kobayashi
European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2022; 31(6): 505. CrossRef
Success, safety, and usefulness of right colon retroflexion for the detection of additional colonic lesions not visualized with standard frontal view
Oscar Nogales, Jon de la Maza, Esperanza Martos, Laura Carrión, Rodrigo Borobia, Luis Lucendo, María López-Ibáñez, Javier García-Lledó, Leticia Pérez-Carazo, Beatriz Merino
Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(2): 620. CrossRef
Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
Keshu Shan, Hongpeng Lu, Zhixin Zhang, Jiarong Xie, Lu Xu, Weihong Wang, Chunjiu Hu, Lei Xu
BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines
Yutaka Saito, Shiro Oka, Takuji Kawamura, Ryo Shimoda, Masau Sekiguchi, Naoto Tamai, Kinichi Hotta, Takahisa Matsuda, Masashi Misawa, Shinji Tanaka, Yosuke Iriguchi, Ryoichi Nozaki, Hironori Yamamoto, Masahiro Yoshida, Kazuma Fujimoto, Haruhiro Inoue
Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 33(4): 486. CrossRef
Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Shengbing Zhao, Shuling Wang, Peng Pan, Tian Xia, Xin Chang, Xia Yang, Liliangzi Guo, Qianqian Meng, Fan Yang, Wei Qian, Zhichao Xu, Yuanqiong Wang, Zhijie Wang, Lun Gu, Rundong Wang, Fangzhou Jia, Jun Yao, Zhaoshen Li, Yu Bai
Gastroenterology.2019; 156(6): 1661. CrossRef
Impact of obesity and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in men
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(9): 1504. CrossRef
Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate
Martin Buerger, Philipp Kasper, Gabriel Allo, Johannes Gillessen, Christoph Schramm
BMC Gastroenterology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients aged 30 to 39 and 40 to 49 years
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 88(4): 715. CrossRef
Parameters of Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Affect the Occurrence of Colorectal Adenomas Detected by Surveillance Colonoscopies
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Yul Suh, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Yonsei Medical Journal.2017; 58(2): 347. CrossRef
Metformin use and the risk of colorectal adenoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Dong Soo Han
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(5): 957. CrossRef
Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy
Jeonghun Lee, Sung Won Park, You Sun Kim, Kyung Jin Lee, Hyun Sung, Pil Hun Song, Won Jae Yoon, Jeong Seop Moon
Medicine.2017; 96(27): e7468. CrossRef
Identifying the optimal strategy for screening of advanced colorectal neoplasia
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(5): 1003. CrossRef
Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis
Madhav Desai, Andre Sanchez-Yague, Abhishek Choudhary, Asad Pervez, Neil Gupta, Prashanth Vennalaganti, Sreekar Vennelaganti, Alessandro Fugazza, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Prateek Sharma
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 86(2): 274. CrossRef
Risk Factors for False Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2017; 51(2): 151. CrossRef
Are Hemorrhoids Associated with False-Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results?
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Yonsei Medical Journal.2017; 58(1): 150. CrossRef
Association Between Low Relative Muscle Mass and the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasms
Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Seungho Ryu, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2017; 51(10): e83. CrossRef
Metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for adenoma occurrence at surveillance colonoscopy
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Medicine.2016; 95(32): e4454. CrossRef
Asymptomatic anisakiasis of the colon incidentally diagnosed and treated during colonoscopy by retroflexion in the ascending colon
Mamiko Tsukui, Naoki Morimoto, Hidekazu Kurata, Fumiko Sunada
Journal of Rural Medicine.2016; 11(2): 73. CrossRef
Identifying the ‘Right’ colon lesion
A D Hopper, P D Mooney, A Blakeborough
Gut.2016; 65(12): 1959. CrossRef
Does Low Threshold Value Use Improve Proximal Neoplasia Detection by Fecal Immunochemical Test?
Nam Hee Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Soo-Kyung Park, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2016; 61(9): 2685. CrossRef

5,301 View
32 Download
21 Web of Science
20 Crossref

Colonic Chicken Skin Mucosa is an Independent Endoscopic Predictor of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma: Eun Ju Chung, Ji Young Lee, Jaewon Choe, Hye-Sook Chang, Jongcheol Kim, Dong Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Kyung-Jo Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Seung-Jae Myung; Intest Res 2015;13(4):318-325. Published online October 15, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.318

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Chicken skin mucosa (CSM), surrounding colorectal adenoma, is an endoscopic finding with pale yellow-speckled mucosa; however, its clinical significance is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of CSM, and the association between colorectal carcinogenesis and CSM.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed in 733 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomy for colorectal adenoma after the screening of colonoscopy at the Asan Health Promotion Center between June 2009 and December 2011. The colonoscopic and pathological findings of colorectal adenoma including number, size, location, dysplasia, morphology, and clinical parameters were reviewed.

Results

The prevalence of CSM was 30.7% (225 of 733 patients), and most CSM-related adenomas were located in the distal colon (93.3%). Histological analysis revealed lipid-laden macrophages in the lamina propria of the mucosa. Multivariate analyses showed that CSM was significantly associated with advanced pathology, including villous adenoma and high-grade dysplasia (odds ratio [OR], 2.078; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.191-3.627; P=0.010), multiple adenomas (i.e., ≥2 adenomas; OR, 1.692; 95% CI, 1.143-2.507; P=0.009), and a protruding morphology (OR, 1.493; 95% CI, 1.027-2.170; P=0.036). There were no significant differences in polyp size or clinical parameters between patients with and without CSM.

Conclusions

CSM-related adenoma was mainly found in the distal colon, and was associated with advanced pathology and multiple adenomas. CSM could be a potential predictive marker of the carcinogenetic progression of distally located colorectal adenomas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Mucosa color and size may indicate malignant transformation of chicken skin mucosa-positive colorectal neoplastic polyps
Ying-Jie Zhang, Meng-Xia Yuan, Wu Wen, Fan Li, Yi Jian, Chuan-Ming Zhang, Ye Yang, Feng-Lin Chen
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(3): 750. CrossRef
White spots around colorectal tumors are cancer-related findings and may aid endoscopic diagnosis: a prospective study in Japan
Kai Korekawa, Yusuke Shimoyama, Fumiyoshi Fujishima, Hiroshi Nagai, Takeo Naito, Rintaro Moroi, Hisashi Shiga, Yoichi Kakuta, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(5): 637. CrossRef
Solitary juvenile polyp of the rectum with intramucosal adenocarcinoma
Kazuki Nagai, Uichiro Fuchizaki, Yoshimichi Ueda
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 16(4): 532. CrossRef
Chicken skin mucosa surrounding small colorectal cancer could be an endoscopic predictive marker of submucosal invasion
Ying-Jie Zhang, Wu Wen, Fan Li, Yi Jian, Chuan-Ming Zhang, Meng-Xia Yuan, Ye Yang, Feng-Lin Chen
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2023; 15(6): 1062. CrossRef
Characteristics and potential malignancy of colorectal juvenile polyps in adults: a single-center retrospective study in China
Jie Dong, Tian-Shi Ma, Yuan-Hong Xu, Peng Li, Wan-Yuan Chen, Jiang-Feng Tu, You-Wei Chen
BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Colonic Chicken Skin Mucosa Surrounding Colon Polyps Is an Endoscopic Predictive Marker for Colonic Neoplastic Polyps
Yu Mi Lee, Kyung Ho Song, Hoon Sup Koo, Choong-Sik Lee, Inseok Ko, Sang Hyuk Lee, Kyu Chan Huh
Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 754. CrossRef
Diagnosis and management of a solitary colorectal juvenile polyp in an adult during follow-up for ulcerative colitis: A case report
You-Wei Chen, Jiang-Feng Tu, Wen-Juan Shen, Wan-Yuan Chen, Jie Dong
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(8): 877. CrossRef
Hepatitis B Virus Infection Is Independently Associated With Advanced Colorectal Adenoma
Su Hwan Kim, Ji Won Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Seohui Lee, Seong-Joon Koh, Ji Bong Jeong, Byeong Gwan Kim
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2018; 356(2): 141. CrossRef
Current strategies for malignant pedunculated colorectal polyps
Adriana Ciocalteu, Dan Ionut Gheonea, Adrian Saftoiu, Liliana Streba, Nicoleta Alice Dragoescu, Tiberiu Stefanita Tenea-Cojan
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2018; 10(12): 465. CrossRef

5,521 View
75 Download
11 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Inhibitory Effect of Metformin Therapy on the Incidence of Colorectal Advanced Adenomas in Patients With Diabetes: Yo Han Kim, Ran Noh, Sun Young Cho, Seong Jun Park, Soung Min Jeon, Hyun Deok Shin, Suk Bae Kim, Jeong Eun Shin; Intest Res 2015;13(2):145-152. Published online April 27, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.2.145

Abstract PDF PubReader

Background/Aims

Metformin use has been associated with decreased colorectal cancer risk and mortality among diabetic patients. Recent research suggests that metformin use may decrease the incidence of colorectal adenomas in diabetic patients with previous colorectal cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical effect of metformin use on the development of colorectal adenomas in diabetic patients without previous colorectal cancer.

Methods

Among 604 consecutive diabetic patients who underwent colonoscopic surveillance after initial colonoscopy between January 2002 and June 2012, 240 patients without previous colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study and were divided in two groups: 151 patients receiving metformin and 89 patients not receiving metformin. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics as well as the colorectal adenoma incidence rate were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The incidence rate of total colorectal adenomas was not different according to metformin use (P=0.349). However, the advanced adenoma incidence rate was significantly lower in the metformin group compared with the non-metformin group (relative risk [RR], 0.09; P=0.011). Metformin use was independently associated with a decreased incidence of advanced colorectal adenomas after adjustment for clinically relevant factors (RR, 0.072; P=0.016). In addition, the cumulative development rate of advanced adenomas during follow-up was significantly lower in the metformin group compared with the non-metformin group (P=0.007).

Conclusions

Metformin use in diabetic patients without previous colorectal cancer is associated with a lower risk of advanced colorectal adenomas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Metformin Use Is Inversely Associated with Prevalent, but Not Incident Colorectal Adenomas
Anna Krigel, Snow Trinh T. Nguyen, Nawar Talukder, Ching-Ho Huang, Carlos Buitrago, Gabriel Karkenny, Benjamin Lebwohl, Julian A. Abrams, James L. Araujo
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4886. CrossRef
The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Second Primary Malignancies in Colorectal Cancer Patients
Jana Halamkova, Tomas Kazda, Lucie Pehalova, Roman Gonec, Sarka Kozakova, Lucia Bohovicova, Ondrej Slaby, Regina Demlova, Marek Svoboda, Igor Kiss
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Suppressive effects of metformin on colorectal adenoma incidence and malignant progression
Min Deng, Siqin Lei, Dongdong Huang, Hui Wang, Shuli Xia, Enping Xu, Yihua Wu, Honghe Zhang
Pathology - Research and Practice.2020; 216(2): 152775. CrossRef
Metformin and colorectal cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
Cheng-Ann Winston Ng, Amy Aimei Jiang, Emma Min Shuen Toh, Cheng Han Ng, Zhi Hao Ong, Siyu Peng, Hui Yu Tham, Raghav Sundar, Choon Seng Chong, Chin Meng Khoo
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(8): 1501. CrossRef
Cirrhosis and insulin resistance: current knowledge, pathophysiological mechanisms, complications and potential treatments
Frédéric Clarembeau, Georgia Bale, Nicolas Lanthier
Clinical Science.2020; 134(16): 2117. CrossRef
Age at menarche and risk of colorectal adenoma
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2019; 34(5): 998. CrossRef
Diabetes Mellitus: a Clinical Condition Associated with Metabolic Syndrome and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Vesna Brzacki, Aleksandar Nagorni, Manolis Kallistratos, Athanasios Manolis, Dragan Lovic
Current Pharmacology Reports.2019; 5(4): 205. CrossRef
Diabetes Mellitus and Colon Carcinogenesis: Expectation for Inhibition of Colon Carcinogenesis by Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs
Junichi Kato, Yohei Shirakami, Masahito Shimizu
Gastrointestinal Disorders.2019; 1(2): 273. CrossRef
Metformin Is Associated With Reduced Odds for Colorectal Cancer Among Persons With Diabetes
Joshua Demb, Armaan Yaseyyedi, Lin Liu, Ranier Bustamante, Ashley Earles, Pradipta Ghosh, J. Silvio Gutkind, Andrew J. Gawron, Tonya R. Kaltenbach, Maria Elena Martinez, Samir Gupta
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2019; 10(11): e00092. CrossRef
Metformin in colorectal cancer: molecular mechanism, preclinical and clinical aspects
Muhamad Noor Alfarizal Kamarudin, Md. Moklesur Rahman Sarker, Jin-Rong Zhou, Ishwar Parhar
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a lower incidence of colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer
Hee Seung Lee, Sung Bae Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo Jung Park, Sung Pil Hong, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Tae Il Kim
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(3): 688. CrossRef
Metformin use and the risk of colorectal adenoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Dong Soo Han
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(5): 957. CrossRef
The effect of metformin on the recurrence of colorectal adenoma in diabetic patients with previous colorectal adenoma
Min Seok Han, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo Jung Park, Sung Pil Hong, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Tae Il Kim
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(8): 1223. CrossRef
Ursodeoxycholic acid inhibits the proliferation of colon cancer cells by regulating oxidative stress and cancer stem-like cell growth
Eun-Kyung Kim, Jae Hee Cho, EuiJoo Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Aamir Ahmad
PLOS ONE.2017; 12(7): e0181183. CrossRef
Serum CEA and CA 19-9 Levels are Associated with the Presence and Severity of Colorectal Neoplasia
Nam Hee Kim, Mi Yeon Lee, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Yonsei Medical Journal.2017; 58(5): 918. CrossRef
Synergistic Benefit of Statin and Metformin in Gastrointestinal Malignancies
George K. Nimako, Zachary A. P. Wintrob, Dmitriy A. Sulik, Jennifer L. Donato, Alice C. Ceacareanu
Journal of Pharmacy Practice.2017; 30(2): 185. CrossRef
Risk Factors for False Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2017; 51(2): 151. CrossRef
Parameters of Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Affect the Occurrence of Colorectal Adenomas Detected by Surveillance Colonoscopies
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Yul Suh, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Yonsei Medical Journal.2017; 58(2): 347. CrossRef
Are Hemorrhoids Associated with False-Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results?
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Yonsei Medical Journal.2017; 58(1): 150. CrossRef
Association Between Low Relative Muscle Mass and the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasms
Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Seungho Ryu, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2017; 51(10): e83. CrossRef
Metformin therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis
Yi-Chao Hou, Qiang Hu, Jiao Huang, Jing-Yuan Fang, Hua Xiong
Oncotarget.2017; 8(5): 8843. CrossRef
Metformin therapy and risk of colorectal adenomas and colorectal cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Feifei Liu, Lijing Yan, Zhan Wang, Yuanan Lu, Yuanyuan Chu, Xiangyu Li, Yisi Liu, Dongsheng Rui, Shaofa Nie, Hao Xiang
Oncotarget.2017; 8(9): 16017. CrossRef
Kaffee senkt Rückfallrate bei Patienten mit Kolonkarzinom im Stadium III
Michael Fink
Info Onkologie.2016; 19(4): 24. CrossRef
Oxidative stress and metabolic disorders: Pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies
Vibha Rani, Gagan Deep, Rakesh K. Singh, Komaraiah Palle, Umesh C.S. Yadav
Life Sciences.2016; 148: 183. CrossRef
Weight Change and Obesity Are Associated with a Risk of Adenoma Recurrence
Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2016; 61(9): 2694. CrossRef

13,512 View
34 Download
26 Web of Science
25 Crossref

Alcohol Drinking Increased the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Adenomas: Yoon Kyung Song, Young Sook Park, Choon Sik Seon, Hye Jin Lim, Byung Kwan Son, Sang Bong Ahn, Young Kwan Jo, Seong Hwan Kim, Yun Ju Jo, Ji Hyun Lee, Seung Chan Kim; Intest Res 2015;13(1):74-79. Published online January 29, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.1.74

Abstract PDF PubReader

Background/Aims

Age, sex, gene and life style are modulating risks for colon cancer. Although alcohol intake may impact on colorectal adenoma, clear association has not been established yet. We aimed to investigate effects of alcohol consumption on the characteristics of colorectal adenoma.

Methods

Patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy of colorectal adenoma in the department of gastroenterology of Eulji hospital through 2005 to 2012, having both blood tests and ultrasound or abdominal CT examination were enrolled. The alcohol drinking patients were subdivided into normal or abnormal laboratory group, and alcoholic liver diseases group.

Results

212 patients with colorectal adenoma were analyzed; advanced adenoma and multiple adenoma were found in 68 (32.0%) and 79 (37.2%) patients. When compared to the nondrinker group (120/212 patients), the alcohol drinker group (92/212 patients) represented significantly high odds ratios (ORs) for advanced adenoma (OR, 2.697; P=0.002), and multiple adenoma (OR, 1.929; P=0.039). Among alcohol drinker (92 patients), the ORs of advanced adenoma were 6.407 (P=0.003) in alcoholic liver diseases group (17 patients), 3.711 (P=0.002) in the alcohol drinker with abnormal lab (24 patients), and 2.184 (P=0.034), in the alcohol drinker with normal lab (51 patients) compared to nondrinker group.

Conclusions

This study showed that alcohol drinking may influence on the development of advanced colorectal adenoma and multiplicity. Especially in the group with alcoholic liver diseases and with abnormal lab presented significantly higher ORs of advanced adenoma.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Association between severe hepatic steatosis examined by Fibroscan and the risk of high-risk colorectal neoplasia
Kwang Woo Kim, Hyoun Woo Kang, Hosun Yoo, Yukyung Jun, Hyun Jung Lee, Jong Pil Im, Ji Won Kim, Joo Sung Kim, Seong-Joon Koh, Yong Jin Jung, Atsushi Hosui
PLOS ONE.2022; 17(12): e0279242. CrossRef
Value of combined detection of IFOBT, tumor markers, and inflammatory markers in predicting occurrence of advanced colorectal adenoma
Xu Wang, Jing-Yu Zhang, Zhong-Qing Zheng, Tao Wang, Mei-Yu Piao, Heng Liu, Jing Liu, Wen-Tian Liu
World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2021; 29(7): 347. CrossRef
Prevalence of Colorectal Polyps Based on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Muscle Strength, Health Behavior, and Abdominal Obesity in Asymptomatic Elderly
Shiyu Zhang, Junyong Zhang, Yonghwan Kim, Wangyang Zhang
Healthcare.2021; 9(10): 1400. CrossRef
Associations of Novel Dietary and Lifestyle Inflammation Scores With Incident Colorectal Cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study
Doratha A Byrd, Suzanne E Judd, W Dana Flanders, Terryl J Hartman, Veronika Fedirko, Tanya Agurs-Collins, Roberd M Bostick
JNCI Cancer Spectrum.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Adenoma Characteristics and the Influence of Alcohol and Cigarette Consumption on the Development of Advanced Colorectal Adenomas
Maja Čebohin, Senka Samardžić, Ksenija Marjanović, Martina Tot Vesić, Kristina Kralik, Andreja Bartulić, Dijana Hnatešen
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(22): 8296. CrossRef
Associations of Novel Dietary and Lifestyle Inflammation Scores with Incident, Sporadic Colorectal Adenoma
Doratha A. Byrd, Suzanne Judd, W. Dana Flanders, Terryl J. Hartman, Veronika Fedirko, Roberd M. Bostick
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2020; 29(11): 2300. CrossRef
Age at menarche and risk of colorectal adenoma
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2019; 34(5): 998. CrossRef
Interplay of Liver Disease and Gut Microbiota in the Development of Colorectal Neoplasia
Michael W. Gleeson
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2019; 17(3): 378. CrossRef
Gallbladder stones and gallbladder polyps associated with increased risk of colorectal adenoma in men
Yen‐Ling Liu, Jin‐Shang Wu, Yi‐Ching Yang, Feng‐Hwa Lu, Chih‐Ting Lee, Wan‐Ju Lin, Chih‐Jen Chang
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2018; 33(4): 800. CrossRef
The fecal immunochemical test has high accuracy for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia before age 50
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Digestive and Liver Disease.2017; 49(5): 557. CrossRef
Risk Factors for False Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2017; 51(2): 151. CrossRef
Sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia
Youn Su Park, Ji Won Kim, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Jae Kyung Lee, Joo Sung Kim, Seong-Joon Koh
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(4): 557. CrossRef
Alcoholic Liver Disease Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Gastric Cancer
Tae Hoon Ha, Byeong Gwan Kim, Donghyong Jeong, Sohee Oh, Won Kim, Yong Jin Jung, Dong Won Ahn, Ji Bong Jeong, Ji Won Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Seong-Joon Koh
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2017; 62(1): 273. CrossRef
Metformin therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis
Yi-Chao Hou, Qiang Hu, Jiao Huang, Jing-Yuan Fang, Hua Xiong
Oncotarget.2017; 8(5): 8843. CrossRef
Statin use and the risk of colorectal adenoma: A meta‐analysis
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Dong Soo Han
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(11): 1823. CrossRef
Weight Change and Obesity Are Associated with a Risk of Adenoma Recurrence
Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2016; 61(9): 2694. CrossRef
Metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for adenoma occurrence at surveillance colonoscopy
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Medicine.2016; 95(32): e4454. CrossRef
Characteristics of and risk factors for colorectal neoplasms in young adults in a screening population
Seung Eun Lee, Hee Bum Jo, Won Gun Kwack, Yun Jin Jeong, Yeo-Jin Yoon, Hyoun Woo Kang
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(10): 2981. CrossRef
Does Low Threshold Value Use Improve Proximal Neoplasia Detection by Fecal Immunochemical Test?
Nam Hee Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Soo-Kyung Park, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2016; 61(9): 2685. CrossRef
Associations between amount of smoking and alcohol intake and risk of colorectal neoplasm
Yoon Suk Jung, Hwanseok Jung, Kyung Eun Yun, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Dong Il Park, Kyuyong Choi
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(4): 788. CrossRef
Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015?
Martin Floer, Tobias Meister
Digestion.2016; 93(3): 202. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer in Thailand
Kirati Poomphakwaen, Supannee Promthet, Krittika Suwanrungruang, Siriporn Kamsa-ard, Surapon Wiangnon
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 16(14): 6105. CrossRef

4,902 View
36 Download
22 Web of Science
22 Crossref

Does Metformin Affect The Incidence of Colonic Polyps and Adenomas in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?: Youn Hee Cho, Bong Min Ko, Shin Hee Kim, Yu Sik Myung, Jong Hyo Choi, Jae Pil Han, Su Jin Hong, Seong Ran Jeon, Hyun Gun Kim, Jin Oh Kim, Moon Sung Lee; Intest Res 2014;12(2):139-145. Published online April 29, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2014.12.2.139

Abstract PDF PubReader

Background/Aims

Colorectal cancer (CRC) develops from colonic adenomas. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a higher risk of CRC and metformin decreases CRC risk. However, it is not certain if metformin affects the development of colorectal polyps and adenomas. This study aimed to elucidate if metforminaffects the incidence of colonic polyps and adenomas in patients with type 2 DM.

Methods

Of 12,186 patients with type 2 DM, 3,775 underwent colonoscopy between May 2001 and March 2013. This study enrolled 3,105 of these patients, and divided them in two groups: 912 patients with metformin use and 2,193 patients without metformin use. Patient clinical characteristics, polyp and adenoma detection rate in the two groups were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

The Colorectal polyp detection rate was lower in the metformin group than in the non-meformin group (39.4% vs. 62.4%, P<0.01). Colorectal adenoma detection rate was significantly lower in the metformin group than in the non-metformin group (15.2% vs. 20.5%, P<0.01). Fewer advanced adenomas were detected in the metformin group than in the non-metformin group (12.2% vs. 22%, P<0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age, sex, Body mass index and metformin use as factors associated with polyp incidence, whereas only metforminwas independently associated with decreased adenoma incidence (Odd ratio=0.738, 95% CI=0.554-0.983, P=0.03).

Conclusions

In patients with type 2 DM, metformin reduced the incidence of adenomas that may transform into CRC. Therefore, metformin may be useful for the prevention of CRC in patients with type 2 DM.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Is Metformin Associated with a Lower Prevalence of Polyps, Adenomas, and Colorectal Carcinoma in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus?
Maria Inês Canha, Gonçalo Ramos, Rita Prata, Pedro Lages Martins, Marta Viúla Ramos, João Coimbra
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(1): 435. CrossRef
Metformin administration in prevention of colorectal polyps in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients
Xiao-Qing Wu, Li-Hua Deng, Qian Xue, Xia Li, Meng-Han Li, Jing-Tong Wang
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2024; 12(20): 4206. CrossRef
Anti-cancer Efficacy of Metformin: Recent Updates on Breast and Other Cancers
Md. Imtiazul Kabir, Robin Kumar, Lakshmi Sai Pratyusha Bugata, Komal Raina
Current Pharmacology Reports.2023; 9(5): 284. CrossRef
Metformin Use Is Inversely Associated with Prevalent, but Not Incident Colorectal Adenomas
Anna Krigel, Snow Trinh T. Nguyen, Nawar Talukder, Ching-Ho Huang, Carlos Buitrago, Gabriel Karkenny, Benjamin Lebwohl, Julian A. Abrams, James L. Araujo
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4886. CrossRef
Effect of metformin on thyroid cancer risk in patients with acromegaly: A preliminary observational study
Cem Sulu, Ayyuce Begum Bektas, Suleyman Sami Guzel, Kubilay Tay, Serdar Sahin, Emre Durcan, Hande Mefkure Ozkaya, Pinar Kadioglu
Growth Hormone & IGF Research.2022; 66: 101484. CrossRef
Metformin Modifies the Gut Microbiota of Mice Infected with Helicobacter pylori
Marine Jauvain, Sarah Courtois, Philippe Lehours, Emilie Bessède
Pharmaceuticals.2021; 14(4): 329. CrossRef
Bovine Meat and Milk Factors (BMMFs): Their Proposed Role in Common Human Cancers and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Ethel-Michele de Villiers, Harald zur Hausen
Cancers.2021; 13(21): 5407. CrossRef
Suppressive effects of metformin on colorectal adenoma incidence and malignant progression
Min Deng, Siqin Lei, Dongdong Huang, Hui Wang, Shuli Xia, Enping Xu, Yihua Wu, Honghe Zhang
Pathology - Research and Practice.2020; 216(2): 152775. CrossRef
Use of metformin and risk of breast and colorectal cancer
Gad Rennert, Hedy S. Rennert, Naomi Gronich, Mila Pinchev, Stephen B. Gruber
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2020; 165: 108232. CrossRef
Diabetes Mellitus: a Clinical Condition Associated with Metabolic Syndrome and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Vesna Brzacki, Aleksandar Nagorni, Manolis Kallistratos, Athanasios Manolis, Dragan Lovic
Current Pharmacology Reports.2019; 5(4): 205. CrossRef
Diabetes Mellitus and Colon Carcinogenesis: Expectation for Inhibition of Colon Carcinogenesis by Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs
Junichi Kato, Yohei Shirakami, Masahito Shimizu
Gastrointestinal Disorders.2019; 1(2): 273. CrossRef
Metformin in colorectal cancer: molecular mechanism, preclinical and clinical aspects
Muhamad Noor Alfarizal Kamarudin, Md. Moklesur Rahman Sarker, Jin-Rong Zhou, Ishwar Parhar
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a lower incidence of colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer
Hee Seung Lee, Sung Bae Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo Jung Park, Sung Pil Hong, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Tae Il Kim
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(3): 688. CrossRef
Parameters of Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Affect the Occurrence of Colorectal Adenomas Detected by Surveillance Colonoscopies
Nam Hee Kim, Jung Yul Suh, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
Yonsei Medical Journal.2017; 58(2): 347. CrossRef
Diabetes-induced mechanophysiological changes in the small intestine and colon
Mirabella Zhao, Donghua Liao, Jingbo Zhao
World Journal of Diabetes.2017; 8(6): 249. CrossRef
Metformin use and the risk of colorectal adenoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Yoon Suk Jung, Chan Hyuk Park, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Dong Soo Han
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(5): 957. CrossRef
Energy sensing pathways: Bridging type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer?
Juhong Yang, Reiko Nishihara, Xuehong Zhang, Shuji Ogino, Zhi Rong Qian
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications.2017; 31(7): 1228. CrossRef
Metformin therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis
Yi-Chao Hou, Qiang Hu, Jiao Huang, Jing-Yuan Fang, Hua Xiong
Oncotarget.2017; 8(5): 8843. CrossRef
Metformin therapy and risk of colorectal adenomas and colorectal cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Feifei Liu, Lijing Yan, Zhan Wang, Yuanan Lu, Yuanyuan Chu, Xiangyu Li, Yisi Liu, Dongsheng Rui, Shaofa Nie, Hao Xiang
Oncotarget.2017; 8(9): 16017. CrossRef
Therapeutic strategies against cancer stem cells in human colorectal cancer (Review)
Magdalena Szaryńska, Agata Olejniczak, Jarosław Kobiela, Piotr Spychalski, Zbigniew Kmieć
Oncology Letters.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Potential Benefit of Metformin as Treatment for Colon Cancer: the Evidence so Far
Azza Ali Abdelsatir, Nazik Elmalaika Husain, Abdallah Tarig Hassan, Wadie M Elmadhoun, Ahmed O Almobarak, Mohamed H Ahmed
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2016; 16(18): 8053. CrossRef
Weight Change and Obesity Are Associated with a Risk of Adenoma Recurrence
Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2016; 61(9): 2694. CrossRef
Associations between amount of smoking and alcohol intake and risk of colorectal neoplasm
Yoon Suk Jung, Hwanseok Jung, Kyung Eun Yun, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Dong Il Park, Kyuyong Choi
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(4): 788. CrossRef
Metformin, Diabetes, and Survival among U.S. Veterans with Colorectal Cancer
Jessica K. Paulus, Christina D. Williams, Furha I. Cossor, Michael J. Kelley, Robert E. Martell
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2016; 25(10): 1418. CrossRef
Inhibitory Effect of Metformin Therapy on the Incidence of Colorectal Advanced Adenomas in Patients With Diabetes
Yo Han Kim, Ran Noh, Sun Young Cho, Seong Jun Park, Soung Min Jeon, Hyun Deok Shin, Suk Bae Kim, Jeong Eun Shin
Intestinal Research.2015; 13(2): 145. CrossRef

6,439 View
59 Download
29 Web of Science
25 Crossref

The Effect of Indigocarmine on Improvement of the Polyp Detection Rate during Colonoscopic Examination with Hood Cap: Sang Chang Kwon, Sung Won Choi, Seong Ho Choi, Hee Seung Park, Seung Heon Lee, Bong Gun Kim, Eun Hee Seo, Mun Jang, Seung Min Ryu, Dong Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Kim, Jun Ouk Ha, Jae Seung Lee; Intest Res 2014;12(1):60-65. Published online January 28, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2014.12.1.60

Abstract PDF PubReader

Background/Aims

Hood cap-assisted chromocolonoscopy using indigocarmine is expected to improve the detection rate of colorectal polyps, especially adenomatous polyps. Therefore, aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of hood cap-assisted chromocolonoscopy in routine colonoscopic examinations.

Methods

From January, 2013 through March, 2013, a total of 86 patients were enrolled (M:F=33:53, mean age=60 years). For each patient, hood cap-assisted colonoscopic examination was performed, followed by hood cap-assisted chromocolonoscopy using 0.2% indigocarmine from the cecum to the hepatic flexure. Total numbers and characteristics of polyps were compared before and after indigo carmine dye spraying.

Results

Prior to dye spraying, 48 polyps were found in 37 patients, and after dye spraying, 53 additional polyps were found in 34 patients. Of these undetected polyps, 45 (85%) were small sized polyps (≤0.5 cm). Histologically, 19 (36%) were adenomatous polyps, and of these, 15 (28%) were tubular adenomas and 4 (8%) were serrated adenomas. As for the polyp detection rate, there was no difference between the expert and the non-expert groups.

Conclusion

Hood cap-assisted chromocolonoscopic examination using indigocarmine was helpful in detecting cecum and ascending colon polyps, especially small sized polyps (<0.5 cm) and neoplastic polyps.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Risk factors for peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who undergo colonoscopy: a retrospective multicentre study
Tae-Geun Gweon, Sung Hoon Jung, Sang Woo Kim, Kang-Moon Lee, Dae Young Cheung, Bo-In Lee, Hwang Choi
BMC Gastroenterology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps
Soo-kyung Park, Bong Min Ko, Jae Pil Han, Su Jin Hong, Moon Sung Lee
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 83(3): 527. CrossRef
Is Retroflexion Helpful in Detecting Adenomas in the Right Colon?: A Single Center Interim Analysis
Hyun Seok Lee, Seong Woo Jeon
Intestinal Research.2015; 13(4): 326. CrossRef
Detection of Polyps Including Adenomas in the Ascending Colon by Cap-assisted Chromocolonoscopy with Indigo Carmine
Hyun Seok Lee
Intestinal Research.2014; 12(1): 3. CrossRef

12,225 View
44 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search