Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Sin-Ho Jung"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Endoscopy
Three-year colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy in Korea: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter prospective study
Won Seok Choi, Dong Soo Han, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Dong-Hoon Yang, Sung-Ae Jung, Sang Kil Lee, Sung Pil Hong, Cheol Hee Park, Suck-Ho Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Sung Jae Shin, Bora Keum, Hyun Soo Kim, Jung Hye Choi, Sin-Ho Jung
Intest Res 2018;16(1):126-133.   Published online January 18, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.126
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colonoscopic surveillance is currently recommended after polypectomy owing to the risk of newly developed colonic neoplasia. However, few studies have investigated colonoscopy surveillance in Asia. This multicenter and prospective study was undertaken to assess the incidence of advanced adenoma based on baseline adenoma findings at 3 years after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Methods

A total of 1,323 patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively assigned to 3-year colonoscopy surveillance at 11 tertiary endoscopic centers. Relative risks for advanced adenoma after 3 years were calculated according to baseline adenoma characteristics.

Results

Among 1,323 patients enrolled, 387 patients (29.3%) were followed up, and the mean follow-up interval was 31.0±9.8 months. The percentage of patients with advanced adenoma on baseline colonoscopy was higher in the surveillance group compared to the non-surveillance group (34.4% vs. 25.7%). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed in 17 patients (4.4%) at follow-up. The risk of advanced adenoma recurrence was 2 times greater in patients with baseline advanced adenoma than in those with baseline non-advanced adenoma, though the difference was not statistically significant (6.8% [9/133] vs. 3.1% [8/254], P=0.09). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed only in males and in subjects aged ≥50 years. In contrast, adenoma recurrence was observed in 187 patients (48.3%) at follow-up. Male sex, older age (≥50 years), and multiple adenomas (≥3) at baseline were independent risk factors for adenoma recurrence.

Conclusions

A colonoscopy surveillance interval of 3 years in patients with baseline advanced adenoma can be considered appropriate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • When should patients take simethicone orally before colonoscopy for avoiding bubbles: A single-blind, randomized controlled study
    Woohyuk Jung, Gyu Man Oh, Jae Hyun Kim, Youn Jung Choi, Min Young Son, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
    Medicine.2023; 102(19): e33728.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
    Jae Hyun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Tae Oh Kim, Jongha Park, Gyu Man Oh, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
    Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29884.     CrossRef
  • Optimization of the surveillance strategy in patients with colorectal adenomas: A combination of clinical parameters and index colonoscopy findings
    Chan Hyuk Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(4): 974.     CrossRef
  • Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(2): 239.     CrossRef
  • Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after resection of low-risk diminutive versus small adenomas
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(3): 622.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Colonoscopic Surveillance Interval After Normal Baseline Screening Colonoscopy
    Jian Dong, Minman Wu, Jiarong Miao, Rana Sami Ullah Khan, Tao Zhi, Tianmei Zhang, Xue Li, Yashi Peng, Gang Yang, Qiong Nan
    Gastroenterology Nursing.2020; 43(3): 225.     CrossRef
  • Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of 1- to 5-mm versus 6- to 9-mm adenomas on the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia
    Yoon Suk Jung, Tae Jun Kim, Eunwoo Nam, Chan Hyuk Park
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(3): 692.     CrossRef
  • Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
    Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of obesity and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in men
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(9): 1504.     CrossRef
  • What Is Appropriate Upper Endoscopic Interval Among Dyspeptic Patients With Previously Normal Endoscopy? A Multicenter Study With Bayesian Change Point Analysis
    Jong Wook Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Joong Goo Kwon, Jung Bok Lee, Jong Kyu Park, Ki Bae Bang, Chung Hyun Tae, Jung Hwan Oh
    Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2019; 25(4): 544.     CrossRef
  • Risk of Developing Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia After Polypectomy in Patients With Multiple Diminutive or Small Adenomas
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(10): 1657.     CrossRef
  • 8,937 View
  • 79 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP