Intestinal Research

Original Articles

Thirty-day mortality after percutaneous gastrostomy by endoscopic versus radiologic placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Joo Hyun Lim, Seung Ho Choi, Changhyun Lee, Ji Yeon Seo, Hae Yeon Kang, Jong In Yang, Su Jin Chung, Joo Sung Kim; Intest Res 2016;14(4):333-342. Published online October 17, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.4.333

Background/Aims

A percutaneous gastrostomy can be placed either endoscopically (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, PEG) or radiologically (radiologically-inserted gastrostomy, RIG). However, there is no consistent evidence of the safety and efficacy of PEG compared to RIG. Recently, 30-day mortality has become considered as the most important surrogate index for evaluating the safety and efficacy of percutaneous gastrostomy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the 30-day mortality rates between PEG and RIG.

Methods

Major electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane library) were queried for comparative studies on the two insertion techniques of gastrostomy among adults with swallowing disturbance. The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality rate after gastrostomy insertion. Forest and funnel plots were generated for outcomes using STATA version 14.0.

Results

Fifteen studies (n=2,183) met the inclusion criteria. PEG was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality after tube placement compared with RIG (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38–0.94; P=0.026). The pooled prevalence of 30-day mortality of PEG was 5.5% (95% CI, 4.0%–6.9%) and that of RIG was 10.5% (95% CI, 6.8%–14.3%). No publication bias was noted.

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis demonstrated that PEG is associated with a lower probability of 30-day mortality compared to RIG, suggesting that PEG should be considered as the first choice for long-term enteral tube feeding. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate and compare the safety of these two different methods of gastrostomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Factors Predicting Major Complications and Mortality in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: 8 Years of Experience of a Tertiary Surgery Center
Murat Yildirim, Asim Kocabay, Bulent Koca, Ali Ihsan Saglam, Namik Ozkan
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Improving 30-day mortality after radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube from 2007 to 2019: A population-based study of 15,605 patients
Syed Shezal Hussain, Nosheen Umar, Umair Kamran, Benjamin Coupland, Fumi Varyani, Nigel Trudgill
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.2025; 66: 381. CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie Heimenterale und heimparenterale Ernährung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Ernährungsmedizin (DGEM)
Stephan C. Bischoff, Jann Arends, Christiane Decker-Baumann, Elisabeth Hütterer, Sebastian Koch, Stefan Mühlebach, Ingeborg Roetzer, Andrea Schneider, Claudia Seipt, Ralph Simanek, Zeno Stanga
Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin.2024; 49(02): 73. CrossRef
Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Matheus Coelho Meine, Isabela Ho Tusato, Nathalia Hoffmeister, Gilmara Coelho Meine
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.2024; 48(6): 667. CrossRef
Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Versus Radiological Gastrostomy in Patients Unable to Undergo Transoral Endoscopic Pull Gastrostomy
Divyanshoo R. Kohli, Craig Smith, Omer Chaudhry, Madhav Desai, Dion DePaolis, Prateek Sharma
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(3): 852. CrossRef
Complications of Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy Among Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Najla Alrasheed, Haneen S Khair, Renad M Aljohani, Noof M Alharbi, Nahlah N Alotaibi, Shahad F AlEdrees, Aamir Omair
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A retrospective study of outcomes and the validation of the Sheffield Gastrostomy Score in PEGs, RIGs and PIGs
Heather Parr, Lloyd Thomas, Prabhsimran Singh, Salma Mohammed, Khin Nu, John S. Kane, Fred Lee, Thomas Welbank, Andrew D. Hopper, Mark E. McAlindon, Elizabeth A. Williams, David S. Sanders
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(12): 1542. CrossRef
Endoscopic vs radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Evellin Souza Valentim dos Santos, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Bruno Salomão Hirsch, Roberto Paolo Trasolini, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
World Journal of Meta-Analysis.2023; 11(6): 277. CrossRef
Outcomes of push and pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placements in 854 patients: A single‐center study
Hicham Bouchiba, Maarten A J M Jacobs, Gerd Bouma, Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
JGH Open.2022; 6(1): 57. CrossRef
Factors affecting late complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement
Kasenee Tiankanon, Satimai Aniwan, Julalak Karuehardsuwan, Sumitra Wiangngoen, Rungsun Rerknimitr
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.2022; 49: 378. CrossRef
The Outcomes of Nutritional Support Techniques in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers
Vlad-Alexandru Ionescu, Gina Gheorghe, Ruxandra Oprita, Madalina Stan-Ilie, Raluca-Ioana Dascalu, Ondin Zaharia, Viorel Jinga, Camelia Cristina Diaconu, Gabriel Constantinescu
Gastroenterology Insights.2022; 13(3): 245. CrossRef
Improving 30-day mortality after PEG tube placement in England from 2007 to 2019: a retrospective national cohort analysis of 87,862 patients
Umair Kamran, Pui Chi Lee, Ben Coupland, Abdullah Abbasi, Helen Steed, Sissi Ispoglou, Fumi Varyani, Nigel Trudgill
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 96(6): 943. CrossRef
Outcomes following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus fluoroscopic procedures in the Medicare population
Samantha Maasarani, Syed I. Khalid, Chantal Creighton, Athena J. Manatis-Lornell, Aaron L. Wiegmann, Samantha L. Terranella, Nicholas J. Skertich, Laura DeCesare, Edie Y. Chan
Surgery Open Science.2021; 3: 2. CrossRef
Safety of endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement compared with radiologic or surgical gastrostomy: nationwide inpatient assessment
Divyanshoo R. Kohli, Kevin F. Kennedy, Madhav Desai, Prateek Sharma
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 93(5): 1077. CrossRef
Laparoscopic vs open insertion of feeding gastrostomy tube in adults with head and neck cancers: A case‐matched comparative study
Balqees Omari, Huthaifa Asmer, Hani Al‐Najjar, Issa Mohamad, Omar Al‐Saraireh, Basil J. Ammori
International Journal of Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Xudong Liu, Zhengqiang Yang, Shun He, Guiqi Wang
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2021; 10(2): 42. CrossRef
Scheduled percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement did not reduce PEG-related complications
Wisam Sbeit, Anas Kadah, Amir Shahin, Samer Shbat, Moeen Sbeit, Tawfik Khoury
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(11): 1386. CrossRef
Comparative Safety of Endoscopic vs Radiological Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Outcomes From a Large, Nationwide Veterans Affairs Database
Divyanshoo R. Kohli, Kevin F. Kennedy, Madhav Desai, Prateek Sharma
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 116(12): 2367. CrossRef
ESPEN guideline on home enteral nutrition
Stephan C. Bischoff, Peter Austin, Kurt Boeykens, Michael Chourdakis, Cristina Cuerda, Cora Jonkers-Schuitema, Marek Lichota, Ibolya Nyulasi, Stéphane M. Schneider, Zeno Stanga, Loris Pironi
Clinical Nutrition.2020; 39(1): 5. CrossRef
Technical success rate and safety of radiologically inserted gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in motor neuron disease patients undergoing: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Tian-wen Yuan, Yang He, Sai-bo Wang, Peng Kong, Jun Cao
Journal of the Neurological Sciences.2020; 410: 116622. CrossRef
Predictors for 30-day mortality and complications following radiologically inserted gastrostomies: a single centre, large cohort review
J. Delf, S. Jepson, S. Ramachandran, M. Elabassy, B. Morgan, R. Kenningham, J.H. Mullineux, J.A. Stephenson
Clinical Radiology.2020; 75(5): 375. CrossRef
Gastropexy can be as safe as conventional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and biomarkers do not predict short-term or long-term outcomes: a 7-year follow-up audit
Ross J Porter, Alastair W McKinlay, Emma L Metcalfe
Frontline Gastroenterology.2020; 11(5): 364. CrossRef
Early versus Delayed Feeding after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Children: A Meta-Analysis
Jun Watanabe, Kazuhiko Kotani
Children.2020; 7(9): 124. CrossRef
Reducing 30-day post gastrostomy insertion mortality with a feeding issues multidisciplinary team meeting
A. Bond, T. Conley, J. Fiske, V. Raymond, A. Young, P. Collins, M. Dibb, P.J. Smith
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.2020; 40: 282. CrossRef
Nutritional Support of Cancer Patients without Oral Feeding: How to Select the Most Effective Technique?
Gonçalo Nunes, Jorge Fonseca, Ana Teresa Barata, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 27(3): 172. CrossRef
Retrospective comparison of outcomes and associated complications between large bore radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube types
David J. Tischfield, Gregory J. Nadolski, Stephen J. Hunt, Maxim Itkin, Richard D. Shlansky-Goldberg, Terence P. Gade
Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(1): 318. CrossRef
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for enteral nutrition: a 5-year clinical experience with 324 patients
Ezekiel W. Toh Yoon, Kaori Yoneda, Kazuki Nishihara
Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Simple Bedside Predictors of Survival after Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Insertion
Wisam Sbeit, Anas Kadah, Amir Mari, Mahmud Mahamid, Tawfik Khoury
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Risk factors for complications and mortality of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion
Gyu Young Pih, Hee Kyong Na, Ji Yong Ahn, Kee Wook Jung, Do Hoon Kim, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung
BMC Gastroenterology.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Outcomes and Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Versus Radiologic Gastrostomy for Enteral Feeding
Denise Strijbos, Daniel Keszthelyi, Roel M.M. Bogie, Lennard P.L. Gilissen, Martin Lacko, Janneke G.J. Hoeijmakers, Christiaan van der Leij, Rogier de Ridder, Michiel W. de Haan, Ad A.M. Masclee
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2018; 52(9): 753. CrossRef
Percutaneous Endoscopic Transgastric Jejunostomy (PEG‐J) Tube Placement for Levodopa‐Carbidopa Intrajejunal Gel Therapy in the Interventional Radiology Suite: A Long‐term Follow‐up
Maria Valeria Saddi, Marianna Sarchioto, Giulia Serra, Daniela Murgia, Valeria Ricchi, Marta Melis, Roberta Arca, Pierpaolo Carreras, Loredana Sitzia, Sandro Zedda, Giovanni Dui, Rosario Rossi, Anna Ticca, Maurizio Melis, Giovanni Cossu
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice.2018; 5(2): 191. CrossRef
Percutaneous Radiologically-Guided Gastrostomy (PRG): Safety, Efficacy and Trends in a Single Institution
Gerard ZX Low, Chow Wei Too, Yen Yeong Poh, Richard HG Lo, Bien Soo Tan, Apoorva Gogna, Farah Gillan Irani, Kiang Hiong Tay
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.2018; 47(11): 494. CrossRef

7,317 View
82 Download
37 Web of Science
32 Crossref

Characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected colorectal cancers that arose from sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas: Ji Yeon Seo, Seung Ho Choi, Jaeyoung Chun, Changhyun Lee, Ji Min Choi, Eun Hyo Jin, Sung Wook Hwang, Jong Pil Im, Sang Gyun Kim, Joo Sung Kim; Intest Res 2016;14(3):270-279. Published online June 27, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.3.270

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of colorectal cancer derived from sessile serrated adenomas or traditional serrated adenomas are still unknown. The aims of this study were to verify the characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected early colorectal cancers developed from serrated polyps.

Methods

Among patients who received endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancers from 2008 to 2011, cancers with documented pre-existing lesions were included. They were classified as adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma, or traditional serrated adenoma according to the baseline lesions. Clinical characteristics, pathologic diagnosis, and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

Overall, 208 colorectal cancers detected from 198 patients were included: 198 with adenoma, five with sessile serrated adenoma, and five with traditional serrated adenoma. The sessile serrated adenoma group had a higher prevalence of high-grade dysplasia (40.0% vs. 25.8%, P<0.001) than the adenoma group. During follow-up, local recurrence did not occur after endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancers developed from serrated polyps. In contrast, two cases of metachronous recurrence were detected within a short follow-up period.

Conclusions

Cautious observation and early endoscopic resection are recommended when colorectal cancer from serrated polyp is suspected. Colorectal cancers from serrated polyp can be treated successfully with endoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Small sessile serrated polyps might not be at a higher risk for future advanced neoplasia than low-risk adenomas or polyp-free groups
Eun Hyo Jin, Ji Yeon Seo, Jung Ho Bae, Jooyoung Lee, Ji Min Choi, Yoo Min Han, Joo Hyun Lim
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(1): 99. CrossRef
The incidence and risk factors of sessile serrated adenomas in left side colon cancer patients after curative surgery
Myung Hee Kim, Hee Seok Moon, In Sun Kwon, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Jae Kyu Sung, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
Medicine.2020; 99(29): e20799. CrossRef
Improved Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Following a Comprehensive Training Program
Jung Ho Bae, Changhyun Lee, Hae Yeon Kang, Min-Sun Kwak, Eun Young Doo, Ji Yeon Seo, Ji Hyun Song, Sun Young Yang, Jong In Yang, Seon Hee Lim, Jeong Yoon Yim, Joo Hyun Lim, Goh Eun Chung, Su Jin Chung, Eun Hyo Jin, Boram Park, Joo Sung Kim
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 17(12): 2479. CrossRef
Clinical outcomes of surveillance colonoscopy for patients with sessile serrated adenoma
Sung Jae Park, Hyuk Yoon, In Sub Jung, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Na Young Kim, Dong Ho Lee
Intestinal Research.2018; 16(1): 134. CrossRef
Surveillance colonoscopy in patients with sessile serrated adenoma
Ji Hyung Nam, Hyoun Woo Kang
Intestinal Research.2018; 16(3): 502. CrossRef
Identification of risk factors for sessile and traditional serrated adenomas of the colon by using big data analysis
Jeung Hui Pyo, Sang Yun Ha, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Hee Jung Son, Kyoung‐Mee Kim, Hyeseung Kim, Kyunga Kim, Jee Eun Kim, Yoon‐Ho Choi, Young‐Ho Kim
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2018; 33(5): 1039. CrossRef
Endoscopic Resection of Cecal Polyps Involving the Appendiceal Orifice: A KASID Multicenter Study
Eun Mi Song, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Jung Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun Gun Kim, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon, Byung Chang Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2017; 62(11): 3138. CrossRef
Is colorectal cancer screening necessary before 50 years of age?
Yoon Suk Jung
Intestinal Research.2017; 15(4): 550. CrossRef
Derivation and validation of a risk scoring model to predict advanced colorectal neoplasm in adults of all ages
Hyo‐Joon Yang, Sungkyoung Choi, Soo‐Kyung Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Kyu Yong Choi, Taesung Park, Ji Yeon Kim, Dong Il Park
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(7): 1328. CrossRef
Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy
Jeonghun Lee, Sung Won Park, You Sun Kim, Kyung Jin Lee, Hyun Sung, Pil Hun Song, Won Jae Yoon, Jeong Seop Moon
Medicine.2017; 96(27): e7468. CrossRef

6,638 View
57 Download
11 Web of Science
10 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search